11.07.2015 Views

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

Principles of Modern Radar - Volume 2 1891121537

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.3 Estimating Elevation Pr<strong>of</strong>iles Using <strong>Radar</strong> Echo Phase 355differential elevationĥ dif (x,y) ≡ ĥ(x,y) − h ref (x,y)= α IF[φ ab (x,y) − φ refab (x,y) ]= α IF φ difab (x,y) (8.29)It is straightforward to compute the IPD φ refab (x,y) that would be observed by our radarwhen viewing the pr<strong>of</strong>ile h ref (x,y). First, compute the depression angle ψ ref (x,y) to eachpixel using equation (8.2). Next, use that result in equation (8.12) to predict the unwrappedreference IPD φ refab (x,y).Now suppose our radar is used to newly measure a wrapped IPD ˜φ ab (x,y) <strong>of</strong> thesame scene. Assuming that ˜φ ab (x,y) could be unwrapped to obtain φ ab (x,y), an elevationestimate h ⌢ dif (x,y) could be formed using equation (8.29). However, consider the wrappedversion <strong>of</strong> φ difab (x,y):〈〉˜φ difab (x,y) = φ ab (x,y) − φ refab (x,y)=〈˜φ ab (x,y) − ˜φ refab (x,y) 〉2π = 〈˜φ ab (x,y) −The last equality indicates that the wrapped differential IPD ˜φ difab2π〈φ refab (x,y) 〉2π〉2π(8.30)can be computed bywrapping the difference between the measured IPD, which is inherently wrapped, and thewrapped reference IPD obtained from the reference DEM.The process <strong>of</strong> subtracting the wrapped reference DEM IPD from the measured IPDis called interferogram flattening. It removes the gross phase variation, leaving only thedifferential relative to the reference pr<strong>of</strong>ile. This tends to greatly reduce the number <strong>of</strong>fringes (wrapping cycles) in the data, which in turn tends to simplify phase unwrapping.The reference pr<strong>of</strong>ile is ideally an existing DEM, but the interferogram can be significantlyflattened simply by referencing it to a nominal pr<strong>of</strong>ile such as a flat earth surface (forairborne systems) or a standard Earth ellipsoid such as the World Geodetic System (WGS)84 model (for spaceborne systems) [19]. In the flat earth case, the required reference DEMIPD is the flat earth IPD <strong>of</strong> equation (8.19).Figure 8-8 illustrates the effect <strong>of</strong> interferogram flattening on the complexity <strong>of</strong> anIPD. The measured wrapped IPD ˜φ ab <strong>of</strong> Figure 8-8a shows approximately 70 rapidlyvarying fringes. This function could be unwrapped to produce an estimate <strong>of</strong> φ ab, whichcould then be used in algorithm 1 or 2 to estimate ĥ. However, Figure 8-8b shows theresult <strong>of</strong> estimating instead the wrapped differential IPD ˜φ difab by referencing the measuredwrapped IPD ˜φ ab to the WGS 84 smooth surface earth model using equation (8.30). ˜φ difabmust still be unwrapped to estimate ˆφ difab and then ĥ dif and ĥ, but now the number <strong>of</strong>fringes that must be unwrapped is reduced to about 9 or 10. Figure 8-8c references theIPD to an existing DEM <strong>of</strong> the same area, and the number <strong>of</strong> fringes is further reduced toabout four. Because <strong>of</strong> this reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> fringes, it is common to flatten theinterferogram before phase unwrapping.8.3.7 Range Foreshortening and LayoverStandard SAR image formation processing is designed to assume that all echoes originatefrom a two-dimensional flat surface. Equivalently, the three-dimensional world is projected

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!