12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

330Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fishSummaryThe ma<strong>in</strong> goals of breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes for fish and shellfish are to <strong>in</strong>crease the profitabilityand susta<strong>in</strong>ability of aquaculture. Traditionally, these have been carried outsuccessfully us<strong>in</strong>g pedigree <strong>in</strong>formation by select<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals based on breed<strong>in</strong>g valuespredicted for traits measured on candidates us<strong>in</strong>g an “animal model”. This methodologyassumes that phenotypes are expla<strong>in</strong>ed by a large number of genes with small effectsand random environmental deviations. However, <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>in</strong>dividual genes withmedium or large effects cannot be used <strong>in</strong> this manner. In selective breed<strong>in</strong>g programmesus<strong>in</strong>g pedigree <strong>in</strong>formation, molecular <strong>marker</strong>s have been used primarily for parentageassignment when tagg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual fish is difficult and to avoid caus<strong>in</strong>g common environmentaleffects from rear<strong>in</strong>g families <strong>in</strong> separate tanks. The use of these techniques <strong>in</strong> suchconventional breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes is discussed <strong>in</strong> detail.Exploit<strong>in</strong>g the great biological diversity of many fish and shellfish species, differentexperimental designs may use either chromosomal manipulations or large family sizesto <strong>in</strong>crease the likelihood of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the loci affect<strong>in</strong>g quantitative traits, the so-calledQTL, by screen<strong>in</strong>g the segregation of molecular <strong>marker</strong>s. Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on identifiedloci <strong>in</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g schemes <strong>in</strong> aquaculture is expected to be cost-effective compared withtraditional breed<strong>in</strong>g methods only when the accuracy of predict<strong>in</strong>g breed<strong>in</strong>g values israther low, e.g. for traits with low heritability such as disease resistance or carcass quality.One of the problems fac<strong>in</strong>g aquaculture is that some of the resources required to locateQTL accurately, such as dense l<strong>in</strong>kage maps, are not yet available for the many species.Recently, however, <strong>in</strong>formation from expressed sequence tag (EST) databases has beenused for develop<strong>in</strong>g molecular <strong>marker</strong>s such as microsatellites and s<strong>in</strong>gle nucleotidepolymorphisms (SNPs). Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> (MAS) or genome-wide <strong>marker</strong>-<strong>assisted</strong><strong>selection</strong> (G-MAS) us<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>kage disequilibrium with<strong>in</strong> families or across populations arenot widely used <strong>in</strong> aquaculture, but their application <strong>in</strong> actual breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes isexpected to be a fertile area of research. This chapter describes how genomic tools can beused jo<strong>in</strong>tly with pedigree-based breed<strong>in</strong>g strategies and the potential and real value ofmolecular <strong>marker</strong>s <strong>in</strong> fish and shellfish breed<strong>in</strong>g schemes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!