11.07.2015 Views

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222has nonvanishing (n+1) ×(n+1) Jacobian <strong>de</strong>terminant at (z, w) = (0, 0).It follows then that this Jacobian <strong>de</strong>terminant, not restricted to the origin:(7.28) ∆ = ∆ ( z, z, w ) Θ z1 · · · Θ zn Θ w:=Θ z1 z 1· · · Θ z1 z nΘ z1 w·· · · · ·· ··∣ Θ znz 1· · · Θ znz nΘ znw∣does not vanish in some small neighborhood of the origin in C n × C n × C.Levi non<strong>de</strong>generacy at the central point, i.e. ∆ ≠ 0 locally, will be assumedthroughout the present paper.Associated system of partial differential equations. At least since thepublication in 1888 by <strong>Lie</strong> and Engel in Leipzig of the Theorie <strong>de</strong>r Transformationsguppen,it is known in a very general context — see Chapter 10of [8] and also [23, Ha1937, Ch1975, Fa1980, 19, 1, 21] — that, to thewhole family of Segre varieties:S z,w := { (z, w) ∈ C n × C: w = Θ ( z, z, w )}parametrized by the n + 1 antiholomorphic variab<strong>les</strong> ( z 1 , . . ., z n , w ) , onemay canonically associate a completely integrable second-or<strong>de</strong>r system ofpartial differential equations whose general solution is precisely the functionΘ ( z, z, w ) . In<strong>de</strong>ed, consi<strong>de</strong>ring w as a function w = w(z) of (z 1 , . . .,z n )in the <strong>de</strong>fining equation of M, one differentiates it once with respect to eachvariable z 1 , . . .,z n so that one gets the n + 1 equations:w(z) = Θ ( z, z, w ) ,w z1 (z) = ∂Θ∂z 1(z, z, w), . . ...., wzn (z) = ∂Θ∂z n(z, z, w).Then by means of the implicit function theorem — which applies preciselythanks to the nonvanishing of ∆ —, one may clearly solve for the n + 1antiholomorphic “parameters” (z, w), and this procedure provi<strong>de</strong>s a representation:z 1 = ζ 1(z, w(z), wz (z) ) , . . ., z n = ζ n(z, w(z), wz (z) ) , w = ξ ( z, w(z), w z (z) )with certain n + 1 uniquely <strong>de</strong>fined local complex analytic functionsζ i (z, w, w z ) and ξ(z, w, w z ) of 2n + 1 complex variab<strong>les</strong>. Utilizing thesefunctions, one is then pushed to replace z and w in all possible second-or<strong>de</strong>r<strong>de</strong>rivative:( )w zk1 z k2(z) =∂2 Θ∂z k1 ∂z k2z, z, w( ((7.28) = ∂2 Θ∂z k1 ∂z k2z, ζ z, w(z), wz (z) ) , ξ ( z, w(z), w z (z) ))=: Φ k1 ,k 2(z, w(z), wz (z) ) (k 1 , k 2 =1··· n),

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!