12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 12 – Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> <strong>in</strong> dairy cattle 211Table 1Summary of dairy cattle genome scansExperimentaldesignBreed Country Traits analysed ReferencesGranddaughter Ayrshire F<strong>in</strong>land Milk production 1 Vilkki et al., 1997; de Kon<strong>in</strong>g et al.,2001; Viitala et al., 2003SCS 2 , mastitis, other treatments Schulman et al., 2004Jersey New Zealand Conformation Spelman, Garrick and vanArendonk, 1999Holste<strong>in</strong> Canadian Milk production Plante et al., 2001France Milk production Boichard et al., 2003Germany Milk production Thomsen et al., 2001Functional Kuhn et al., 2003Conformation, temperament, Hiendleder et al., 2003milk<strong>in</strong>g speedNetherlands conformation, SCS, fertility, Schrooten et al., 2000calv<strong>in</strong>g, milk<strong>in</strong>g speed,gestation, birth weight,temperamentNew Zealand Conformation Spelman, Garrick and vanArendonk, 1999USA Milk production Ashwell et al., 1998b; Ashwell andTassell 1999; Ashwell et al., 1997,2004; Ashwell, Van Tassell andSonstegard, 2001;Georges et al.,1995; Heyen et al., 1999; Zhang etal., 1998SCS Ashwell et al., 1996, 1997, 1998b;Ashwell and Van Tassell, 1999;Heyen et al., 1999Herdlife Heyen et al., 1999Conformation Ashwell et al., 1998a, 1998b;Ashwell and Van Tassell, 1999Fertility Ashwell et al., 2004Montbeliarde France Milk production Boichard et al., 2003Normande France Milk production Boichard et al., 2003Norwegian Norway Milk production Olsen et al., 2002SCS, mastitis Klungland et al., 2001Swedish Sweden SCS, mastitis, other diseases Holmberg and Andersson-Eklund,2004Daughter Holste<strong>in</strong> Israel Milk production, SCS, fertility, Ron et al., 2004herdlife% prote<strong>in</strong> Mosig et al., 20011Milk, fat, and prote<strong>in</strong> production, and fat and prote<strong>in</strong> concentration.2Somatic cell concentrationenvironmental factors. Cows are scatteredover many different herds with differentmanagement levels, and distribution of siresacross herds is not random or orthogonal.Furthermore, cows generally producemultiple lactations that are correlated. Inorder to account for the limited heritability,and co-variances among relatives, geneticeffects are generally assumed to berandom, while most environmental effectsare assumed to be fixed. Thus, geneticevaluation is performed by the mixedmodel us<strong>in</strong>g best l<strong>in</strong>ear unbiased prediction(BLUP) methodology (Henderson, 1984).Beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the late 1980s, the modelof choice for genetic evaluation for milkproduction traits was the <strong>in</strong>dividual animalmodel, <strong>in</strong> which a genetic effect is computed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!