12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 12 – Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> <strong>in</strong> dairy cattle 207Figure 3The granddaughter designMAmaMA??ma??The grandsire is assumed to be heterozygous for a QTL and a l<strong>in</strong>ked genetic <strong>marker</strong>. As <strong>in</strong> Figure 2, only a s<strong>in</strong>gle familyis shown. The two alleles of the <strong>marker</strong> locus are denote “M” and “m”, and the two alleles of the QTL are denoted “A”and “a”. Alleles of maternal orig<strong>in</strong> are denoted by question marks. Genotypes are not listed for the granddaughtersbecause they were not genotyped.tive frequencies. To answer this question,Weller et al. (2002) proposed the “modifiedgranddaughter design” presented <strong>in</strong>Figure 4. Assume that a segregat<strong>in</strong>g QTLfor a trait of <strong>in</strong>terest has been detectedand mapped to a short chromosomalsegment us<strong>in</strong>g either a daughter or a granddaughterdesign. Consider the maternalgranddaughters of a grandsire with a significantcontrast between his two paternalalleles. This grandsire will be denoted the“heterozygous grandsire”. Each maternalgranddaughter will receive one allele fromher sire, who is assumed to be unrelated tothe heterozygous grandsire, and one allelefrom her dam, who is a daughter of theheterozygous grandsire. Of these granddaughters,one-quarter should receive thegrandpaternal QTL allele with the positiveeffect, one-quarter should receive the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!