11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14.6 Passive <strong>Radar</strong> ATR 657radar systems. Furthermore, since the majority <strong>of</strong> the cost associated with traditional radarsystems is associated with the transmitter, passive radar systems are comparatively inexpensiveto build and maintain. Although passive radar is not inherently restricted to aparticular frequency band, the allocation <strong>of</strong> bandwidth for common illuminators <strong>of</strong> opportunity(e.g., commercial TV and FM radio) serendipitously relegates most passiveradar systems to low-frequency regimes. Consequentially, their performance is not proneto substantial degradation in inclement weather, providing a tactical advantage. Anotherfortunate consequence <strong>of</strong> this association with low-frequency sources is that the longerwavelengths are well-suited for many ATR applications, such as aircraft classification[115–116]. Recall that at X-band (e.g., 10 GHz), a typical fighter plane is roughly 500wavelengths long, while at FM-band frequencies (e.g., 100 MHz), the same fighter is onlyfive wavelengths long. Where the X-band radar cross section <strong>of</strong> the aircraft is extremelysensitive to small perturbations in aircraft orientation, the FM-band radar cross section<strong>of</strong> the aircraft varies slowly and smoothly with changes in aspect, providing a featurethat varies enough to allow classification but not so much as to require high precisionprediction <strong>of</strong> aircraft orientation, which can be difficult to achieve.Even so, a number <strong>of</strong> unique challenges are associated with passive radar. The followingsub-sections describe these challenges in the context <strong>of</strong> the unified framework for ATR.14.6.1 Step 1: Identify the Target SetFirst and foremost, the target sets that are candidates for passive radar ATR are largelydictated by the illuminators <strong>of</strong> opportunity in the deployment area. As a result, these systemsare most commonly associated with urban areas in developed countries that havestringent communications regulations. Deployment in under-developed countries is difficultdue to the high noise figures that result from lax emissions regulations. Deploymentin rural (but regulated) areas is challenging due to the lack <strong>of</strong> available illuminators <strong>of</strong>opportunity. Hence, when identifying the target set, the passive radar ATR designer mustbegin by considering the available sources in the deployment area. These, in turn, dictatethe operational region (i.e., the region in which the signals from multiple transmitters canbe reliably received). The target sets are thus restricted to targets that will pass throughthis region and generate sufficient signal-to-noise ratio to be detected. The physical size <strong>of</strong>the targets (relative to the size <strong>of</strong> the illuminators’ wavelengths) must also be considered.14.6.2 Step 2: Select the Feature SetThe feature sets available to passive radar ATR systems are also somewhat limited. <strong>Radar</strong>cross section and target kinematics can be estimated over time by the passive radar ATRsystem, but additional features are difficult to collect since the system is unable to controltransmitted waveforms.14.6.3 Step 3: Observe the Feature SetSince direct path signals (i.e., those moving directly from the transmitters to the receiverwithout hitting the target) are orders <strong>of</strong> magnitude stronger than the desired target signals,deployment <strong>of</strong> passive radar receivers to adequately observe the feature set requires carefulplanning. The transmitters’ power and locations are typically known and the associatedspikes can be removed from the ambiguity function via signal processing, but the direct pathsignals raise the noise floor, potentially swamping the indirect target signals. Hence, passive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!