11.07.2015 Views

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Restarting from §4.1, let ϕ a <strong>Lie</strong> symmetry of (E ), namely ϕ ∆E stabilizesF ∆E . The diffeomorphism A <strong>de</strong>fined by (2.9) transforms F v to F ∆E . Conjugating,we get the self-transformation A −1 ◦ϕ ∆E ◦A of the (x, a, b)-space thatmust stabilize also the foliation F v . Equivalently, it must have expression:(6.2) [A −1 ◦ ϕ ∆E ◦ A ] (x, a, b) = ( θ(x, a, b), f(a, b), g(a, b) ) ∈ K n × K p × K m ,where, importantly, the last two components are in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt of the coordinatex, because the leaves of F v are just {a = cst., b = cst}.Lemma 6.3. To every <strong>Lie</strong> symmetry ϕ of (E ), there corresponds a transformationof the parameters(6.4) (a, b) ↦−→ ( f(a, b), g(a, b) ) =: h(a, b)meaning that ϕ transforms the local solution y a,b (x) := Π(x, a, b) to thelocal solution y h(a,b) (x) = Π(x, h(a, b)).Unfortunately, the expression of A −1 ◦ϕ ∆E ◦A does not clearly show thatf and g are in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt of x. In<strong>de</strong>ed, reminding the expressions of A andof Φ, we have:(6.5) (ϕ ∆E ◦A(x, a, b) =ϕ(x, Π(x, a, b)), Φ j(q)β(q)255(xi 1, Π j 1(x, a, b), Π j(q 1)x β(q 1 ) (x, a, b) )) .To compose with A −1 whose expression is given by (2.21), it is useful tosplit ϕ = (φ, ψ) ∈ K n × K m , so above we write(6.6) ϕ(x, Π(x, a, b)) = ( φ(x, Π(x, a, b)), ψ(x, Π(x, a, b)) ) ,and finally, droping the arguments:(6.7)[A −1 ◦ ϕ ∆E ◦ A ] (x, a, b) =(φ i , A q( φ i 1, ψ j 1, Φ j(q 1)β(q 1 )), Bj ( φ i 1, ψ j 1, Φ j(q 1)β(q 1 )) ) .In case (E ) = (E 1 ), is an exercise to verify by computations that the A q (·)and B j (·) are in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt of x. In general however, the explicit expressionof Φ j i 1 ,...,i λis unknown. Unfortunately also, nothing shows how( )f(a, b), g(a, b) is uniquely associated to ϕ(x, y). Further explanations arenee<strong>de</strong>d.6.8. Determination of parameter transformations. At first, we state ageometric reformulation of the preceding lemma.Lemma 6.9. Every <strong>Lie</strong> symmetry (x, y) ↦→ ϕ(x, y) of (E ) induces a localK-analytic diffeomorphism(6.10) (x, y, a, b) ↦−→ ( ϕ(x, y), h(a, b) )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!