12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 13 – Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> <strong>in</strong> sheep and goats 231IntroductionThe benefits of <strong>marker</strong>-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong>(MAS) to sheep and goat breed<strong>in</strong>gprogrammes depend on a number ofconditions that are relevant for mostbreed<strong>in</strong>g programmes across species. Theseconditions <strong>in</strong>clude the existence of a genotypetest predict<strong>in</strong>g phenotypic differences,the economic value of these differencesand the value of the genotypic <strong>in</strong>formationwith<strong>in</strong> the breed<strong>in</strong>g programme. The valueof genetic <strong>in</strong>formation will depend heavilyon the socio-economic context of thebreed<strong>in</strong>g programme and the productionsystem. In a technical sense, the value ofthis <strong>in</strong>formation is basically driven by the<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>selection</strong> accuracy result<strong>in</strong>g fromknowledge of genotypes, which <strong>in</strong> turn willdiffer between animals from different ageclasses. In particular, the relative <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><strong>selection</strong> accuracy of the youngest <strong>selection</strong>candidates will be critical to the valueof MAS. However, technical argumentsabout <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>selection</strong> accuracy are oflittle value if these <strong>selection</strong> criteria arepoorly developed or accepted with<strong>in</strong> theproduction system.The application of new technologies suchas MAS <strong>in</strong> animal breed<strong>in</strong>g programmestherefore depends not only on a number oftechnical aspects associated with <strong>in</strong>creasedrates of genetic improvement, but also onthe commercial structures of the <strong>in</strong>dustry.For example, the uptake of MAS <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>gprogrammes depends on the will<strong>in</strong>gness ofbreeders to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> genotypic <strong>in</strong>formation,and their ability to turn this <strong>in</strong>toknowledge that helps them improve theircommercial breed<strong>in</strong>g activities. A basicunderstand<strong>in</strong>g of breed<strong>in</strong>g programmecharacteristics, the possible role of genetic<strong>in</strong>formation with<strong>in</strong> these programmes, andthe commercial relationships among thedifferent players are needed to assess thevalue and predict the application of MAS<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes. These commercialrelationships are dist<strong>in</strong>ctly different<strong>in</strong> sheep and goat breed<strong>in</strong>g programmesfrom those <strong>in</strong> the more <strong>in</strong>tensive animal<strong>in</strong>dustries, and the application of MAS willtherefore be different. For example, 96 percentof the world goat population is keptby smallholders <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries,and genetic improvement programmes arerare (Olivier et al., 2005).The purpose of this chapter is to describethe use of MAS <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programmesfor sheep and goats and the likely rate ofuptake of this technology <strong>in</strong> these species. Itbeg<strong>in</strong>s by characteriz<strong>in</strong>g such programmesand describ<strong>in</strong>g and compar<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g programmes.MAS is most useful for traits thatcannot be improved easily by phenotypic<strong>selection</strong>, either because they are difficultto measure on young animals (before sexualreproduction), or because of low heritability.Therefore, breed<strong>in</strong>g objectives arediscussed <strong>in</strong> general terms and the traits thatare particularly suitable for MAS are identified.Based on some general well-knownadvantages of MAS, its possible role with<strong>in</strong>breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes can be predicted andexamples of these are provided. Examplesof marked genes are then described andan overview given of the status of “genediscovery” and gene mapp<strong>in</strong>g projects <strong>in</strong>sheep and goats. The chapter concludesby describ<strong>in</strong>g cases of us<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>formation<strong>in</strong> actual breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes. Somegene tests are based on actual functionalmutations, many of which do not affectquantitative traits that are generally targeted<strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes. Although,the term “MAS” should be replaced <strong>in</strong>some cases by “genotype <strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong>”(GAS), the term MAS is used looselyto refer to all <strong>selection</strong> based on genotypic<strong>in</strong>formation. It will become clear that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!