11.07.2015 Views

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

Travaux sur les symétries de Lie des équations aux ... - DMA - Ens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

376Fourtly:(3.27) ⎧Θ ⎪⎨n+1y = −L j 1j1 ,y + 2 Mj 1+ 2 ∑x j 1lH j 1j 1 ,l Ml − ∑ lH l l,l M l − 1 2∑lL l j 1L j 1l+⎪⎩+ ∑ lM l Θ l + 1 2 Θn+1 Θ n+1 .These four families of partial differential equations constitute the second<strong>aux</strong>iliary system. By replacing these solutions in the three remaining familiesof equations (3.20), (3.21) and (3.22), we obtain supplementary equations(which we do not copy) that are direct consequences of (I’), (II’), (III’),(IV’).To complete the proof of the main Lemma 3.3 above, it suffices now toestablish the first implication of the following list, since the other three havebeen already established.• Some given functions G j1 ,j 2, H k 1j 1 ,j 2, L k 1j 1and M k 1of (x l 1, y) satisfy thefour families of partial differential equations (I’), (II’), (III’) and (IV’)of Theorem 1.7.⇓• There exist functions Θ j 1, Θ n+1 satisfying the second <strong>aux</strong>iliary system(3.24), (3.25), (3.26) and (3.27).⇓• These solution functions Θ j 1, Θ n+1 satisfy the six families of partialdifferential equations (3.17), (3.18), (3.19), (3.20), (3.21) and (3.22).⇓• There exist functions Π k 1j 1 ,j 2of (x l 1, y), 1 j 1 , j 2 , k 1 m + 1, satisfyingthe first <strong>aux</strong>iliary system (3.7) of partial differential equations.⇓• There exist functions X l 2, Y of (x l 1, y) transforming the systemy x j 1x j 2 = F j 1,j 2(x l 1, y, y x l 2 ), j 1 , j 2 = 1, . . ., n, to the simp<strong>les</strong>t systemY X j 1X j 2 = 0, j 1 , j 1 = 1, . . ., n.3.28. Compatibility conditions for the second <strong>aux</strong>iliary system. We noticethat the second <strong>aux</strong>iliary system is also a complete system. Thus, toestablish the first above implication, it suffices to show that the four familiesof compatibility conditions:⎧0 = ( Θ j )1− ( Θ j )1,x j 2 x⎪⎨j 3 x j 3 x j 20 = ( Θ j )1x(3.29)− ( Θ j j 12 y y)x , j 20 = ( Θ n+1 )x − ( )Θ n+1j 2⎪⎩x j 10 = ( Θ n+1x j 2x j 2)y − ( )Θ n+1yx j 1 ,x j 2 ,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!