12.07.2015 Views

TDCJ-CJAD Data Manual - Texas Department of Criminal Justice

TDCJ-CJAD Data Manual - Texas Department of Criminal Justice

TDCJ-CJAD Data Manual - Texas Department of Criminal Justice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 2 <strong>of</strong> 15GENERAL QUESTIONS (CONT.)If there is no probation <strong>of</strong>fice in a given county, but a probation <strong>of</strong>ficer goes to the county ona monthly basis and probationers report directly to him/her, where should the <strong>of</strong>fender bereported under direct supervision?The <strong>of</strong>fender can be counted under direct supervision in the county where they report even ifthere is not a satellite <strong>of</strong>fice in the county.At time <strong>of</strong> intake, a probationer is assessed at minimum level for risk/needs. However, theCSO overrode the minimum assessment and classified the <strong>of</strong>fender as maximum and placedhim on ISP. They have been reporting him as Level 1 on page 1 and in ISP on page 3. Is thiscorrect reporting?Yes. It is at the discretion <strong>of</strong> the CSCD as to how they will supervise their <strong>of</strong>fenders. Continuereporting as Level 1 on p.1 and as ISP on page 3.An <strong>of</strong>fender was sentenced to <strong>TDCJ</strong>-ID for a sex <strong>of</strong>fense, did his time, and was released. Hefailed to register as a sex <strong>of</strong>fender, so now he is on probation for Violating Sex OffenderRegistration. The <strong>of</strong>ficer states that according to SCS he scores a level 4. Will reporting him asa level 4 be correct?<strong>CJAD</strong> does not require <strong>of</strong>fenders on sex <strong>of</strong>fender caseloads to be high risk (per RiskAssessment), so if this <strong>of</strong>fender scores a 4, that is how they should be reported on page 1 <strong>of</strong> theMCSCR.A CSCD will be getting a DP grant for a REGIONAL TCOOMMI funded caseload to servetheir CSCD and two other CSCDs. How should each <strong>of</strong> these CSCDs count <strong>of</strong>ficers and<strong>of</strong>fenders under direct supervision, specialized caseloads?The <strong>of</strong>fenders under direct and the specialized caseloads should be counted by each originalcounty, not by the CSCD requesting the grant (unless <strong>of</strong> course the case originated there). This isbecause the CSO is conceptualized as being an employee <strong>of</strong> the REGION rather than <strong>of</strong> anindividual CSCD, so each county can claim their own <strong>of</strong>fenders. This applies to both theMCSCR and to CSTS. However, since the money is actually going to one CSCD, that CSCDshould count the CSO as staff on the MCSCR and will be responsible for compiling andsubmitting information for the Actual Program Outputs each year.A report by mail case had a MTR filed before the term expired and is continuing to report asordered. Should the <strong>of</strong>fender be counted as an absconder or as an Indirect Other?The <strong>of</strong>fender should be counted as Indirect Other (Item I.B.6.) because they had authorization toleave the CSCD and are still complying with the court order.An <strong>of</strong>fender is active and receives a new case later on (making the <strong>of</strong>fender active for twocases). Then, the <strong>of</strong>fender is revoked to ID for the old case. How is this reported?Do not count as new placement. Under End <strong>of</strong> Month Supervision Status, count as indirect dueto incarceration (Item I.B.5.b.).- 24 ­

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!