Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapyBcl2-mediated apoptotic block undergo a drug-inducedcytostasis involving the accumulation of p53, p16(INK4a), and typically acquire p53 or INK4a mutationsupon progression to a terminal stage (Schmitt et al, 2002).Bax (Kagawa et al, 2000) and Bak (Pataer et al, 2000)retained an impressive antitumor ability in the absence ofchemotherapeutic drugs, and were able to effectively killboth p53-sensitive and p53-resistant tumors in vitro and invivo. To avoid their toxicity to the packaging cell line, abinary adenoviral vector system was used. Usui et al,(2003) used the Cre-loxP system to propagateadenoviruses expressing the N-terminally truncated Bax(ΔN Bax), which was not blocked by Bcl-2 or Bcl-xl, andintratumoral injection into nude mice showed asignificantly stronger suppression of tumor growth (74%)than full-length Bax (25%). The synergic effects of Baxand tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducingligand (TRAIL) were evaluated by human telomerasereverse transcriptase promoter-driven and adenovirusmediatedgene expression in vitro and in vivo, and it wasfound that combined Bax and TRAIL therapy producedmore profound cell killing in human lung cancer lineH1299 and prolonged survival in mice with ovarian cancerxenograft (Huang et al, 2002). As these are strongproapoptotic genes, targeted expression of the genes ishighly desirable when they are used as a therapeutic agent.When Bax was expressed under the control of humanvascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoter,adenovirus-mediated overexpression of Bax resulted inapoptosis in human lung cancer cells and also in normalhuman bronchial epithelial cells (Kaliberov et al, 2002).Like Bax, BID also counters the protective effect ofBCL2. Sax et al, (2002) suggested that BID was a p53-responsive ‘chemosensitivity gene’ that may enhance celldeath response to chemotherapy. Fukazawa et al, (2003)noted adenoviral Bid overexpression could induceapoptosis in NSCLC cell lines and enhancechemosensitivity in the absence of p53. The function ofBCL2 could also be blocked by silencing this gene withtriplex forming oligonucleotides (TFO) (Shen et al,2003a), or by down-regulation of its transcripts usingantisense oligonucleotides (Buck et al, 2002).2. p21 and MycActivation of the tumor suppressor p53 by DNAdamage induces either cell cycle arrest or apoptotic celldeath. The cytostatic effect of p53 is mediated bytranscriptional activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase(CDK) inhibitor p21(Cip1) (Bunz et al, 1998). In vitroexperiments have suggested that p21 could serve as amarker for biological response to p53 gene therapy (Tangoet al, 2002; Choi et al, 2000; Dubrez et al, 2001). A similarresult was later obtained from biopsy examinations: p21expression was up-regulated in NSCLC patients aftertreatment, especially when injections of higher doses ofp53-expressing adenovirus were combined withsimultaneous chemotherapy (Boulay et al, 2000). Joshi etal, (1998) have provided preliminary evidence for growthinhibition of NSCLC by p21WAF1 adenoviral genetransfer in vitro and in vivo. Myc was involved in thisapoptotic signaling in response to DNA damage byselectively inhibiting bound p53 from activatingp21(Cip1) transcription (Seoane et al, 2002).Downregulating c-myc expression by the combinationtreatment of c-myc antisense DNA with all-trans-retinoicacid resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation of small celllung cancer in vitro (Akie et al, 2000). In a Lewis lungsyngeneic drug-resistant murine tumor model,chemotherapeutic drugs in combination with c-Mycinhibition (which was specifically achieved by using nontoxicantisense DNA chemistry) suppressed tumor growthdramatically, but only with a regimen in which cisplatin ortaxol treatment preceded the antisense compound (Knappet al, 2003).3. mda-7It has been reported that adenoviral-mediatedoverexpression of the mda-7 gene exhibited cancer cellspecificgrowth inhibition irrespective of the status ofother tumor suppressor genes, such as p53, RB, and p16(Mhashilkar et al, 2001). When this attractive gene wasused in lung cancer, similar results were noted in NSCLCcells in which the product of the transgene induced G2/Mcell cycle arrest and an increase of Bax and Bak (Saeki etal, 2000). The induction of apoptosis was associated withactivation of specific caspase cascades (Saeki et al, 2000;Pataer et al, 2002). In vivo studies correlated well with invitro inhibition of lung tumor cell proliferation andendothelial cell differentiation mediated by Ad-mda7.Besides its proapoptotic properties, Ad-mda7 alsodemonstrated antiangiogenic abilities (Saeki et al, 2002).As a potent radiosensitizer, Ad-mda7 has been shown toenhance the radiation sensitivity of NSCLC cells, but notof normal human lung fibroblast lines (Kawabe et al,2002). A Phase I/II dose-escalation trial of intratumoralinjection with a replication-deficient adenovirus vector,Ad-mda7 (INGN 241), will be performed in combinationwith radiation therapy in patients with locally recurrentbreast cancer (http: //www4.od.nih.gov/oba/rac/PROTOCOL.pdf).4. Fas/Fas ligandThe interaction between Fas and Fas ligand (FasL) isinvolved in the apoptotic death of a number of cells,including lymphocytes. Hahne et al, (1996) proposed thatFasL-expressing melanoma cells might induce apoptosisof Fas-sensitive tumor infiltrating cells. Human lungcancer cells have been shown to express FasL, enablingthem to destroy T lymphocytes expressing Fas (Niehans etal, 1997). Moreover, apoptotic FasL-expressing tumorcells suppressed antitumor immunity, in contrast to thepotent tumor-specific protective immunity generated byviable FasL-expressing tumors (Tada, 2003). Direct invivo transfection of antisense FasL produced a systemicdecrease in soluble FasL, and reduced tumor growth andinvasion (Nyhus et al, 2001). However, membrane-boundFasL had opposite effects. Tada et al, (2002) demonstratedthat forced expression of membrane-bound FasL in murinelung carcinoma cells produced anti-tumor effects through258
<strong>Gene</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> and <strong>Molecular</strong> <strong>Biology</strong> Vol 7, page 259an apoptotic mechanism by Fas/FasL interaction.Adenoviral infection with the Fas-associated death domainprotein gene in lung cancer cell lines resulted in activationof caspase-8 and dose-dependent apoptosis (Kim et al,2003). Shin et al, (2002) noted that the inactivatingmutations of the genes in the pathway of Fas-mediatedapoptosis were associated with nodal metastasis inNSCLC. Using adenoviral vectors to restore wild-type p53function in a human lung cancer cell line, Thiery et al,(2003) reported that this restored not only Fas expressionbut also the Fas-mediated apoptotic pathway, andsuggested that the wt p53-induced optimization of tumorcell killing by specific CTL may involve at least in part aFas-mediated pathway via induction of Fas expression bytumor cells. Wt p53-dependent Fas-mediated apoptosis hasbeen reconfirmed in human cancer cells expressing atemperature-sensitive p53 mutant (Li et al, 2003).C. Growth factor pathway targetsContinuous growth of tumors depends on the alteredregulation of the cell cycle, which is in turn modulated bysignals from growth factors and their receptors, whichprovide the therapeutic targets.Growth factors directly inactivating a criticalcomponent of the cell-intrinsic death machinery may resultin continuous tumor growth. Bad, a heterodimeric partnerfor Bcl-XL and Bcl-2, displaces Bax and promotes celldeath (Yang et al, 1995). It links p53 pathways with AKTand MAPK pathways, as phosphorylation of Bad by AKTor MAPK-activated kinases (Rsks) blocks pro-apoptoticactivity to promote cell survival (Datta et al, 1997; Bonniet al, 1999). An in vitro model of variant differentiation inSCLC, which was chemo- and radio-resistant, elevatedactivation of AKT and MAP kinase associated withincreased levels of phosphorylated BAD and activated NFκB(Kraus et al, 2002). Therapeutic modalities thatovercome the antiapoptotic function of AKT and Rsks areexpected to be a novel strategy for lung cancer treatment.A combination of Bad with Bax resulted in a successfultreatment in experimental tumor models (Zhang et al,2002). IκBα, a specific inhibitor of NF-κB, has also beenshown to be able to increase cytotoxicity in lung cancercells (Batra et al, 1999). In addition, reduction of NF-κBactivation in lung cancer cells was induced by TNF-α(Batra et al, 1999; Jiang et al, 2001). Evidence has beenaccumulated that IκBα is responsible for strong negativefeedback that allows for a fast turn-off of the NF-κBresponse, whereas IκBβ and -ε function to reduce thesystem’s oscillatory potential and stabilize NF-κBresponses during longer stimulations (Hoffmann et al,2002). IκBβ appeared to block the IGF-1 signalingpathway in IκBβ-expressing lung adenocarcinoma cells,and metastatic growth of such cells in the lungs of nudemice was significantly inhibited (Jiang et al, 2001).Besides activating the AKT pathway to blockapoptosis, IGF-IR (the type 1 receptor for insulin-likegrowth factor) activates other two signaling pathways tophosphorylate BAD protein and suppress apoptosis, one ofwhich involves ras-mediated activation of the map kinasepathway. IGF-IR mediates cell survival and growth inresponse to its ligands IGF-I and IGF- II. Blockade ofIGF-I and IGF-IR demonstrated antitumor effects on lungcancer (Hochscheid et al, 2000; Sueoka et al, 2000;Pavelic et al, 2002; Lee et al, 2003). Antisenseoligodeoxynucleotides to IGF-IR and IGF- II wererecruited to suppress the proliferation of lung cancer celllines in vitro, and concomitant treatment inhibited growthup to 80% (Pavelic et al, 2002). Dominant negative IGF-IR has also shown potential for gene-based cancer therapy.Two kinds of defective IGF-IR expressed by adenoviruseseffectively blocked IGF-I-induced Akt kinase activationand significantly suppressed growth in lung cancerxenografts (Lee et al, 2003). Insulin-like growth factorbinding proteins (IGFBPs) are another promisingcandidate (Hochscheid et al, 2000; Sueoka et al, 2000).Ad-IGFBP6 reduced NSCLC cells growth in vitro and invivo in xenografts through activation apoptosis (Sueoka etal, 2000). Damage of downstream target IGF-IR-regulatedgene, such as ras, may be an alternative solution toinducing apoptosis. The antitumor effect has beendemonstrated in human lung tumor xenografts using ananti-K-ras ribozyme adenoviral vector (Zhang et al, 2000).D. New targets and approachesThe list of potential therapeutic genes promises toexpand considerably with the identification of additionalgenes related to human lung cancer.1. SurvivinA high level expression of survivin, a novelapoptosis inhibitor, has been noted in lung and breastcancers (Shen et al, 2003b). RT-PCR assay on tumorsamples from a group of 83 NSCLC patients demonstratedthat the survivin gene was expressed in samples from 71patients who showed poorer overall survival than the other12 patients (Monzo et al, 1999). Down-regulation ofsurvivin by a targeted antisense oligonucleotide (Olie et al,2000) or a TFO (Monzo et al, 1999) induced apoptosis inhuman lung cancer cells. Although further studies arerequired, this gene might provide promising clinicalbenefit in patients overexpressing survivin.2. Cyclooxygenase-2An increase in cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression,which is an important biomarker for biologicallyaggressive disease in NSCLC (Khuri et al, 2001;Brabender et al, 2002), may be associated with thedevelopment of human lung cancers and enhanced tumorinvasiveness (Hida et al, 1998). Tumor COX-2-dependentinvasion seems to be mediated by a number of factors(Dohadwala et al, 2001; 2002). Recently, Heuze-Vourc’hrevealed a novel mechanism that, due to the deficiency ofIL-10Rα on the surface of NSCLC cells and theunresponsiveness of COX-2 to IL-10 (known to potentlysuppress COX-2 in normal cells), contributes to themaintenance of elevated COX-2 and its product in the lung259
- Page 7 and 8:
Instructions to authors:Gene Therap
- Page 9:
Please submit an electronic version
- Page 12:
103-111 ResearchArticle113-133 Revi
- Page 17 and 18:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 19 and 20:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 21 and 22:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 23 and 24:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 25 and 26:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 27 and 28:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 29 and 30:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 31 and 32:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 33 and 34:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 35 and 36:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 37 and 38:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 39 and 40:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 41 and 42:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 43 and 44:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 45 and 46:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 47 and 48:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 49 and 50:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 51 and 52:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 53 and 54:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 55 and 56:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 57 and 58:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 59 and 60:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 61 and 62:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 63 and 64:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 65 and 66:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 67 and 68:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 69 and 70:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 71 and 72:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 73 and 74:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 75 and 76:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 77:
Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 80 and 81:
Epperly et al: Late injection of Mn
- Page 82 and 83:
Epperly et al: Late injection of Mn
- Page 84 and 85:
Goldberg-Cohen et al: Regulation of
- Page 86 and 87:
Goldberg-Cohen et al: Regulation of
- Page 88 and 89:
Goldberg-Cohen et al: Regulation of
- Page 90 and 91:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 92 and 93:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 94 and 95:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 96 and 97:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 98 and 99:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 100 and 101:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 102 and 103:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 104 and 105:
Gascón-Irún et al: Gene therapy a
- Page 106 and 107:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 108 and 109:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 110 and 111:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 112 and 113:
Suzuki et al: Regulation of the Sp/
- Page 114 and 115:
Li et al: MET amplification in live
- Page 116 and 117:
Li et al: MET amplification in live
- Page 118 and 119:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 120 and 121:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 122 and 123:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 124 and 125:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 126 and 127:
Chavakis et al: Leukocyte adhesion
- Page 128 and 129:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 130 and 131:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 132 and 133:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 134 and 135:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 136 and 137:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 138 and 139:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 140 and 141:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 142 and 143:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 144 and 145:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 146 and 147:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 148 and 149:
Sanlioglu et al: Adenovirus mediate
- Page 150 and 151:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 152 and 153:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 154 and 155:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 156 and 157:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 158 and 159:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 160 and 161:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 162 and 163:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 164 and 165:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 166 and 167:
George et al: Gene therapy for vasc
- Page 168 and 169:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 170 and 171:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 172 and 173:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 174 and 175:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 176 and 177:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 178 and 179:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 180 and 181:
Zhang et al: Angiogenic Gene Therap
- Page 182 and 183:
Xu et al: G-CSF receptor-mediated S
- Page 184 and 185:
Xu et al: G-CSF receptor-mediated S
- Page 186 and 187:
Xu et al: G-CSF receptor-mediated S
- Page 188 and 189:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 190 and 191:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 192 and 193:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 194 and 195:
Burek et al: Calcium induced cell d
- Page 196 and 197:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 198 and 199:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 200 and 201:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 202 and 203:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 204 and 205:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 206 and 207:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 208 and 209:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 210 and 211:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 212 and 213:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 214 and 215:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 216 and 217:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 218 and 219:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 220 and 221:
David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 222 and 223: David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 224 and 225: David et al: Current status and fut
- Page 226 and 227: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 228 and 229: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 230 and 231: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 232 and 233: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 234 and 235: Stoll et al: The role of EBV and ge
- Page 236 and 237: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 238 and 239: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 240 and 241: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 242 and 243: Maruyama et al: Kidney-targeted pla
- Page 244 and 245: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 246 and 247: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 248 and 249: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 250 and 251: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 252 and 253: Kren et al: Hepatocyte-targeted del
- Page 254 and 255: Zeng: PRL-3 as a target for cancer
- Page 256 and 257: Zeng: PRL-3 as a target for cancer
- Page 258 and 259: Zeng: PRL-3 as a target for cancer
- Page 260 and 261: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 262 and 263: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 264 and 265: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 266 and 267: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 268 and 269: Latchman: Protective effect of heat
- Page 270 and 271: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 274 and 275: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 276 and 277: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 278 and 279: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 280: Cai et al: Lung cancer gene therapy
- Page 283 and 284: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 285 and 286: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 287 and 288: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 289 and 290: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 291 and 292: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 293 and 294: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 295 and 296: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 297 and 298: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 299 and 300: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 301 and 302: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 303 and 304: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 305 and 306: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 307 and 308: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology
- Page 309: Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology