12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6 – Targeted <strong>in</strong>trogression of cotton fibre quality quantitative trait loci us<strong>in</strong>g molecular <strong>marker</strong>s 71planted <strong>in</strong> two replications, each plot (onerow) measur<strong>in</strong>g 5 m. The next BC 3 andBC 4 generations were grown under field(411 BC 3 <strong>in</strong> 2002) or greenhouse (450 BC 4<strong>in</strong> 2003) conditions <strong>in</strong> Montpellier. Everyplant <strong>in</strong> each BC 1-4 generation was used forDNA extraction from young fresh leavesus<strong>in</strong>g different methods described elsewhere(Lacape et al., 2003; Nguyen et al.,2004). In each BC 3 and BC 4 generation, anearly genotyp<strong>in</strong>g was conducted (beforeflower<strong>in</strong>g of BC 3 plants and at the seedl<strong>in</strong>gstage for BC 4 plants), to reduce the numberof plants to be manipulated and raised toflower<strong>in</strong>g for self<strong>in</strong>g and backcross<strong>in</strong>g.From each generation (75 BC 1 , 200 BC 2 ,400 BC 2 S 1 , 43 selected BC 3 and 37 selectedBC 4 ), the cotton seed harvest was g<strong>in</strong>ned(separation of the fibre from the seed) on alaboratory roller g<strong>in</strong> and the fibre was sampledfor analyses at the Fibre TechnologyLaboratory of the French AgriculturalResearch Centre for International Development(CIRAD).Fibre analysesAll fibre quality measurements (11 traits)were conducted at CIRAD, Montpellier,on a high volume <strong>in</strong>strument l<strong>in</strong>e (ZellwegerUster 900, Uster Technologies, Switzerland).These <strong>in</strong>cluded length, uniformity, strength,elongation and colour. A FMT3 maturimeter(Shirley Dev Ltd., UK) was used to determ<strong>in</strong>emicronaire value, maturity and f<strong>in</strong>eness.Molecular analysesThe different types of <strong>marker</strong>s display<strong>in</strong>gpolymorphism between G. hirsutum andG. barbadense <strong>in</strong>cluded restriction fragmentlength polymorphisms (RFLPs) (used only<strong>in</strong> the BC 1 generation), simple sequencerepeats (SSRs) and amplified fragment lengthpolymorphisms (AFLPs). Details of the<strong>marker</strong>s and protocols used are provided<strong>in</strong> Lacape et al. (2003) and Nguyen et al.(2004). The AFLP <strong>marker</strong>s were all derivedfrom comb<strong>in</strong>ations of EcoRI/MseI primerpairs (64 pairs <strong>in</strong> the BC 1 , 45 <strong>in</strong> the BC 2 and30 <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 and BC 4 generations). Thecotton microsatellites were derived essentiallyfrom two public libraries, BrookhavenNational Laboratory (BNL) and CIRAD(CIR). In the BC 1 generation, the microsatellitesused <strong>in</strong>cluded 188 polymorphic BNL<strong>marker</strong>s out of the 216 available (Lacapeet al., 2003) and 204 CIR <strong>marker</strong>s out of392 developed (Nguyen et al., 2004). Fromthe results of the comb<strong>in</strong>ed QTL analysesof the BC 1 /BC 2 /BC 2 S 1 generations (Lacapeet al., 2005), QTL-rich regions were identifiedon “carrier” chromosomes, and SSRloci present with<strong>in</strong> or <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity ofthese regions were assembled for constitut<strong>in</strong>ggroups of three SSRs (one group perregion) to be tested as multiplexes, tak<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>to account both anneal<strong>in</strong>g temperatureand compatibility of sizes of amplified fragments.A subset of 60 SSR (20 region-specifictriplexes) was used for early genotyp<strong>in</strong>g ofall 411 BC 3 and 450 BC 4 plants (see examples<strong>in</strong> Figure 2). The <strong>in</strong>dividual plants selectedfrom BC 3 and BC 4 (43 and 37 plants respectively)were further analysed us<strong>in</strong>g knownAFLPs to provide broad genome coverage.In the context of our <strong>marker</strong>-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>in</strong>trogressionprogramme, the SSR <strong>marker</strong>starget the QTL-rich regions, i.e. those lociof the “foreground genome” expected tohave been <strong>in</strong>trogressed, while the AFLP<strong>marker</strong>s essentially serve to cover the rest ofthe genome, i.e. the “background genome”,aimed at return<strong>in</strong>g to the recipient genomecomposition.Construction of genetic mapThe BC 1 (75 <strong>in</strong>dividuals) and BC 2 (200<strong>in</strong>dividuals) maps were constructed separatelyus<strong>in</strong>g the MapMaker 3.0 software

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!