Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapytumor environment (Heuze-Vourc’h et al, 2003). Thesefindings suggest the potential efficacy of COX-2 targetedgene therapy, and offer new targets for the furtherdevelopment of prevention and therapy.3. Galectin-3Galectin-3, a member of the β-galactoside-bindinganimal lectins, was recently identified as a key factor intumor metastasis in NSCLC cancer (Yoshimura et al,2003). Galectin-3 has been implicated in tumor invasionand metastasis (Inohara et al, 1998). Compared withhealthy individuals, Galectin-3 serum levels in patientswith lung cancer and some other cancers weresignificantly elevated, especially in patients withmetastatic disease (Iurisci et al, 2000). In vitroexperiments have suggested that Galectin-3 expressionmay play a role in NSCLC cell motility, invasion, andmetastasis (O’Driscoll et al, 2002). A population (10/30)of the NSCLC samples from cell lines and biopsy tissuewere found to overexpress the Galectin-3 protein at levelsthree times higher than those of normal epithelial cells(Yoshimura et al, 2003). Accordingly, Galectin-3 mayrepresent a novel target molecule in NSCLC therapy.Multiple genes are implicated in lung cancerdevelopment and progression to malignancy. Preliminarystudies have proven the tumor suppressor activity of thesenew candidates, such as ganglioside G(D2) (Yoshida et al,2001; Chen et al, 2003), uteroglobin (Lee et al, 2003) andseveral genes in the human chromosome 3p21.3 (Ji et al,2002). However, further investigation is necessary toresolve a number of uncertainties before human trials canbegin.III. Suicide gene therapyA. HSV-tkAlthough the Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV)thymidine kinase (tk) suicide gene together withganciclovir (GCV) have been successfully used for the invivo treatment of various solid tumors in recent clinicaltrials, a careful assessment and improvement of theefficacy and safety of such a strategy in different tissues inanimal models of human lung cancer is essential beforethey can be used clinically. With the aim of establishing aneffective therapy for pleural metastasis of lung cancer,liposome-mediated transfer of HSK-tk was performed in anude mice model. Direct eradication together with abystander effect contributed to a therapeutic outcome(Nagamachi et al, 1999). Using an orthotopic lung cancermodel employing immunocompetent mice, Fukunaga et al,(2002) have assessed the therapeutic potential ofadenovirus-mediated HSV-tk. Prolonged survival rateswere obtained in mice treated with adenovirally HSV-tktransfectedtumor cells, and were related to genetransduction efficiencies.In order to obtain the specific transduction of HSVtkinto human lung cancer cells, several tumor-specificpromoters have been evaluated. In vitro and ex vivoexperiments have demonstrated the specific expression ofusing gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) promoter in SBC5human SCLC cell line, in which GRP mRNA expressionwas detected (Inase et al, 2000). However, anotherexperiment on the same cell line showed that neuronspecific enolase (NSE) was not optimal for use in suicidegene transfer to SCLC cells, although NSE mRNA wasexpressed more abundantly in the SBC3 human SCLC cellline than in other cancer cell lines (Tanaka et al, 2001).Myc-Max response element demonstrated potential forspecific expression of HSV-tk in any myc- overexpressingSCLC cells (Kumagai et al, 1996; Nishino et al, 2001). Invivo injections with Ad-MycTK followed by GCVadministration selectively and markedly suppressed thegrowth of myc-overexpressing tumors established in thesubcuties or in the peritoneal cavity of athymic mice; andin contrast to treatment with Ad-CATK, which conferredstrong but nonspecific expression of HSV-tk, no apparentside effects were observed (Nishino et al, 2001). Theseresults emphasis the importance of cell type-specificpromoter selection to target different subpopulations.Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) promoter isanother practical choice to reduce toxicity to normal cells,because CEA is found in lung and other cancers (Konishiet al, 1999; Goto et al, 2001). Goto et al, (2001) exploiteda Cre recombinase(Cre)/loxP system consisting of twoadenoviral vectors (one expressing the Cre gene under thecontrol of the CEA promoter (Ad.CEA-Cre), and the otherthe herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK)gene) to provide a sutilized Cre recombinase(Cre)/loxPsystem to enhance antitumor effects together with minimaladverse reactions in HSV-tk gene therapy againstdisseminated CEA-producing cancer cells in the peritonealcavity of mice. This provided an effective tool againstdisseminated cancer cells without significant side effects.Modification of the HSV-tk gene itself or theprodrug should offer a practical way of improving thistherapeutic system. Delivery of the HSV-TK mutant TK30in a VSV-G pseudotyped retroviral vector, which wasfound to enhance the efficacy of prodrug therapy, provideda therapeutic efficacy after subsequent GCV application inhuman NSCLC cell lines in a preclinical murinexenotransplant model (Kurdow et al, 2002). Recently, twoHSV-tk mutants transferred by adenoviral vector showedmore tumor growth inhibition than the wild-type whentested in several cell lines, including human lung cancerand in their flank tumor models (Wiewrodt et al, 2003).On the other hand, a novel guanosin analog A-5021, whichcan be used more safely than GCV, demonstratedcytotoxic activity as potent as that of GCV in response toretroviral mediated HSV-tk-transduced human lung cancercell lines, but did not exhibit a inhibitory effect on bonemarrow progenitor cells and colony formation (Hasegawaet al, 2000).B. New targets and approaches1. Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferaseLike HSV-tk, the newly-discovered enzymehypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase(HGPRT), expressed by the parasite Trypanosoma brucei260
<strong>Gene</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> and <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> Vol 7, page 261(Tb), can serve as a suicide gene, as it convertsallopurinol, a purine analogue, to a cytotoxic metabolite.Retrovirus-mediated TbHGPRT expression can sensitizefive NSCLC cell lines to allopurinol to levels 2.1 to 7.6higher than control values, and represents a practicalapproach in lung cancer therapy (Trudeau et al, 2001).2. Thyroperoxidase-mediated retention ofradioiodideIn much the same way as such gene-prodrugtreatment strategy, the sodium iodide symporter (NIS)gene, that allows rapid internalization of iodide into cells,can be used to obtain radionuclide accumulation byradioactive iodide administration for tumor cell killing. Acombination of the NIS gene and the thyroperoxidase(TPO) gene, which can catalyze iodination of protein,resulted in an augmentation of radioiodide uptake andretention and subsequent effective tumor cell death intransfected NSCLC cell lines (Huang et al, 2001).Although there have so far been few reports on thetreatment of lung cancer with NIS gene, it promises to bean effective approach for cancer treatment.IV. AntiangiogenesisTargeting angiogenesis is an attractive strategy totreat cancer. As progressive growth and metastasis of solidtumors is dependent on the formation of new blood vessels(Folkman, 1971), antiangiogenic therapy is a broadspectrum treatment for cancer. Two strategies used in thedevelopment of antiangiogenic agents involve therapywith endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis as well as theinhibition of proangiogenic factors.A. Endogenous inhibitors of angiogenesis1. EndostatinEndostatin, a 20-kDa C-terminal fragment ofcollagen XVIII (O’Reilly et al, 1997), is the leadingmember of a class of physiologic inhibitors ofangiogenesis with potent antitumor activity. Boehm et al,(1997) have also reported that when three different mousetumors were subjected to chronic, intermittent therapywith endostatin, there were no traces of acquiredresistance. To establish a constant therapeuticconcentration of circulating endostatin, investigations intoendogenetic expression by a gene therapy approach havebeen prompted. Many viral vectors are actively understudy in endostatin delivery. After systemic administrationof a recombinant adenovirus to nude mice, persistent highserum levels of murine endostatin were achieved. Theendostatin vector treatment not only resulted in significantreduction of the growth rates and volumes of Lewis lungcarcinoma, but also completely prevented the formation ofpulmonary micrometastases (Sauter et al, 2000).Intramuscular injection of adeno-associated viral vectorexpressing human endostatin led to a sufficient level ofserum endostatin to inhibit angiogenesis and tumor growth(Shi et al, 2002). High-level endostatin was also detectedin the vasculature of mice in which hematopoietic stemcells were implanted after being transduced by retrovirusencoding a secretable form of endostatin (Pawliuk et al,2002). In addition, Lentiviral vector (Shichinohe et al,2001) and Semliki Forest viral vector (Yamanaka et al,2001) have been developed to express endostatin, andwere first evaluated in T24 human bladder cancer cells andmice bearing B 16 brain tumor respectively. Some othernonviral transgene delivery approaches also involveendostatin transfer. Utilizing cationic vector, Nakashima etal, (2003) found that intravenous endostatin gene deliverysignificantly inhibited murine lung metastases.Intramuscular injection of polymerized endostatin plasmidinhibited syngeneic tumor growth and lung metastases inmice (Blezinger et al, 1999), and was also shown to inhibitmurine metastatic brain tumor growth (Oga et al, 2003).When electroporation was used to enhance endostatin genetransfer into muscle tissues, the electrotransfer resulted inreduced numbers of experimental melanoma metastases inthe lungs, while intratumoral electrotransfer significantlyinhibited tumor growth (Cichon et al, 2002). Recently,engineered Bifidobacterium, a type of nonpathogenicanaerobic bacterial vector, was applied to bear endostatinby Li X et al, (2003), who demonstrated that vectorscentered in tumors only, and inhibited local tumor growthafter delivery by tail vein injection.2. AngiostatinAngiostatin is another specific endogenous inhibitorof endothelial cell proliferation. It is an internal fragmentof plasminogen, isolated from the urine of mice bearingLewis lung carcinoma (LLC) (O’Reilly et al, 1994).Tanaka et al, (1998) have demonstrated that retroviral andadenoviral vectors transducing angiostatin cDNA can beused to inhibit endothelial cell growth in vitro andangiogenesis in vivo. In a pulmonary metastatic breastcancer model, the delivery of Ad-angiostatin (1x10 9 pfu)to the lung significantly delayed tumor growth, asmeasured by the number of visible surface tumor nodules(Gyorffy et al, 2001). Intratumoral injection of a high-titerAAV-angiostatin vector effectively suppressed tumors andresulted in long-term survival in 40% of a group of treatedrats, whereas the control AAV-GFP vector had notherapeutic benefits (Ma et al, 2002a). As angiostatin is anendogenous internal fragment of plasminogen, effectivesystemic gene therapy could be obtained by angiostatingene transfer. Studies on liposome-coated plasmidcarrying murine and human angiostatin showed that repeatintraperitoneal vector injection resulted in tumor growthsuppression and delay in the onset of tumor growth to thesame degree as intratumoral injection in a nude micemelanoma xenograft model (Rodolfo et al, 2001). <strong>Gene</strong>transfer of AAV-angiostatin via the portal vein led tosignificant suppression of the growth of both nodular andmetastatic EL-4 lymphoma tumors established in the liver,and prolonged the survival time of the mice (Xu et al,2003). Similar long-term therapeutic effects have alsobeen demonstrated by Ma et al, (2002b), who used a singlei.m. injection of AAV-angiostatin to effectively suppresshuman glioma growth in the brain of nude mice. Thegeneration of angiostatin from endogenous plasminogen261
- Page 7 and 8:
Instructions to authors:Gene Therap
- Page 9:
Please submit an electronic version
- Page 12:
103-111 ResearchArticle113-133 Revi
- Page 17 and 18:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 19 and 20:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 21 and 22:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 23 and 24:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 25 and 26:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 27 and 28:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 29 and 30:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 31 and 32:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 33 and 34:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 35 and 36:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 37 and 38:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 39 and 40:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 41 and 42:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 43 and 44:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 45 and 46:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 47 and 48:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 49 and 50:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 51 and 52:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 53 and 54:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 55 and 56:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 57 and 58:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 59 and 60:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 61 and 62:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 63 and 64:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 65 and 66:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 67 and 68:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 69 and 70:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 73 and 74:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 75 and 76:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 77:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 80 and 81:
Epperly et al: Late injection of Mn
- Page 82 and 83:
Epperly et al: Late injection of Mn
- Page 84 and 85:
Goldberg-Cohen et al: Regulation of
- Page 86 and 87:
Goldberg-Cohen et al: Regulation of
- Page 88 and 89:
Goldberg-Cohen et al: Regulation of
- Page 90 and 91:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 92 and 93:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 94 and 95:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 96 and 97:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 98 and 99:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 100 and 101:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 102 and 103:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 104 and 105:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 106 and 107:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 108 and 109:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 110 and 111:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 112 and 113:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 114 and 115:
Li et al: MET amplification in live
- Page 116 and 117:
Li et al: MET amplification in live
- Page 118 and 119:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 120 and 121:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 122 and 123:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 124 and 125:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 126 and 127:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 128 and 129:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 130 and 131:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 132 and 133:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 134 and 135:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 136 and 137:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 138 and 139:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 140 and 141:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 142 and 143:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 144 and 145:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 146 and 147:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 148 and 149:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 150 and 151:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 152 and 153:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 154 and 155:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 156 and 157:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 158 and 159:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 160 and 161:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 162 and 163:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 164 and 165:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 166 and 167:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 168 and 169:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 170 and 171:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 172 and 173:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 174 and 175:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 176 and 177:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 178 and 179:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 180 and 181:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 182 and 183:
Xu et al: G-CSF receptor-mediated S
- Page 184 and 185:
Xu et al: G-CSF receptor-mediated S
- Page 186 and 187:
Xu et al: G-CSF receptor-mediated S
- Page 188 and 189:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 190 and 191:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 192 and 193:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 194 and 195:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 196 and 197:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 198 and 199:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 200 and 201:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 202 and 203:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 204 and 205:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 206 and 207:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 208 and 209:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 210 and 211:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 212 and 213:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 214 and 215:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 216 and 217:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 218 and 219:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 220 and 221:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 222 and 223:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 224 and 225: David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 226 and 227: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 228 and 229: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 230 and 231: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 232 and 233: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 234 and 235: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 236 and 237: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 238 and 239: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 240 and 241: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 242 and 243: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 244 and 245: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 246 and 247: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 248 and 249: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 250 and 251: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 252 and 253: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 254 and 255: Zeng: PRL-3 as a target for cancer
- Page 256 and 257: Zeng: PRL-3 as a target for cancer
- Page 258 and 259: Zeng: PRL-3 as a target for cancer
- Page 260 and 261: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 262 and 263: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 264 and 265: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 266 and 267: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 268 and 269: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 270 and 271: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 272 and 273: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 276 and 277: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 278 and 279: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 280: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 283 and 284: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 285 and 286: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 287 and 288: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 289 and 290: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 291 and 292: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 293 and 294: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 295 and 296: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 297 and 298: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 299 and 300: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 301 and 302: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 303 and 304: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 305 and 306: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 307 and 308: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 309: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology