11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

710 CHAPTER 16 Human Detection With <strong>Radar</strong>: Dismount Detection16.1.3 AcronymsATR appendage-to-toe ratioCCD coherent change detectionCPI coherent processing intervalFFT fast Fourier transformGMTI ground moving target indicationHS heel strikeIED improvised explosive devicesMDV minimum detectable velocityPDF probability density functionPRI pulse repetition intervalRCS radar cross sectionSAR synthetic aperture radarSIR signal-to-interference ratioSNR signal-to-noise ratioSTAP space-time adaptive processingTL toe liftUAS unmanned aerial system16.2 CHARACTERIZING THE HUMANRADAR RETURNHumans are complicated targets due to the intricate motion <strong>of</strong> many parts, all moving atdifferent speeds and along different trajectories, depending on the type <strong>of</strong> activity engagedin, such as walking, running, jumping or playing sports [35–38]. Research has shown thathuman kinematics even change depending on whether or not a person is carrying a load,and how this load is being carried [39–41]. Indeed, some optimistic researchers haveeven stated that the periodic, bipedal nature <strong>of</strong> human walking is so unique that in thefuture human gait may be used as a biometric parameter for identification, similar to theway fingerprints and hand geometry are used today [42–44]. While the wide variation inhuman activity makes the development <strong>of</strong> a universal model characterizing human motiondifficult, it also provides a basis for the development <strong>of</strong> radar signal processing algorithmscapable <strong>of</strong> discriminating a variety <strong>of</strong> human activities.When a radar signal interacts with a target, the reflected signal depends on a number <strong>of</strong>factors, including the target’s RCS and time-varying range, among others. For rigid-bodytargets such as the chassis <strong>of</strong> a vehicle, virtually all points comprising the target move atthe same speed relative to the radar, leading to a constant Doppler shift in the frequency<strong>of</strong> the reflected signal received by the radar. If, however, there is motion, vibration, orrotation, in addition to bulk translation, then sidebands about the target’s bulk Doppler frequencyare generated [45–47]. Such micro-Doppler signals may be the result <strong>of</strong> reflectionsfrom the wheels <strong>of</strong> vehicles, aircraft propellers, and helicopter blades, as well as humanmotion.Early efforts to characterize the human micro-Doppler signature began in 1997 withwork by Weir [48,49], in which the velocity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> a human target (what Weir termeda gait velocitygram) was observed to contain distinct features that could be used to garnerinformation about the gait. Later work by Geisheimer [50] involved the use <strong>of</strong> chirplet

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!