11.07.2015 Views

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

360use the fact that every cubic polynomial equation of the form(1.13)0 ≡ A ++n∑k 1 =1n∑B k1 · y x k 1 +n∑n∑k 1 =1 k 2 =1 k 2 =1n∑n∑k 1 =1 k 2 =1C k1 ,k 2· y x k 1 y x k 2 +D k1 ,k 2 ,k 3· y x k 1 y x k 2 y x k 3is equivalent to the annihilation of the following symmetric sums of its coefficients:(1.14) ⎧0 = A,⎪⎨ 0 = B k1 ,0 = C k1 ,k 2+ C k2 ,k 1,⎪⎩0 = D k1 ,k 2 ,k 3+ D k3 ,k 1 ,k 2+ D k2 ,k 3 ,k 1+ D k2 ,k 1 ,k 3+ D k3 ,k 2 ,k 1+ D k1 ,k 3 ,k 2.for all k 1 , k 2 , k 3 = 1, . . .,n.In conclusion, the functions G j1 ,j 2, H k 1j 1 ,j 2, L k 1j 1and M k 1in the statementof Theorem 1.7 are far from being arbitrary: they satisfy the complicatedsystem of first or<strong>de</strong>r partial differential equations (I’), (II’), (III’) and (IV’)above.Our proof of Theorem 1.7 is similar to the one provi<strong>de</strong>d in [Me2004], inthe case of systems of second or<strong>de</strong>r ordinary differential equations, so thatmost steps of the proof will be summarized.In the end of this paper, we will <strong>de</strong>lineate a complicated system of secondor<strong>de</strong>r partial differential equations satisfied by G j1 ,j 2, H k 1j 1 ,j 2, L k 1j 1andM k 1which is the exact analog of the system <strong>de</strong>scribed in the abstract. Themain technical part of the proof of Theorem 1.7 will be to establish thatthis second or<strong>de</strong>r system is a consequence, by linear combinations and bydifferentiations, of the first or<strong>de</strong>r system (I’), (II’), (III’) and (IV’).Open question 1.15. Are Theorems 1.1 and 1.7 true un<strong>de</strong>r weaker smoothnessassumptions, namely with a C 2 or a W 1,∞locright-hand si<strong>de</strong> ?We refer to [Ma2003] for inspiration and appropriate tools.Open question 1.16. Deduce from Theorem 1.7 an explicit necessary andsufficient condition for the associated submanifold of solutions y = b +Π(x i , a k , b) to be locally equivalent to Y = B + X 1 A 1 + · · · + X n A n .As an application, this would characterize local sphericity of a Levi non<strong>de</strong>generatehyper<strong>sur</strong>face M ⊂ C n+1 with n 2.Generalizing the <strong>Lie</strong>-Tresse classification would be a great achievement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!