marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 17 – Marker-assisted selection in fish and shellfish breeding schemes 361Sundin, K., Brown, K.H., Drew, R.E., Nichols, K.M., Wheeler, P.A. & Thorgaard, G.H. 2005.Genetic analysis of a development rate QTL in backcrosses of clonal rainbow trout, Oncorhynchusmykiss. Aquaculture 247: 75–83.Tanck, M.W.T., Palstra, A.P., van de Weerd, M., Leffering, C.P., van der Poel, J.J., Bovenhuis, H.& Komen, J. 2001. Segregation of microsatellite alleles and residual heterozygosity at single loci inhomozygous androgenetic common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Genome 44: 743–751.Tao, W.J. & Boulding, E.G. 2003. Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms in candidategenes and growth rate in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). Hered. 91: 60–69.Taris, N., Baron, S. & Sharbel, T.F. 2005. A combined microsatellite multiplexing and boiling DNAextraction method for high-throughput parentage analyses in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas).Aquaculture Res. 36: 516–518.Thomas, S. C., Pemberton, J.M. & Hill, W.G. 2000. Estimating variance components in natural populationsusing inferred relationships. Hered. 84: 427–436.Thomas, S.C. & Hill, W.G. 2000. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sib-ships reconstructedfrom marker data. Genet. 155: 1961–1972.Thorgaard, G.H. & Allen S.K. 1987. Chromosome manipulation and markers in fishery management.In N. Ryman & F.M. Utter, eds. Population genetics and fishery management, pp. 319–331.Seattle, WA, USA, University of Washington Press.Toro, M. & Mäki-Tanila, A. 1999. Establishing a conservation scheme. In J.K. Oldenbroek, ed. Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resources, pp.75–90. Lelystad, Netherlands,DLO Institute of Animal Health.Toro, M., Barragán, C. & Óvilo, C. 2002. Estimation of coancestry in Iberian pigs using molecularmarkers. Conserv. Genet. 3: 309–320.Toro, J.E., Sanhueza, M.A., Winter, J.E., Aguila, P. & Vergara, A.M. 1995 Selection response andheritability estimates for growth in the Chilean oyster Ostrea chilensis (Philippi, 1845). J. ShellfishRes. 14: 87–92.Vasemägi A., Nilsson, J. & Primmer, C.R. 2005. Expressed sequence tag (EST)-linked microsatellitesas a source of gene associated polymorphisms for detecting signatures of divergent selection inAtlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol. Biol. & Evol. 22: 1067–1076.Villanueva, B.,Verspoor, E. & Visscher, P.M. 2002. Parental assignment in fish using microsatellitegenetic markers with finite numbers of parents and offspring. Anim. Genet. 33: 33–41.Villanueva, B., Pong-Wong, R. & Woolliams, J.A. 2002. Marker assisted selection with optimisedcontributions of the candidates to selection. Genet. Select. & Evol. 34: 679–703.Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Van De Lee, T., Hornes, M., Friters, A., Pot, J.,Paleman, J., Kuiper, M. & Zabeau, M. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting.Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 4407–4414Waldbieser, G.C., Bosworth, B.G., Nonneman, D.J. & Wolters, W.R. 2001. A microsatellite-basedgenetic linkage map for channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Genet. 158: 727–734.Walsh, B. & Henderson, D.J. 2004. Microarrays and beyond: What potential do current and futuregenomics tools have for breeders? Anim. Sci. 82: E292–E299.Wang, J. 2004. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genet. 166: 1963–1979.Wang, L., Song, L., Chang, Y. & Xu, W. 2005. A preliminary genetic map of Zhikong scallop(Chlamys farreri, Jones et Preston 1904). Aquaculture Res. 36: 643–653.
362Marker-assisted selection – Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fishWard, R D., English, L. & McGoldrick, J. 2000. Genetic improvement of the Pacific oyster,Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg) in Australia. Aquaculture Res. 31: 35–44.Withler, R. & Beacham, T. 1984. Genetic consequences of the simultaneous or sequential addition ofsemen from multiple males during hatchery spawning of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).Aquaculture 126: 11–20.Wright, J.M. & Bentzen, P. 1994. Microsatellites – genetic markers for the future. Rev. Fish Biol. &Fisheries 4: 384–388.Wu, W.-R., Li, W.-M., Tang, D.-Z., Lu, H.-R. & Worland, A.J. 1999. Time-related mapping of quantitativetrait loci underlying tiller number in rice. Genet. 151: 297–303.Xu, S. & Atchley, W. 1995. A random model approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci.Genet. 141: 1189–1197.Xu, S. & Gessler, D. 1998. Multipoint genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci using a variablenumber of sibs per family. Genet. Res. 71: 73–83.Young, W.P., Wheeler, P.A., Fields, R.D. & Thorgaard, G.H. 1996. DNA fingerprinting confirmsisogenicity of androgenetically-derived rainbow trout lines. J. Hered. 87: 77–81.Young, W.P., Wheeler, P.A., Coryell, V.H., Keim, P. & Thorgaard, G.H. 1998 A detailed linkage mapof rainbow trout produced using doubled haploids. Genet. 148: 839–850.Yue, G.H., Ho., M.Y. & Orban, L. 2004. Microsatellites within genes and ESTs of common carp andtheir applicability in silver crucian carp. Aquaculture 234: 85–98.Zhang, W. & Smith, C. 1992. Computer simulation of marker assisted selection utilizing linkage disequilibrium.Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 813–820.Zimmerman, A.M., Wheeler, P.A., Ristow, S.S. & Thorgaard, G.H. 2005. Composite interval mappingreveals three QTL associated with pyloric caeca number in rainbow trout. Aquaculture 247:85–95.
Page 4 and 5:
iiiContentsAcknowledgementsForeword
Page 6 and 7:
Section v - marker-assisted selecti
Page 8 and 9:
viiForewordSince almost the beginni
Page 10 and 11:
ixAbbreviations and acronymsAATFAB-
Page 12 and 13:
xiFIVIMSFNPFSCFSILGABIGASGCAGCPGDPG
Page 14 and 15:
xiiiOBMOECDOIEOPVPAGEPBRsPCRPGRFAPI
Page 16 and 17:
xvContributorsAmalia BaroneProfesso
Page 18 and 19:
xviiElcio Perpétuo GuimarãesSenio
Page 20:
xixAndrea SonninoSenior Agricultura
Page 24 and 25:
Chapter 1Marker-assisted selection
Page 26 and 27:
Chapter 1 - An overview of the issu
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34:
Page 37 and 38:
16Marker-assisted selection - Curre
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 50 and 51:
Chapter 3Molecular markers for use
Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 3 - Molecular markers for u
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 88 and 89:
Chapter 6Targeted introgression of
Page 90 and 91:
Chapter 6 - Targeted introgression
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 7 - Marker-assisted selecti
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136:
Page 139 and 140:
118Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 188 and 189:
Chapter 10Strategies, limitations a
Page 190 and 191:
Chapter 10 - Strategies, limitation
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Chapter 11 - Marker-assisted select
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 328:
Section VMarker-assisted selectioni
Page 331 and 332: 310Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 381: 360Marker-assisted selection - Curr
Page 386 and 387: Chapter 18Marker-assisted selection
Page 388 and 389: Chapter 18 - Marker-assisted select
Page 402 and 403: Chapter 19Technical, economic and p
Page 404 and 405: Chapter 19 - Technical, economic an
Page 426 and 427: Chapter 20Impacts of intellectual p
Page 428 and 429: Chapter 20 - Impacts of intellectua
Page 430 and 431: Chapter 20 - Impacts of intellectua
Page 432 and 433:
Chapter 20 - Impacts of intellectua
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 442 and 443:
Page 444 and 445:
Page 446:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 494:
This book provides a comprehensive
show all

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?