11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

642 CHAPTER 14 Automatic Target RecognitionFIGURE 14-2BMP-2 vehicle atthree aspect angles:a) 0 degrees,b) 45 degrees, andc) 90 degrees.(Reproduced fromMSTAR dataset withpermission.)(a) (b) (c)the position and orientation <strong>of</strong> the candidate target (see Figure 14-2 for an example <strong>of</strong>changing target features with aspect angle). Pose estimation is useful in that it (1) isrequired for simulating complicated physical mechanisms for developing a set <strong>of</strong> modelsignatures against which to compare test images, (2) optimizes the search time by reducingthe model database that must be searched, and (3) allows more features to be exploitedin the recognition task [22]. One algorithm for pose estimation translates and rotates atarget-sized rectangular template around the image until the energy within the template ismaximized [1]. A more complex, but robust, scheme is to find closed-contour signatures<strong>of</strong> the target through segmentation and then apply four independent, but ranked, criteriafor finding the aspect angle. Three <strong>of</strong> these criteria are determined from the informationprovided within the smallest rectangle, or bounding box, completely encapsulating thetarget: target-to-background ratio (TBR), perimeter, and edge pixel count. The aspectangle yielding a rectangle with the maximum TBR within the box, minimum perimeter <strong>of</strong>the box itself, and maximizing the number <strong>of</strong> pixels on the target contour that are in a closeneighborhood to one <strong>of</strong> the major edges <strong>of</strong> the box [22]. To counter the limitations <strong>of</strong> thebounding box criteria caused by box misalignment from anomalies in the segmentationprocess, the Hough transform criteria detects straight lines in the image and the orientations<strong>of</strong> the longest three straight lines in the image <strong>of</strong> the target contour are used to approximatethe target pose [22]. Although these criteria work well, the cardinal points <strong>of</strong> 0 ◦ and 180 ◦present a generic, round-shaped signature that may require an additional procedure toidentify [22].The Hilbert-Schmidt (minimum mean-squared error) estimator is yet another method<strong>of</strong> target aspect estimation [23]. For objects on a flat surface, target orientations exist inthe special orthogonal group <strong>of</strong> dimension 2 and can be represented by a 2 × 2 matrixwith determinant one [23]. The Hilbert-Schmidt distance between two rotation matrices,A =[ ]cos θ1 − sin θ 1and B =sin θ 1 cos θ 1[ ]cos θ2 − sin θ 2, can then be expressed assin θ 2 cos θ 2d 2 HS (A, B) =‖A − B‖2 HS = tr[(A − B)T (A − B)] = 2n − 2tr[A T B]= 2n − 2tr[B T A] = 4 − 4 cos(θ 1 − θ 2 ) (14.12)where n is the dimension <strong>of</strong> the rotation matrices (i.e., 2) [23]. In this way, orientation canbe estimated by finding the orientation that minimizes the conditional mean (conditionalon the SAR image and target type) <strong>of</strong> the squared Hilbert-Schmidt distance (see [23] formore details).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!