11.07.2015 Views

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

150equipped with the coordinates (x, u, ν, χ), <strong>de</strong>fined by the Cartesian equations(7.28) u j = Ω j (x, ν, χ), j = 1, . . .,m.Let us <strong>de</strong>note this submanifold by M . We stress that in general such a submanifoldcannot coinci<strong>de</strong> with the complexification of a generic submanifoldof C m+n , for instance because K may be equal to R or, if K = C,because the integer p is not necessarily equal to n. Also, even if K = C andn = p, the mapping Ω does not satisfy a functional equation like (7.28). Infact, it may be easily established that the submanifold of solutions of a completelyintegrable system of partial differential equations like (E ) coinci<strong>de</strong>swith the complexification of a generic submanifold if and only if K = C,p = n and the mapping Ω satisfies a functional equation like (7.28).Let now M be a submanifold of K n+2n+p of the form (7.28), but notnecessarily constructed as the submanifold of solutions of a system (E ). Weshall always assume that Ω j (0, ν, χ) ≡ ν j . We say that M is solvable withrespect to the parameters if there exist multiindices β(1), . . ., β(p) ∈ N nwith |β(q)| ≥ 1 for q = 1, . . .,p and integers j(1), . . ., j(p) with 1 ≤j(q) ≤ m for q = 1, . . ., p such that the local K-analytic mapping(7.28) (K m+p ∋ (ν, χ) ↦−→ (Ω j (0, ν, χ) 1≤j≤m , ( Ω j(q),x β(q)(0, ν, χ) ) )∈ K m+p1≤q≤pis of rank equal to m+p at (ζ, χ) = (0, 0) (notice that since Ω j (0, ν, χ) ≡ ν j ,then the m first components of the mapping (7.28) are already of rank m).We remark that the submanifold of solutions of a system (E ) is automaticallysolvable with respect to the variab<strong>les</strong>, the multiindices β(q) and theintegers j(q) being the same as in the arguments of the right hand si<strong>de</strong> termsF j α in (E ).2.5. Dual system of <strong>de</strong>fining equations. Since Ω j (0, ν, χ) ≡ ν j , we maysolve the equations (7.28) with respect to ν by means of the analytic implicitfunction theorem, getting an equivalent system of equations for M :(7.28) ν j = Ω ∗ j(χ, x, u), j = 1, . . ., m.We call this the dual system of <strong>de</strong>fining equations for M . By construction,we have the functional equation(7.28) u ≡ Ω(x, Ω ∗ (χ, x, u), χ),implying the i<strong>de</strong>ntity Ω ∗ j (0, x, u) ≡ uj . We say that M is solvable withrespect to the variab<strong>les</strong> if there exist multiindices δ(1), . . ., δ(n) ∈ N p with|δ(l)| ≥ 1 for l = 1, . . .,n and integers j(1), . . ., j(n) with 1 ≤ j(l) ≤ m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!