11.07.2015 Views

ClimateChange Assessment Guide.pdf - University of Waterloo

ClimateChange Assessment Guide.pdf - University of Waterloo

ClimateChange Assessment Guide.pdf - University of Waterloo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C-2<strong>Guide</strong> for <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>of</strong> Hydrological Effects <strong>of</strong> Climate Change in OntarioID IPCC <strong>Assessment</strong> Model GHG Emission Scenario Longitude Latitude47 AR4 GFDLCM2.1 SR-A1B -81.25 43.4848 AR4 GFDLCM2.1 SR-B1 -81.25 43.4820 AR4 GISSAOM SR-A1B -82.00 43.5021 AR4 GISSAOM SR-B1 -82.00 43.5022 AR4 GISSE-H SR-A1B -82.50 42.0023 AR4 GISSE-R SR-A2 -82.50 42.0024 AR4 GISSE-R SR-B1 -82.50 42.0049 AR4 HADCM3 SR-A2 -78.75 45.0050 AR4 HADCM3 SR-A1B -78.75 45.0051 AR4 HADCM3 SR-B1 -78.75 45.0025 AR4 HadGEM1 SR-A2 -79.69 44.3826 AR4 HadGEM1 SR-A1B -79.69 44.3827 AR4 INMCM3.0 SR-A2 -80.00 44.0028 AR4 INMCM3.0 SR-A1B -80.00 44.0029 AR4 INMCM3.0 SR-B1 -80.00 44.0030 AR4 IPSLCM4 SR-A2 -78.75 44.3731 AR4 IPSLCM4 SR-A1B -78.75 44.3732 AR4 IPSLCM4 SR-B1 -78.75 44.3733 AR4 MIROC3.2 hires SR-A1B -79.88 44.3034 AR4 MIROC3.2 hires SR-B1 -79.88 44.3035 AR4 MIROC3.2 medres SR-A2 -78.75 43.2536 AR4 MIROC3.2 medres SR-B1 -78.75 43.2552 AR4 MIROC3.2 medres SR-A1B -78.75 43.2537 AR4 MRI CGCM2.3.2a SR-A2 -78.75 43.2538 AR4 MRI CGCM2.3.2a SR-A1B -78.75 43.2539 AR4 MRI CGCM2.3.2a SR-B1 -78.75 43.2553 AR4 NCARCCSM3 SR-A2 -80.16 44.1254 AR4 NCARCCSM3 SR-A1B -80.16 44.1255 AR4 NCARCCSM3 SR-B1 -80.16 44.1256 AR4 NCARPCM SR-A2 -78.75 43.2557 AR4 NCARPCM SR-A1B -78.75 43.25Scenarios selected for Scatter Plot MethodScenarios selected for Percentile MethodThe output from HSP-F for the future climates selected using the Scatter Plot Method, Percentile Method and AllFuture Climates is organized into a series <strong>of</strong> figures for comparison purposes:• Figures C.1 to C.6 illustrate the mean monthly recharge and monthly recharge statistics for sandy soils,silty soils and clayey soils for each scenario-generating method.• Figures C.7 to C.12 illustrate the mean monthly run<strong>of</strong>f and monthly run<strong>of</strong>f statistics for sandy soils, siltysoils and clayey soils for each scenario-generating method.• Figures C.13 to C.18 illustrate the mean monthly evapotranspiration and monthly evapotranspirationstatistics for sandy soils, silty soils and clayey soils for each scenario-generating method.By comparing the output obtained using each method, it is possible to understand the impact that the number <strong>of</strong>scenarios has on the range in output. Evidently, using all 57 scenarios provides the largest range in output; however

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!