11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

616 CHAPTER 13 Introduction to <strong>Radar</strong> PolarimetryFIGURE 13-12<strong>Radar</strong> images(range/cross-range)<strong>of</strong> co-polarizedreturns for coatedcylinder. (FromNaishadham andPiou [51]. Withpermission.)1.510.50−0.5Coated Cylinder VVCoated Cylinder HH1.510.50−0.5−1−1−1.5−1 1 1Frequency = 4 GHz−1.5−1 1 1Theta = 90 deg−50 −45 −40 −35 −30 −25 −20 −15 −10HH polarization than VV. Therefore, variation in the target return with aspect angle,sensed as a function <strong>of</strong> the transmit and receive polarization states, provides interestingphysics-based information that can be applied to discriminate between coated and uncoatedtargets.13.4.2 Rain ClutterMuch <strong>of</strong> the clutter surrounding a target is due to objects that move relative to each other,such as ocean waves, rainfall, and foliage movement caused by wind. Clutter can appearwithin the resolution cell <strong>of</strong> the target; if it is not separated from the target return, clutter cancause missed detections and false alarms. The scattering matrix for clutter is time varyingin general, but for typical radar observation times (few ms) the matrix may be assumedconstant. Rain does not depolarize the incident wave within time scales comparable to theobservation time. Precipitation clutter is known to be very sensitive to antenna polarization,and the choice <strong>of</strong> circular polarization as a means <strong>of</strong> reducing rain clutter by as much as30 dB is widely recognized [2]. The rationale behind the use <strong>of</strong> circular polarizationis that the total return from a spatial resolution cell, within the precipitation volume, isproduced by a large number <strong>of</strong> spherically shaped hydrometeors. In theory, if a circularlypolarized wave is incident on either a conducting or dielectric sphere, the backscatteredwave has the opposite rotation sense, and polarization cancellation may be used at thereceiver to reduce the clutter from raindrops. In practice, however, the effectiveness <strong>of</strong>such cancelation <strong>of</strong> precipitation clutter is limited, ranging approximately from 10 to35 dB, since the assumption <strong>of</strong> spherical raindrops is only approximately met. Largerraindrops, approximating oblate spheroids, occur for increasing rainfall rates, and in thepresence <strong>of</strong> wind the shape may become quite asymmetrical and complex [3]. Multipathpropagation due to reflection <strong>of</strong>f land or water (e.g., sea, river, lake) surface can causesignificant depolarization <strong>of</strong> the incident wave for heavy rainfall, especially in windyconditions. Except for light rain, a significant improvement <strong>of</strong> clutter attenuation can beachieved by adaptation <strong>of</strong> antenna polarization. An improvement in clutter cancelationby about 12 dB has been reported for heavy rain using elliptical polarization (comparedwith circular) [52]. However, considering the additional complexity <strong>of</strong> radar hardware and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!