11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

150 CHAPTER 5 <strong>Radar</strong> Applications <strong>of</strong> Sparse ReconstructionSPSRSTAPSVDTVULAsubspace pursuitsparse reconstructionspace time adaptive processingsingular value decompositiontotal variationuniform linear array.5.2 CS THEORYThe origin <strong>of</strong> the name compressed sensing lies in a particular interpretation <strong>of</strong> CS algorithmsas an approach to signal compression. Many systems sample a signal <strong>of</strong> interest ata rate above the Nyquist sampling rate dictated by the signal’s bandwidth. This sampledsignal is then transformed to a basis where a few large coefficients contain most <strong>of</strong> thesignal’s energy. JPEG2000 is an excellent example <strong>of</strong> this sort <strong>of</strong> processing, relying on awavelet transformation. The signal can then be compressed by encoding only these largesignal coefficients and their locations.Since the signal can be encoded with just a few coefficients, it seems natural to askif the relatively large number <strong>of</strong> measurements is required in the first place. The originalsampling rate was dictated by Nyquist sampling theory to guarantee the preservation <strong>of</strong>an arbitrary band-limited signal. However, perhaps one can use the knowledge that thesignal will be represented by only a few nonzero components in a known basis, such as awavelet transform, to reduce the required data acquisition. It turns out that, under certainconditions, a relatively small number <strong>of</strong> randomized or specially designed measurements<strong>of</strong> the signal can be used to reconstruct this sparse representation. The key is that we do notneed to know which coefficients are nonzero; we require knowledge only <strong>of</strong> the basis ordictionary from which these elements or atoms are drawn. In fact, in the case <strong>of</strong> noiselesssignals, this reconstruction from a reduced data set will actually be perfect! Furthermore,we shall see that the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the signal will be well-behaved both in the presence<strong>of</strong> noise and when the signal is only approximately sparse. Because a reduced data set isbeing collected and compression is accomplished through the sampling procedure itself,this process is termed compressed sensing.This combination <strong>of</strong> randomized measurements with a sparse representation formsthe heart <strong>of</strong> CS. Indeed, CS combines measurement randomization with SR to provideperformance guarantees for solving ill-posed linear inverse problems [1,2]. We will explorethe implications and interpretation <strong>of</strong> this statement at length throughout this chapter. First,we will define the problem <strong>of</strong> interest and explore its relevance to radar.5.2.1 The Linear ModelMany radar signal processing problems can be represented with a linear measurementmodel. In particular, consider an unknown complex-valued signal <strong>of</strong> interest x true ∈ C N .We collect a set <strong>of</strong> measurements <strong>of</strong> the signal y ∈ C M using a forward model or measurementoperator A ∈ C M×N with additive noise e ∈ C M , that is,y = Ax true + e (5.1)Our fundamental goal will be to solve the inverse problem <strong>of</strong> determining the vector x truefrom the noisy measurements y. As we will see, even in the noise-free case e = 0, thisproblem is nontrivial with multiple feasible solutions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!