11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

518 CHAPTER 11 Space-Time Coding for Active Antenna Systems4 sub-arrays, 4 elements per sub-array:Aim: 0ç Aim: 0ç Aim: 0ç000−10−20−30−40−50−60−70−80−80−80 −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60 80 −80 −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60 80−10−20−30−40−50−60−70−10−20−30−40−50−60−70−80−80 −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60 80Suppressed GratingLobeFIGURE 11-25 Sub-arrays and grating lobes (left: ideal full array diagram; center:sub-array diagram; right: array factor with grating lobes, sub-array diagram, and finalresulting diagram superposed) Sub-arrays and aiming oriented towards broadside direction.11.4.2 Space domain: sub-arrays and grating lobesIn the space domain, the main difficulty is to minimize the number <strong>of</strong> channels – hencethe number <strong>of</strong> sub-arrays – while still keeping the benefits <strong>of</strong> wide angle coverage. It willbe seen that sub-arrays are a good solution for pencil beams observations, but are difficultto use for wide beam applications.The phenomenon is best explained on an example, as shown in Figure 11-25, with alinear array <strong>of</strong> 4 sub-arrays, each constituted with 4 elementary radiating elements, 0.5 λapart from each other.In Figure 11-25, are successively shown (from left to right):• The diagram <strong>of</strong> the global array, each source being processed independently;• The diagram <strong>of</strong> each sub-array <strong>of</strong> 4 radiating elements (with 0 ◦ phase shift on eachradiating element);• The resulting diagram (in red), when the array is obtained as the result <strong>of</strong> the 4 subarraycoherent summation, and when the phase shifts imposed on the 4 sub-array outputscorrespond to an aiming direction equal 0 ◦ .It can be seen that the resulting diagram, which is the product <strong>of</strong> the sub-array diagram(in green) by the diagram (in blue), <strong>of</strong> the under-sampled antenna made <strong>of</strong> the 4 phasecenters <strong>of</strong> the 4 sub-arrays, is correct because the sub-array has a minimum exactly in thedirection (30 ◦ ) <strong>of</strong> the grating lobe <strong>of</strong> the under-sampled antenna (array factor constituted<strong>of</strong> the 4 phase centers <strong>of</strong> the 4 sub-arrays: blue curve).However, looking in the direction 5 ◦ , for instance, as in Figure 11-26, then the phaseshifts imposed on the outputs <strong>of</strong> the sub-arrays are changed: the result is that the gratinglobes <strong>of</strong> the array factor (blue curve) do not correspond to the minimum <strong>of</strong> the subarraydiagram anymore (green curve), and there is a residual grating lobe, in red inFigure 11-26.The way to mitigate this problem is <strong>of</strong> course to aim the sub-arrays in the aimingdirection 5 ◦ , as shown in Figure 11-27: the grating lobe is now suppressed, as in the 0 ◦aiming case.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!