Travaux sur les symÃ©tries de Lie des Ã©quations aux ... - DMA - Ens

More documents

Recommendations

Info

268• r and s are unspecified functions, varying in the context, of (x, y 1 , y 2 )with s = O(x) + O(y 1 ) + O(y 2 ), but possibly r(0) ≠ 0;• R is a remainder function of all the variables (x, y 1 , y 2 , y 1 1) parametrizing∆ E4 .Letting L = X ∂ + Y 1 ∂ + Y 2 ∂ be a candidate infinitesimal Lie∂x ∂y 1 ∂y 2symmetry and applying L (2) = L + Y1 1 ∂ + Y 2 ∂y11 1 ∂ + Y 1 ∂y12 2 ∂ + Y 2 ∂y21 2 ∂∂y22to ∆ E4 , we obtain firstly, computing mod (y1) 1 5 :(8.7)0 ≡ −Y1 2 + [ X ]( y1(2 1 + gx) 1 + (y1) 1 2 gx 2 + (y1) 1 3 r + (y1) 1 4 r ) ++ [ Y 1]( y1 1 r + (y1) 1 2 r + (y1) 1 3 r + (y1) 1 4 r ) ++ [ Y 2]( y1 1 r + (y1) 1 2 r + (y1) 1 3 r + (y1) 1 4 r ) ++ Y1( 1 2x + g 1 + y1 1 (2 + 2g2 ) + (y1 1 )2 s + (y1 1 )3 s + (y1 1 )4 s ) ,and secondly, computing mod (y 1 1 )2 :(8.8) 0 ≡ −Y 1 2 + 2 y1 1 Y1 1 h.The third Lie equation involving Y2 2 will be superfluous. Specializing(4.6)(II) to m = 2, we get Y1 1 and Y1:2(8.9)Y1 1 = Y x 1 + [ Y 1y − X ] 1 x y11 + [ ]Y 1y y2 2 1 + [ − X y 1](y11 ) 2 + [ − X y 2]y11 y12Y1 2 = Y x 2 + [ ]Y 2y y1 1 1 + [ Y 2y − X x]y2 2 1 + [ − X y 1]y21 y1 1 + [ − X y 2](y21 ) 2 .and also Y2 1 and Y2 2 (in fact superfluous):(8.10)Y2 1 = Y xx 1 + [ 2 Y 1xy − X ] 1 xx y11 + [ ]2 Y 1xy y2 2 1 + [ Y 1y 1 y − 2 X ] 1 xy 1 (y11 ) 2 ++ [ 2 Y 1y 1 y − 2 X ] 2 xy 2 y11 y1 2 + [ ]Y 1y 2 y (y2 2 1 ) 2 + [ ]− X y 1 y 1 (y11 ) 3 ++ [ ]− 2 X y 1 y 2 (y11 ) 2 y1 2 + [ ]− X y 2 y 2 y11 (y1 2 )2 + [ Y 1y − 2 X x]y1 1 2 ++ [ ]Y 1y y2 2 2 + [ − 3 X y 1]y11 y2 1 + [ − X y 2]y11 y2 2 + [ − 2 X y 2]y21 y2 1 ,Y2 2 = Yxx 2 + [ ]2 Y 2xy y1 1 1 + [ 2 Y 2xy − X ] 2 xx y21 + [ ]Y 2y 1 y (y1 1 1 ) 2 ++ [ 2 Y 2y 1 y − 2 X ] 2 xy 1 y11 y1 2 + [ Y 2y 2 y − 2 X ] 2 xy 2 (y21 ) 2 + [ ]− X y 1 y 1 (y11 ) 2 y1+2+ [ ]− 2 X y 1 y 2 y11 (y1) 2 2 + [ ]− X y 2 y 2 (y21 ) 3 + [ ]Yy 2 y1 1 2 ++ [ Y 2y − 2 X x]y2 2 2 + [ − 2 X y 1]y11 y2 2 + [ − X y 1]y21 y2 1 + [ − 3 X y 2]y21 y2.2Inserting Y1 2 and Y1 1 in the first Lie equation (8.7) in which y2 1 is replaced bythe value (8.6) 1 it has on ∆ E4 and still computing mod(y1 1)5 , we get, again
with r, s being unspecified functions of (x, y 1 , y 2 ) with s(0) = 0:(8.11)0 ≡ − Yx 2 + [ ]− Y 2y y1 1 1 ++ [ − Y 2y + X x](y1 2 1 (2x + g 1 ) + (y1) 1 2 (1 + g 2 ) + (y1) 1 3 s + (y1) 1 4 s ) ++ [ X y 1]((y11 ) 2 (2x + g 1 ) + (y1 1 )3 (1 + g 2 ) + (y1 1 )4 s ) +269+ [ X y 2]((y11 ) 2 [2x + g 1 ] 2 + (y 1 1 )3 (4x + 2g 1 )(1 + g 2 ) + (y 1 1 )4 (1 + s) ) ++ [ X ]( y 1 1 (2 + g1 x ) + (y1 1 )2 g 2 x + (y1 1 )3 r + (y 1 1 )4 r ) ++ [ Y 1]( y 1 1 r + (y1 1 )2 r + (y 1 1 )3 r + (y 1 1 )4 r ) ++ [ Y 2]( y1 1 r + (y1 1 )2 r + (y1 1 )3 r + (y1 1 )4 r ) ++ [ ](Yx1 2x + g 1 + y1 1 (2 + 2g2 ) + (y1 1 )2 s + (y1 1 )3 s + (y1 1 )4 s ) ++ [ Y 1y − X (x]y1 1 1 (2x + g 1 ) + (y1 1 )2 (2 + 2g 2 ) + (y1 1 )3 s + (y1 1 )4 s ) ++ [ ](Y 1y y1 2 1 [2x + g 1 ] 2 + (y1 1 )2 (2x + g 1 )(3 + 3g 2 ) + (y1 1 )3 (2 + s) + (y1 1 )4 s ) ++ [ − X y 1]((y11 ) 2 (2x + g 1 ) + (y1 1 )3 (2 + 2g 2 ) + (y1 1 )4 s ) ++ [ − X y 2]((y11 ) 2 [2x + g 1 ] 2 + (y 1 1 )3 (2x + g 1 )(3 + 3g 2 ) + (y 1 1 )4 (2 + s) ) .Collecting the coefficients of the monomials cst., y1, 1 (y1) 1 2 , (y1) 1 3 , (y1) 1 4 , weget, after slight simplification (in the coefficient of (y1) 1 2 , the term (2x +g 1 )X x annihilates with its opposite; in the coefficient of (y1 1)3 , two pairsannihilate and then, we divide by [1 + g 2 ]) a system of five linear PDE’s:(8.12)0 = −Yx 2 + (2x + g 1 )Yx 1 ,0 = −Y 2y − (2x + 1 g1 )Y 2y + (2 + 2 g1 x )X + r Y 1 + r Y 2 ++ (2 + 2g 2 )Yx 1 + (2x + g1 )Y 1y + [2x + 1 g1 ] 2 Y 1y 2,0 = −Y 2y + X 2 x + gx[1 2 + g 2 ] −1 X + r Y 1 + r Y 2 ++ s Yx 1 + 2 Y 1y − 2 X 1 x + (6x + 3g 2 )Y 1y 2,0 = s Y 2y + s X 2 x + (1 + g 2 )X y 1 + (2x + g 1 )(2 + 2g 2 )X y 2++ r X + r Y 1 + r Y 2 + s Yx 1 + s Y 1y + s X 1 x + (2 + s) Y 1y 2−− (2 + 2g 2 )X y 1 − (2x + g 1 )(3 + 3g 2 )X y 2,0 = s Y 2y 2 + s X x + s X y 1 + (1 + s)X y 2 + r X + r Y 1 + r Y 2 + s Y 1x + s Y 1y 1++ s X x + s Y 1y 2 + s X y 1 − (2 + s)X y 2.We then simplify the remainders using s + s = s, r + s = r and r + r = r; wedivide (8.12) 5 by (1 + s); we replace X y 2 obtained from (8.12) 5 in (8.12) 4 ;we divide (8.12) 4 by (1 + g 2 ); we then solve X y 1 from (8.12) 4 and finally
Page 1 and 2:
Joël M E R K E RÉcole Normale Sup
Page 3 and 4:
§1. INTRODUCTIONSeveral physically
Page 5 and 6:
e a collection of m analytic second
Page 7 and 8:
7where the indices j, l 1 vary in {
Page 9 and 10:
This phenomenon could be explained
Page 11 and 12:
This yields the prolongation of the
Page 13 and 14:
X(x, y) and Y (x, y) such that it m
Page 15 and 16:
2.23. Compatibility conditions for
Page 17 and 18:
This lemma is left to the reader; a
Page 19 and 20:
simplification nor any reordering:(
Page 21 and 22:
aleza, y por otra, las organizacion
Page 23 and 24:
computational level (differential-g
Page 25 and 26:
For instance, in the case m = 2, by
Page 27 and 28:
in (3.11). The second equation that
Page 29 and 30:
Similarly, the second equation take
Page 31 and 32:
order derivatives of X and of the Y
Page 33 and 34:
Lemma 3.32. The system yxx j = F j
Page 35 and 36:
Lemma 3.45. The following quadratic
Page 37 and 38:
often be denoted by the sign “·
Page 39 and 40:
1Now, taking account of the factor
Page 41 and 42:
conditions, totally equivalent to t
Page 43 and 44:
43remaining terms afterwards:(3.71)
Page 45 and 46:
Here, the sign ≡ precisely means:
Page 47 and 48:
Next, replacing plainly (3.64) in (
Page 49 and 50:
49the order of §3.73. We get:(3.89
Page 51 and 52:
51Multiplying by −2 and reorganiz
Page 53 and 54:
⎧Θ l 1y l 2 = −Ll 1l 1 ,l 1 ,y
Page 55 and 56:
+ 1 ∑4 δj l 1Hl k 2L k k,kk− 2
Page 57 and 58:
+ 1 ∑2 δj l 1Hl k 3M l2 ,kk+ 1 4
Page 59 and 60:
In the hardest techical part of thi
Page 61 and 62:
− 1 3+ 1 3− 1 4+ 1 4∑Hl k 1H
Page 63 and 64:
− 1 3∑kL l 1l1 ,k,x Hk l 1+ 1 3
Page 65 and 66:
Here, the sign ≡ means “modulo
Page 67 and 68:
Thirdly, put j := l 2 in (3.108) wi
Page 69 and 70:
69correct. We get:(4.29)0 =?== −
Page 71 and 72:
Next, apply the operator ∑ k Ll 2
Page 73 and 74:
73Writing term by term the substrac
Page 75 and 76:
of the terms of the subgoal (4.29):
Page 77 and 78:
77+ 1 2∑kH k l 1 ,y l 2 Hl 2k15
Page 79 and 80:
79= − X xx Yx j + Y jm∑+++++l 1
Page 81 and 82:
Our first task is to compute the de
Page 83 and 84:
Replacing this expression of A k in
Page 85 and 86:
85have the continuation(5.17) −y
Page 87 and 88:
87and where thirdly (we are nearly
Page 89 and 90:
89obtain:(5.23)III :=m∑m∑l 1 =1
Page 91 and 92:
[GTW1989] GRISSOM, C.; THOMPSON, G.
Page 93 and 94:
93Nonalgebraizable real analytic tu
Page 95 and 96:
and of CR dimension m = n − d ≥
Page 97 and 98:
coordinates z ′ = 2i ln(z/z p ),
Page 99 and 100:
{x ∈ K n : |x| < ρ} for some ρ
Page 101 and 102:
(2) A K-algebraic inversion mapping
Page 103 and 104:
(1) The complex Lie algebra Hol(M,
Page 105 and 106:
Proposition 3.1. Let t ↦→ G i (
Page 107 and 108:
The first relation gives nothing, s
Page 109 and 110:
with |β∗ k | ≥ 1 and integers
Page 111 and 112:
Clearly, the left hand side is an a
Page 113 and 114:
field X 1 ′ := h ∗ (X 1 ). Taki
Page 115 and 116:
which yields after differentiating
Page 117 and 118:
117Im w∆ n(ρ 4 )∆ n(ρ 1 )∆
Page 119 and 120:
[∂ i,ei H ei (t ′ )] t ′ =He
Page 121 and 122:
p = (w p , z p , ζ p , ξ p ) ∈
Page 123 and 124:
Finite nondegeneracy is interesting
Page 125 and 126:
such that |ω j i ∗ ,β∗ i(t,
Page 127 and 128:
for k even, we have Γ k (z (k) ) =
Page 129 and 130:
that for every local holomorphic se
Page 131 and 132:
h(t) = ˜H(t, J l 0µ 0¯h(0)) with
Page 133 and 134:
infinite families of pairwise non b
Page 135 and 136:
functions w(z)). The coefficients R
Page 137 and 138:
Then the Lie criterion states that
Page 139 and 140:
y k ′ = λk k y k and w ′ = µ
Page 141 and 142:
The last statements of Corollaries
Page 143 and 144:
[Sha2000] SHAFIKOV, R.: Analytic co
Page 145 and 146:
Here x = (x 1 , . . ., x n ) ∈ K
Page 147 and 148:
Consequently, for the case κ = 2,
Page 149 and 150:
are devoted to provide a general on
Page 151 and 152:
for l = 1, . . .,m such that the lo
Page 153 and 154:
Lemma 8.1. The following conditions
Page 155 and 156:
155namely X ←→ X + X ←→ X .
Page 157 and 158:
In terms of Sussmann’s approach [
Page 159 and 160:
x κ−1 χ κ−1 + O(|x| κ ) + O
Page 161 and 162:
Observe that these expressions are
Page 163 and 164:
where the first term I involves onl
Page 165 and 166:
I 5 = ∑ i 1I 6 = ∑ i 1 ,i 2I 7
Page 167 and 168:
U 2 U κ−1 , we obtain the five f
Page 169 and 170:
and U 2 U κ−1 , we obtain the fi
Page 171 and 172:
following equations for j = 1, . .
Page 173 and 174:
linear equations:(7.28) ⎧0 = Rx j
Page 175 and 176:
175R j containing at least one part
Page 177 and 178:
177[3] :∑σ∈S κ−1κδ l,....
Page 179 and 180:
the values of the partial derivativ
Page 181 and 182:
also appears some derivatives Q l
Page 183 and 184:
[5] F. ENGEL; LIE, S.: Theorie der
Page 185 and 186:
185Nonrigid sphericalreal analytic
Page 187 and 188:
origin:{ ( ∣ ∣ )AJ 4 1∣∣∣
Page 189 and 190:
I 2 characterizes equivalence to w
Page 191 and 192:
y means of a fundamental, elementar
Page 193 and 194:
2) When M is Levi nondegenerate at
Page 195 and 196:
195holding in C { z ′ , z ′ , w
Page 197 and 198:
Fortunately for our present purpose
Page 199 and 200:
We notice passim that S ≡ Q x (no
Page 201 and 202:
for a certain local K-analytic new
Page 203 and 204:
Conversely, if y xx (x) = F ( x, y(
Page 205 and 206:
205But we may also express the dual
Page 207 and 208:
Then thanks to a straightforward ap
Page 209 and 210:
and we then expand carefully the re
Page 211 and 212:
explicit computation, so let us rew
Page 213 and 214:
213+T ah3Q 2 a Q b∆(aa|b)∆(b|bb
Page 215 and 216:
215Vanishing Hachtroudi curvaturean
Page 217 and 218: to fix the ideas, it will be assume
Page 219 and 220: then by replacing the(so obtained)v
Page 221 and 222: and also in addition the fact that
Page 223 and 224: and this defines without ambiguity
Page 225 and 226: the leaves of this local foliation
Page 227 and 228: Then by differentiating with respec
Page 229 and 230: ∂Here, the coefficients of the2 T
Page 231 and 232: 231for (7.28):( )∂□ ·∂a □
Page 233 and 234: 233Lie symmetriesof partial differe
Page 235 and 236: Differentiating the first equation
Page 237 and 238: Example 1.21. (Continued) With n =
Page 239 and 240: defined by the graphed equations:((
Page 241 and 242: for some two local analytic maps Π
Page 243 and 244: Proof. Let l = l ( x i , y j , yβ(
Page 245 and 246: complementary views on the same obj
Page 247 and 248: Classification problem 3.11. Classi
Page 249 and 250: Definition 4.10. L is an infinitesi
Page 251 and 252: Convention 5.2. The letters R will
Page 253 and 254: Assuming that dimSYM(E 1 ) = 8, tak
Page 255 and 256: Restarting from §4.1, let ϕ a Lie
Page 257 and 258: Here, R j l 1 ,kare universal polyn
Page 259 and 260: Lemma 6.34. Let M be a submanifold
Page 261 and 262: where the expressions D β,β1 are
Page 263 and 264: Then the sum L + L is tangent to M
Page 265 and 266: Lemma 7.11. ([CM1974, BER1999, Me20
Page 267: where(7.33) ∆ := ∑1kn∂ 2∂x
Page 271 and 272: and moreover, all other, higher ord
Page 273 and 274: To conclude, we replace X xx so obt
Page 275 and 276: Definition 8.43. A real analytic hy
Page 277 and 278: Lemma 8.59. The function b depends
Page 279 and 280: where the letter r denotes an unspe
Page 281 and 282: (8.80) ⎧Y 1,1,1 = Y x 1 x 1 x 1 +
Page 283 and 284: (X 1 , X 2 , Y , Xy 1,X 2x, Y 2 x 1
Page 285 and 286: espect to x 1 and (8.96) 2 with res
Page 287 and 288: For the two unknowns Xyy 1 and X 2x
Page 289 and 290: Redeveloping the determinant, the v
Page 291 and 292: 291are obtained by equating to zero
Page 293 and 294: Let (z 0 , c 0 ) = (x 0 , y 0 , a 0
Page 295 and 296: we deduce that Γ 5 is submersive (
Page 297 and 298: 11.4. Regularity and jet parametriz
Page 299 and 300: Cramer’s rule, we get(11.13) ⎧
Page 301 and 302: in K[a, z] n+m and in K[x, c] p+m .
Page 303 and 304: of the cancellation properties (11.
Page 305 and 306: 305II: Explicit prolongations of in
Page 307 and 308: Define then the transformed jet ϕ
Page 309 and 310: Let λ ∈ N be an arbitrary intege
Page 311 and 312: 311[Ol1986], [BK1989]):(Y(1.31)⎧
Page 313 and 314: + [Y y 2 − 2 X xy ] y 1 y 2 + [
Page 315 and 316: for some nonnegative integers A, B,
Page 317 and 318: Once the correct theorem is formula
Page 319 and 320:
By the classical formula for the de
Page 321 and 322:
The induction formulas are⎧(3.4)
Page 323 and 324:
We have to compute:( ) ⎛ ⎞∑
Page 325 and 326:
Next, we gather the underlined term
Page 327 and 328:
+ ∑k 1 ,k 2 ,k 3 ,k 4[−δ k 1,k
Page 329 and 330:
Correspondingly, we identify the se
Page 331 and 332:
must be equal to the number of indi
Page 333 and 334:
Y i1 ,i 2 ,i 3 ,i 4written in one o
Page 335 and 336:
335conclusion, we have shown that (
Page 337 and 338:
337Theorem 3.73. For every κ 1 an
Page 339 and 340:
Theorem 3.79. For every integer κ
Page 341 and 342:
+++m∑l 1 ,l 2 =1m∑l 1 ,l 2 ,l 3
Page 343 and 344:
343form:(4.12)κ+1Yκ j = Y jx κ +
Page 345 and 346:
eing related to the number 2 in the
Page 347 and 348:
Appying the chain rule, we may comp
Page 349 and 350:
Secondly:(5.3)Y j i 1 ,i 2= Y jx i
Page 351 and 352:
As explained before the statement o
Page 353 and 354:
g j i 1 ,...,i λand similarly for
Page 355 and 356:
with respect to the variables x i 1
Page 357 and 358:
Assuming F = F(x, y x ) to be indep
Page 359 and 360:
359(III’) ⎧0 = ∑ (δ k 2)j 3H
Page 361 and 362:
Open problem 1.17. For n = 2 establ
Page 363 and 364:
⎧∣ ⎨X 1 xX 1+ y x 1 y x 1 ·1
Page 365 and 366:
eplacing the third column by the se
Page 367 and 368:
⎧ ∣ ∣⎫ ⎨ ∣∣∣∣∣
Page 369 and 370:
e written under the specific form:(
Page 371 and 372:
Indeed, the collection of equations
Page 373 and 374:
3.12. Principal unknowns. As there
Page 375 and 376:
375Sixthly:(3.22) ⎧δ k 1j 1Θ n+
Page 377 and 378:
are a consequence of (I’), (I”)
Page 379 and 380:
379IV: BibliographyREFERENCES[Ar198
Page 381 and 382:
[G1989] GARDNER, R.B.: The method o
Page 383 and 384:
[Me2005a] MERKER, J.: On the local
show all

Travaux sur les symÃ©tries de Lie des Ã©quations aux ... - DMA - Ens

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?