Li et al: MET amplification in liver tumorsAcknowledgmentsWe thank Ragai Mitry, Teresa Ruffalo and AnnaLublinsky for their excellent technical support. We wouldalso like to thank The Pedersen Family CharitableFoundation for their financial support with this research.ReferencesAnbazhagan R., Tihan T, Bornman DM, Johnston JC, Saltz JH,Weigering A, Piantadosi S, Gabrielson E. (1999)Classification of small cell lung cancer and pulmonarycarcinoid by gene expression profiles. Cancer Res 59, 5119-5122.Arbuthnot P, Kew M, Fitschen W. (1991) c-fos and c-myconcoprotein expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma.Anticancer Res 11, 921-924.Bottaro DP, Rubin JS, Faletto DL, Chan AM-L, Kmiecik TE,Vande Woude GF, Arronson SA. (1991) Identification of thehepatocyte growth factor receptor as the met proto-oncogeneproduct. Science 251, 802-804.De Souza AT, Hankins GR, Washington MK, Fine RL, OrtonTC, Jirtle RL. (1995) Frequent loss of heterozygosity on 6qat the mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor IIreceptor locus in human hepatocellular tumors. Oncogene10, 1725-1729.Dean M, Park M, Le Beau MM, Robins TS, Diaz MO, RowleyJD, Blair DG, Vande Woude GF. (1985) The human metoncogene is related to the tyrosine kinase oncogenes. Nature318, 385-388.Di Renzo MF, Narsimhan RP, Olivero M, Bretti S, Giordano S,Medico E, Gaglia P, Zara P, Comoglio PM. (1991)Expression of the met/HGF receptor in normal and neoplastichuman tissues. Oncogene 6, 1997-2003.Di Renzo MF, Olivero M, Giacomini A, Porte H, Chastre E,Mirossay L, Nordlinger B, Bretti S, Bottardi S, Giodarno S.(1995) Overexpression and amplification of the met/HGFreceptor gene during the progression of colorectal cancer.Clin Cancer Res 1, 147-154.Fischer U, Muller H-W, Sattler H-P, Feiden K, Zang KD, MeeseE. (1995) Amplification of the met gene in glioma. <strong>Gene</strong>sChromosom Cancer 12, 63-65.Giordano S, Ponzetto C, Di Renzo MF, Cooper CS, ComoglioPM. (1989) Tyrosine kinase receptor indistinguishable fromthe c-met protein. Nature 339, 155-156.Hacia JG. (1999) Resequencing and mutational analysis usingoligonucleotide microarrays. Nat <strong>Gene</strong>t 21 (1 suppl), 42-47.Müller U, Bao P, Che D, et al. (2002) DNA-Chips in the analysisof genetic aberrations. Springer Laboratory Manual FISHTechnology ed. Rautenstrasse BW, Liehr T, Springer Verlag,Heidelberg, Germany.Murakami Y, Hayashi K, Hirohashi S, et al. (1991) Aberrationsof the tumor suppressor p53 and retinoblastoma genes inhuman hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 52, 5520-5525.Nishida N, Fukuda Y, Kokuryu H, Sadamoto T, Isowa G, HondaK, Yamaoka Y, Ikenaga M, Imura H, Ishizaki K. (1992)Accumulation of allelic loss of arms of chromosomes 13q,16q and 17p in the advanced stages of human hepatocellularcarcinoma. Int J Cancer 51, 862-868.Nishida N, Fukuda Y, Komeda T, Kita R, Sando T, Furukawa M,Amenomori M, Shibagaki I, Nakao K, Ikenaga M. (1994)Amplification and overexpression of the cyclin D1 gene inagrressive human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 54,3107-3110.Park M, Dean M, Cooper CS, Schmidt M, O’Brien SJ, Blair DG,,Vande Woude GF. (1986) Mechanism of met oncogeneactivation. Cell 45, 895-904.Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D,Collins C, Kuo W-L, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee S, Ljung B-M, Gray JW, Albertson DG. (1998) High resolution analysisof DNA copy number variation using comparative genomichybridization to microarrays. Nat <strong>Gene</strong>t 20, 207-211Ponzetto C, Giordano S, Peverali F, Della Valle G, Abate ML,Vaula G, Comoglio PM. (1991) c-met is amplified but notmutated in a cell line with an activated met tyrosine kinase.Oncogene 6, 553-559.Rogler CE, Sherman M, Su CY, Shafritz DA, Summers J, ShowsTB, Henderson A, Kew M. (1985) Deletion in chromosome11p associated with a hepatitis B integration site inhepatocellular carcinoma. Science 230, 319-322.Sgroi D, Teng S, Robinson G, LeVanglie R, Hudson JR, Jr,Elkahloun AG. (1999) In vivo gene expression profileanalysis of human breast cancer progression. Cancer Res 59,5656-5661.Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, Nickolenko J,Benner A, Dohner H, Crmer T, Lichter P. (1997) Matrixbasedcomparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screenfor genomic imbalances. <strong>Gene</strong>s Chromosom Cancer 20,399-407.Soman NR, Wogan GN, Rhim JS. (1990) TPR-MET oncogenicrearrangement: detection by polymerase chain reactionamplification of the transcript and expression in humantumor cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87, 739-742.Tamatani T., Hattori K., Iyer A., Tamatani K, Oyasu R. (1999)Hepatocyte growth factor is an invasion/migration factor ofrat urothelial carcinoma cells in vitro. Carcinogenesis 20,957-962.Teramoto T, Satonaka K, Kitazawa S, Fujimori T, Hayashi K,Maeda S. (1994) p53 gene abnormalities are closely relatedto hepatovirus infections and occur at a late stage ofhepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res 54, 231-235.Zhang X, Xu H-J, Murakami Y, Sachse R, Yashima K,Hirohasha S, Hu S-X, Benedict WF, Sekiya T. (1994)Deletions of chromosome 13q, mutations in Retinoblastoma1, and retinoblastoma protein state in human hepatocellularcarcinoma. Cancer Res 54, 4177-4182.102
<strong>Gene</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> and <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> Vol 7, page 103<strong>Gene</strong> Ther Mol Biol Vol 7, 103-111, 2003HMG-CoA-reductase inhibition-dependent and -independent effects of statins on leukocyte adhesionResearch ArticleTriantafyllos Chavakis 1,2* , Thomas Schmidt-Wöll 2 , Peter. P. Nawroth 1 , Klaus T.Preissner 2 , Sandip M. Kanse 21 Department of Internal Medicine I, University Heidelberg and 2 Institute for Biochemistry, Justus-Liebig-Universität,Giessen, Germany__________________________________________________________________________________*Correspondence: Dr. T. Chavakis, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Heidelberg, Bergheimer Strasse 58, D-69115Heidelberg, Germany; tel.: ++49 6221 56 4776; fax: ++49 6221 56 ; email: triantafyllos.chavakis@med.uni-heidelberg.deKey words: leukocyte, adhesion, β2-integrins, urokinase-receptor, statins, lovastatin, HMG-CoA reductaseAbbreviations: BSA, bovine serum albumin, FBG, fibrinogen, HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A, ICAM-1,intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, PBS, phosphate buffered saline, uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator , uPAR, urokinasetypeplasminogen activator receptor, VN, vitronectinReceived: 1 July 2003; Accepted: 10 July 2003; electronically published: July 2003SummaryStatins are inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductase, a key enzyme forcholesterol biosynthesis and isoprenoid intermediates. Increasing evidence suggests that statins might affectinflammatory processes including leukocyte recruitment, yet, the underlying mechanisms are not defined. In thisstudy two different pathways for inhibition of leukocyte adhesion by statins are described. (i) Coincubation withlovastatin inhibited adhesion of LFA-1 (CD11a/CD18, αLβ2)-transfected K562 cells to ICAM-1 and of p150.95(CD11c/CD18, αXβ2)-transfected K562 cells to both ICAM-1 and fibrinogen (FBG), whereas adhesion of Mac-1(CD11b/CD18, αMβ2)-transfected K562 cells was not affected. Moreover, only LFA-1-mediated adhesion to ICAM-1 but not Mac-1-mediated adhesion to FBG or urokinase-receptor (uPAR)-me di ate d adhesion to vitronectin (VN)of myelo-monocytic U937 cells was blocked by coincubation with lovastatin. The antiadhesive effect of lovastatinwas independent of HMG-CoA-reductase inhibition, as it was not reversible in the presence of mevalonate, farnesylpyrophosphateor geranyl-pyrophosphate. In purified systems, lovastatin only blocked the ICAM-1/LFA-1interaction but not the ICAM-1/Mac-1, FBG/Mac-1 or the VN/uPAR interactions. (ii) In contrast, preincubation ofU937 cells for up to 18 h with lovastatin completely abrogated LFA-1-, Mac-1- and uPAR-dependent cell adhesionto the respective ligands. This anti-adhesive function of lovastatin was dependent on HMG-CoA reductaseinhibition, since mevalonate or the isoprenoid intermediates restored adhesion, while no downregulation of integrinoruPAR-expression was observed. Thus, two distinct pathways, involving a direct interaction with LFA-1 andp150.95 and an indirect inhibition of cell adhesion through disruption of cholesterol and/or isoprenoid metabolitebiosynthesis are induced by statins. These functions can explain at least in part the inhibition of leukocyte adhesionand the associated antiinflammatory role of statinsI. IntroductionWhen leukocytes emigrate from the blood-streaminto sites of inflammation or injury, they undergo acomplex sequence of adhesion and locomotion stepsrequiring the expression and upregulation of variousadhesion receptors on the surface of leukocytes andvascular cells. During their transmigration phaseleukocytes adhere to provisional matrix substrates such asfibrinogen (FBG), fibronectin or vitronectin (VN) at sitesof increased vascular permeability or damage. Theprominent adhesion receptors on leukocytes are integrins,such as VLA-4 (α4β1), that can bind to fibronectin,whereas adhesion to FBG is mediated by the β2 integrinsMac-1 (CD11b/CD18, αMβ2, CR3) and p150.95(CD11c/CD18). Mac-1 together with LFA-1(CD11a/CD18, αLβ2) also provide firm adhesion to andtransmigration through the endothelium by recognition oftheir counter-receptor ICAM-1 on endothelial cells;evidence exists that p150.95 binds ICAM-1 as well(Springer, 1994; Carlos and Harlan, 1994; Stewart et al,1995; Blackford et al, 1996; Gahmberg, 1997). Thefunctional properties of integrins in general can bemodulated by lateral (cis) interaction with integrin103