12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fish<strong>in</strong> both Africa and Lat<strong>in</strong> America. CIATand IITA undertook a project to verifythe utility of these <strong>marker</strong>s for MAS <strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g CMD resistance by develop<strong>in</strong>gcrosses between the sources of TME3 andsusceptible varieties. A total of six families,rang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> size from 36–840 genotypes, anda total of 2 490 genotypes were used. Thecrosses were genotyped with two <strong>marker</strong>sand also evaluated for CMD resistance<strong>in</strong> a high CMD pressure area <strong>in</strong> Nigeria.Results of the <strong>marker</strong> analysis and phenotypicevaluation of CMD resistance <strong>in</strong>the field revealed that the <strong>marker</strong>s RME1and NS158 SSR were excellent predictiontools for CMD resistance <strong>in</strong> some crosses(a prediction accuracy of 70–80 percent). Ina few families, however, the <strong>marker</strong>s werenot polymorphic between the resistant andsusceptible parent and, therefore, were notuseful. This highlights the need to developmany <strong>marker</strong>s around a gene of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>a MAS programme and then to use those<strong>marker</strong>s to evaluate the parents and identifythe best <strong>marker</strong>s for the different crosscomb<strong>in</strong>ations.Eighteen progenies from TME3 carry<strong>in</strong>gthe CMD2 <strong>marker</strong> were established fromembryo axes and imported to CIAT fromIITA. They were crossed extensively to eliteparents. Seeds harvested from the crosseswere germ<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> vitro from embryo axesaccord<strong>in</strong>g to standard protocols for cassava(Fregene et al., 1997, CIAT, 2002) to allowshar<strong>in</strong>g the CMD resistant genotypes withcollaborators <strong>in</strong> Africa and India. Eachplantlet was multiplied after three to fourweeks of growth to obta<strong>in</strong> three to fiveplants. After another four weeks, leaves of allPhytosanitary conditions for the exchangeof cassava germplasm between Africa and Asiaare very str<strong>in</strong>gent, but appropriately <strong>in</strong>dexed <strong>in</strong>vitro cultures of embryo axes are permitted forexperimental purposes.plants were removed for molecular analysisand the plants multiplied aga<strong>in</strong> to obta<strong>in</strong>10–20 plantlets. DNA isolation was by arapid m<strong>in</strong>i preparation method developedfor rice (Nobuyuki et al., 2000). The DNAobta<strong>in</strong>ed is sufficient for 100 reactions andcan be held <strong>in</strong> the Costar plates for twomonths at –20 o C without any degradation.PCR amplification, polyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis (PAGE) or agarose gelanalysis of SSR <strong>marker</strong>s NS158 and RME1were as described by Mba et al. (2001). Theversatility of spreadsheets makes them theappropriate software to handle the diverse<strong>in</strong>formation generated by MAS. Gel imagesfrom the <strong>marker</strong> analysis were entereddirectly <strong>in</strong>to a spreadsheet that conta<strong>in</strong>s<strong>in</strong>formation on the parents, tissue cultureand greenhouse records, and subsequentphenotypic evaluation of the progenies.After molecular analysis, genotypes thatcarry the <strong>marker</strong> allele associated withCMD2 were further multiplied to obta<strong>in</strong>at least 30 plants. Ten plants were sent tothe greenhouse for harden<strong>in</strong>g and latertransferred to the breed<strong>in</strong>g programme forevaluation. Five plants were kept <strong>in</strong> vitro,while 15 plants were shipped to partners <strong>in</strong>India and Africa as shown <strong>in</strong> the flow chartfor MAS (Figure 4).To date, more than 50 000 progeny havebeen evaluated with CMD l<strong>in</strong>ked <strong>marker</strong>sand resistant l<strong>in</strong>es shared with nationalprogrammes <strong>in</strong> India or Africa, and also<strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the breed<strong>in</strong>g scheme atCIAT. The cost of a s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>marker</strong> datapo<strong>in</strong>t is US$0.30 and 32 000 samples can beprocessed <strong>in</strong> a year.MAS for CMD resistance at a NARSAlthough evaluation for CMD resistance<strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa is relatively easy andmost areas have sufficient disease pressureto permit moderate to high heritability

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!