11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.12 Problems 397[74] Romeiser, R. and Hirsch, O., “Possibilities and Limitations <strong>of</strong> Current Measurements byAirborne and Spaceborne Along-Track Interferometric SAR,” in Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the IEEEInternational Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol. 1, pp. 575–577, 2001.[75] Wikipedia. “Northrop Grumman E-8 Joint STARS.” Available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop Grumman E-8 Joint STARS.[76] Gens, R. and Vangenderen, J.L., “SAR Interferometry—Issues, Techniques, Applications,”International Journal <strong>of</strong> Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1803–1835, 1996.[77] Massonnet, D. and Feigl, K.L., “<strong>Radar</strong> Interferometry and Its Application to Changes in theEarth’s Surface,” Rev. Geophys., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 441–500, 1998.[78] Rogers, A.E.E. and Ingalls, R.P., “Venus: Mapping the Surface Reflectivity by <strong>Radar</strong> Interferometry,”Science, vol. 165, pp. 797–799, 1969.[79] Zisk, S.H., “A New Earth-Based <strong>Radar</strong> Technique for the Measurement <strong>of</strong> Lunar Topography,”Moon, vol. 4, pp. 296–300, 1972.[80] Graham, L.C., “Synthetic Interferometric <strong>Radar</strong> for Topographic Mapping,” Proceedings <strong>of</strong>the IEEE, vol. 62, pp. 763–768, June 1974.[81] Zebker, H.A. and Goldstein, R.M., “Topographic Mapping from Interferometric SAR Observations,”Journal <strong>of</strong> Geophysics Res., vol. 91, pp. 4993–4999, 1986.[82] Li, F. and Goldstein, R.M., “Studies <strong>of</strong> Multibaseline Spaceborne Interferometric SyntheticAperture <strong>Radar</strong>s,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 28, pp. 88–97,1990.[83] Richman, D., “Three Dimensional, Azimuth-Correcting Mapping <strong>Radar</strong>,” U.S. patent4,321,601, March 23, 1982.[84] Eineder, M. et al., “Spaceborne Spotlight SAR Interferometry with TerraSAR-X,” IEEE Transactionson Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1524–1535, May 2009.8.12 PROBLEMS1. Compute the approximate number <strong>of</strong> posts (points at which an elevation measurementis specified) required to cover a region measuring 10 km × 10 km for a DEM at DTEDlevels 0 through 5 and HRE levels 6 through 8.2. Consider the sensor-scatterer geometry shown in Figure 8-4. Assume the center <strong>of</strong>the sensor baseline is at altitude H = 2000 m, the ground range y 1 = 5100 m, and theelevation <strong>of</strong> scatterer P 1 is h = 73.6 m. Also assume a sensor baseline length B = 3m and a tilt angle β = 90 ◦ (vertically stacked sensors). Compute the depression angleψ 1 from the baseline center to P 1 . Next, compute the ranges R a and R b from eachsensor to P 1 . Then compute R and δR from R a and R b . Finally, use equations (8.5)and (8.2) to estimate ψ 1 and h and the percentage error in the estimate <strong>of</strong> each.3. For the geometry <strong>of</strong> problem 2, compute the ground range y 0 at which the scattererP 1 will be imaged.4. Continuing with the geometry <strong>of</strong> problem 2, the IPD measured at ground range y 0 fora 10 GHz radar (λ = 3 cm) with independent transmitters (p = 2) is φ ab = 444.0425radians. Use InSAR DEM algorithm 1 to estimate the height <strong>of</strong> the scatterer imaged aty 0 and its actual ground range; that is, estimate y 1 and ĥ (y 1 ). Compute the percentageerror in each.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!