12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

394Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fish500 000Figure 2Stylized economic model of a plant breed<strong>in</strong>g programmeVarietal adoption stage400 000Net annual benefits (US$)300 000200 000100 000Research<strong>in</strong>vestmentstageVarietalreleasestage0-100 0001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20Time (years)by develop<strong>in</strong>g a simple model of a plantbreed<strong>in</strong>g programme and us<strong>in</strong>g it to comparethe returns with alternative <strong>in</strong>bredl<strong>in</strong>e conversion schemes based on conventional<strong>selection</strong> and MAS. Two measures ofproject worth were used: the net presentvalue (NPV) of the discounted streams ofcosts and benefits, and the <strong>in</strong>ternal rate ofreturn (IRR) to the <strong>in</strong>vestment.Figure 2 depicts the stylized “variety lifecycle” assumed by the model. The stream ofcosts and benefits associated with the development,release and adoption by farmers ofan improved variety can be divided <strong>in</strong>tothree stages: a research stage dur<strong>in</strong>g whichthe variety is developed; a release stagedur<strong>in</strong>g which the variety is evaluated andregistered for release, and commercial seedis produced; and an adoption stage dur<strong>in</strong>gwhich the variety is taken up and grownby farmers. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the first two stages,net benefits are negative, because costsare <strong>in</strong>curred without any benefits be<strong>in</strong>grealized. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the third stage, net benefitsturn positive as the variety is takenup and grown by farmers; they cont<strong>in</strong>ueto <strong>in</strong>crease until the peak adoption level isachieved and then decl<strong>in</strong>e when the varietyis replaced by newer varieties.The model was used to estimate theNPV and IRR of conventional and <strong>marker</strong><strong>assisted</strong><strong>in</strong>bred l<strong>in</strong>e conversion schemes.Research cost data were taken from theCIMMYT case study. Plausible values wereused for key parameters relat<strong>in</strong>g to the varietalrelease and adoption stages (for details,see Morris et al., 2003). Figure 3 shows thestreams of annual net benefits generated byeach of the two breed<strong>in</strong>g schemes. Annualnet benefits are calculated as follows:NB t = (GB t - VR t - RC t )where:NB = net benefitsGB = gross benefits (calculated as areaplanted to the variety x <strong>in</strong>crementalbenefits associated with adoption)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!