12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

424Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fishEdwards, K., Johnstone, C. & Thompson, C. 1991. A simple and rapid method for the preparationof plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 19(6): 1349.Epp, T.D. 2004. Four-wheel<strong>in</strong>g through the soybean fields of <strong>in</strong>tellectual property law: A practitioner’sperspective. Washburn Law J. 43: 669–679.Fromer, J.C. 2007. Invigorat<strong>in</strong>g the disclosure function of the patent system. NYU Law School,Public Law Research Paper Series, 2 March 2007 (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=967560) .Fulton, M. & Giannakas, K. 2001. Agricultural biotechnology and <strong>in</strong>dustry structure. AgBioForum,4(2): 137–151.Gallagher, G.J. 2002. Recent development: the Federal circuit and claim construction: resolv<strong>in</strong>g theconflict between the claims and the written description. North Carol<strong>in</strong>a J. Law & Technol. 4(1):121–142.Hore, E. 2004. Patently absurd: evergreen<strong>in</strong>g of pharmaceutical patent protection under the PatentedMedic<strong>in</strong>es (Notice of Compliance) Regulations of Canada’s Patent Act. Canadian GenericPharmaceut. Assocn. (available at www.canadiangenerics.ca/en/issues/patently_absurd_04.pdf).Kattan, J. 2002. Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g patent <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement and validity <strong>in</strong> antitrust analysis (available atwww.ftc.gov/opp/<strong>in</strong>tellect/020514kattan.pdf#search=%22%22merger%22%2B%22<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement%22%22).Kellison, R., McCord, S. & Gartland, K.M.A. 2004. Forest biotechnology <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America. Proc.Forestry Biotech. Workshop, 3–5 March 2004, Concepcíon, Chile (available at www.forestbiotech.org/pdffiles/ChlePDFf<strong>in</strong>al31Jan2005.pdf).Kershen, D.L. 2004. Of stray<strong>in</strong>g crops and patent rights. Washburn Law J. 43: 575–610.Lee, S., A’Hara, S. & Cottrell, J. 2005. The use of DNA technology to advance the Sitka sprucebreed<strong>in</strong>g programme. Forestry Res. Report (available at www.forestresearch.gov.uk/pdf/FR_report_2005-6_dnatech.pdf).Murchie, B.J., Renaud, A.B., Horne, L.E.T. & Hussey, D.T. 2006. Canada’s balanc<strong>in</strong>g act. (availableat www.lexpert.ca/500/lb.php?id=120).O’Connor, S.M. 2006. The use of MTAs to control commercialization of stem cell diagnostics andtherapeutics. Berkeley Technology Law J. (available at : http://ssrn.com/abstract=921170).Röder, M.S., Korzun, V., Wendehake, K., Plaschke, J., Tixier, M.H., Leroy, P. & Ganal, M.W. 1998.A microsatellite map of <strong>wheat</strong>. Genetics. 149(4): 2007–2023.Rothschild, M.F., Plastow, G.S. & Newman, S. 2004. Patent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> animal breed<strong>in</strong>g and genetics. InA. Rosati, A. Tewolde & C. Mosconi, eds. WAAP Book of the Year 2003: a review on developmentsand research <strong>in</strong> livestock systems, pp. 269–278. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen, Netherlands, Academic Publishers(also available at www.psas-web.net/documents/Info/3.5%20Rothschild.pdf).Rothschild, M.F., Kim, K.S. & Anderson, L.L. 2006. Ghrel<strong>in</strong> alleles and use of the same for geneticallytyp<strong>in</strong>g animals. US Patent Number 7,074,562.Saghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgensen, R.A. & Allard, R.W. 1984. Ribosomal DNAspacer-length polymorphisms <strong>in</strong> barley: Mendelian <strong>in</strong>heritance, chromosomal location, and populationdynamics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 81: 8014–8018.Schaeffer, L.R. 2002. Dairy cattle test day models: a case study. In M. Rothschild & S. Newman, eds.,Intellectual property rights <strong>in</strong> animal breed<strong>in</strong>g and genetics. Wall<strong>in</strong>gford, UK, CABI.Smyth, S. 2006. Implication and potential impacts from the expiry of patents on herbicide tolerantcanola varieties. Saskatchewan Canola Development Commission (available at www.saskcanola.com/pdfs/scdc-patent-report.pdf).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!