11.07.2015 Views

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Re<strong>de</strong>veloping the <strong>de</strong>terminant, the vanishing of the coefficients of x 1 x 1 , ofx 1 a 1 , of a 1 a 1 yields the system⎧0 ≡ Λ ⎪⎨1,1 Λ 2,0x 2 a− 2 Λ 2,02 aΛ 1,12 x, 2(8.126) 0 ≡ Λ 1,1 Λ 1,1x⎪⎩2 a− Λ 1,12 aΛ 1,12 x− 4 Λ 2,02 aΛ 0,22 x, 20 ≡ Λ 1,1 Λ 0,2x 2 a− 2 Λ 0,22 xΛ 1,12 a. 2Since Λ 1,1 (0) = 2 ≠ 0, we may divi<strong>de</strong> by Λ 1,1 , obtaining a PDE system withthe three functions Λ 2,0x 2 a, Λ 1,12 x 2 a, Λ 0,22 x 2 ain the left hand si<strong>de</strong>. We observe that2the normalizations of Lemma 8.55 entail(8.127)Λ 2,0 = a 2 +O(x 2 a 2 ), Λ 1,1 = 2+O(x 2 a 2 ), Λ 0,2 = x 2 +O(x 2 a 2 ).By cross differentiations in the mentioned PDE system, it follows that all theTaylor coefficients of Λ 2,0 , Λ 1,1 , Λ 0,2 are uniquely <strong>de</strong>termined. As alreadydiscovered in [GM2003b], the unique solution(8.128) Λ 2,0 a 22x 2=1 − x 2 a 2, Λ1,1 =1 − x 2 a 2, Λ0,2 =1 − x 2 a 2,guarantees, when the remain<strong>de</strong>r O 3 (x 1 , a 1 ) vanishes, that the <strong>de</strong>terminant(8.45) in<strong>de</strong>ed vanishes i<strong>de</strong>ntically.Conversely, suppose that dim SYM(E 5 ) = 10 is maximal.With ε ≠ 0 small, replacing (x 1 , x 2 , y, a 1 , a 2 , b) by(εx 1 , x 2 , ε 2 y, εa 1 , a 2 , εεb) in (8.122) and dividing by εε, the remain<strong>de</strong>rterms become small:(8.129) y = b + 2 x1 a 1 + x 1 x 1 a 2 + a 1 a 1 x 21 − x 2 a 2 + O(ε).Then all the remain<strong>de</strong>rs in the equations ∆ E5 of the skeleton are O(ε). Weget ten generators similar to (8.120), plus an O(ε) perturbation. Thanks tothe rigidity of so(5, C), Theorem 5.15 provi<strong>de</strong>s a change of generators, closeto the 10×10 i<strong>de</strong>ntity matrix, leading to the same structure constants as thoseof the ten vector fields (8.120). As in the end of the proof of Theorem 5.13,we may then straighten some relevant vector fields (exercise) and finallycheck that their tangency to the skeleton implies that it is the mo<strong>de</strong>l one.Theorem 8.117 is proved.Corollary 8.130. Let M ⊂ C 3 be a connected real analytic hyper<strong>sur</strong>facewhose Levi form has uniform rank 1 that is 2-non<strong>de</strong>generate at every point.Then(8.131) dimhol(M) 10,and the bound is attained if and only if M is locally, in a neighborhood ofZariski-generic points, biholomorphic to the mo<strong>de</strong>l M 0 .289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!