11.07.2015 Views

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

43remaining terms afterwards:(3.71) ⎧⎪⎨0 = A x + B y +⎪⎩+ A 1− B a+ 2C b− 1 3 D 2− 2 3 A 1+ 1 6 D 2+ E 3+ B a− 2C b.Here, each remaining term is also un<strong>de</strong>rlined, with a number or with a letterappen<strong>de</strong>d. For reasons of typographical readability, we never un<strong>de</strong>rline thesign, + or − of each term; however, it should be un<strong>de</strong>rstood that every termalways inclu<strong>de</strong>s its (not un<strong>de</strong>rlined) sign. Until the end of Section 4, we shalluse the roman alphabetic letters a, b, c, etc. insi<strong>de</strong> an octagon to exhibitthe vanishing terms. As readily checked by the eyes, we in<strong>de</strong>ed have −B a+B a= 0 and 2 C b−2 C b= 0. Also, until the end of Section 4, we shall usethe numbers 1, 2, 3, etc. insi<strong>de</strong> a square □ to exhibit the remaining terms,collected in a certain or<strong>de</strong>r. The numbers have the following signification:after the simplifications, the equation (3.71) may be written⎧⎨ 0 = A x + B y +(3.72)⎩ + 1 3 A − 1 6 D + E.Here, the plainly un<strong>de</strong>rlined terms A x + B y do not count in the numbering(their number is zero, for instance) and the first term of the second line 1 A 3correspond to the addition of all terms 1 in (3.69). Analogously, the secondterm − 1 D correspond to the addition of all terms 2 in (3.69). Again, this6guiding facilitates the checking of the correctness of the computation, usingsimply the eyes. No hid<strong>de</strong>n <strong>de</strong>licate computational step is “left to the rea<strong>de</strong>r”for the convenience of the writer.This principle will be constantly used until the end of Section 4; it hasbeen systematically used in [M2004] and it could be applied in various othercontexts. Again, the advantage is that it enab<strong>les</strong> to check the correctness ofall the formal computations just by reading, without having to write anythingmore. This is also useful for the author.3.73. Choice of an or<strong>de</strong>ring. Until the end of Section 4, we shall have to<strong>de</strong>al with terms G, H, L, M, Θ together with indices and partial <strong>de</strong>rivativesup to or<strong>de</strong>r two. In or<strong>de</strong>r to organize the formal expressions in a waywhich provi<strong>de</strong>s an easier <strong>de</strong>ciphering, it is convenient to introduce an or<strong>de</strong>rbetween these differential monomials. In a symbolic in<strong>de</strong>x-free notation, wechoose:(3.74) G < H < L < M < Θ.It follows for instance that G < GH < GL < HHL < HLMΘ. Also, if asum appears, we choose: GM < ∑ GM.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!