12.04.2015 Views

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

3720 - Board of Claims

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For the Extended Field Conditions, Intercounty has established that it incurred additional<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> $4,000 for lot rental; $1,677.40 for trailer rental; $127.79 for inspector’s <strong>of</strong>fice supplies;<br />

$1,923.76 for telephones; $1,690.27 for electricity; $466.40 for job container rental; $1,004.65<br />

for dumpsters and $640.00 for sanitary facilities. Intercounty is entitled to recover these<br />

expenses incurred during the extended period, totaling $11,530.27, from PennDOT. With<br />

markups pursuant to Sections 110.03(d)(4) and (7) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications, which we find<br />

appropriate in this case, we hold that Intercounty sustained damages for Extended Field<br />

Conditions in the total amount <strong>of</strong> $12,470.02.<br />

For the Extended Maintenance and Protection <strong>of</strong> Traffic (“MPT”), the <strong>Board</strong> finds that<br />

for the delay period from November 6, 2002 to completion <strong>of</strong> the Project, Intercounty incurred<br />

additional labor and equipment costs for the maintenance and protection <strong>of</strong> traffic comprised <strong>of</strong><br />

flaggers and accompanying rack truck while work was being performed on the roadway. The<br />

evidence establishes that Intercounty is due $10,578.16 in additional MPT costs for this period.<br />

With appropriate markup, pursuant to Sections 110.03(d)(4) and (7) <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications,<br />

this results in $14,225.79 in total MPT damages for the extended period.<br />

Intercounty also claims it has incurred an additional $115,956 in material cost escalation<br />

for asphalt used on the Project due to the delay. In addition to denying liability, PennDOT also<br />

objects to paying for this claim because it contends this additional amount is not supported by the<br />

evidence.<br />

Under Section 110.04 <strong>of</strong> the 408 Specifications, the contractor may recover for material<br />

cost increases for bituminous materials. At the hearing, Mr. Lizza testified that on June 15,<br />

2002, Tilcon New York, Inc. (“Tilcon”), Intercounty’s asphalt supplier, sent Intercounty a letter,<br />

notifying it that because the Project was extending past its original August 2002 completion date<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!