12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6 – Targeted <strong>in</strong>trogression of cotton fibre quality quantitative trait loci us<strong>in</strong>g molecular <strong>marker</strong>s 73Table 1Range of parental (G. hirsutum [Gh] and G. barbadense [Gb]) values over the five sets of dataGh Gb BC 1N=75BC 2N=200BC 2S 1N=200BC 3N=43BC 4N=37Length (mm)* 27.5–31.8 39.2–43.7 33.8(27.8–38.2)Length uniformity 81.3–85.5 83.9–87.1 85.0(82.0–88.2)Strength (g/tex) 26.5–32.5 41.4–46.7 35.7(29.7–41.6)Elongation 5.1–6.4 5.5–6.0 6.3(5.7–7.4)F<strong>in</strong>eness (mtex)** 207–243 178–191 218(177–308)Colour reflectance 71.2–77.7 74.6–75.6 74.3(65.9–81.1)28.6(22.9–35.3)81.3(73.3–86.7)28.3(17.8–43.7)5.5(3.9–7.6)224(165–379)72.2(56.8–81.3)30.7(26.9–36.1)83.3(80.6–85.1)29.0(23.7–34.5)6.3(5.4–7.4)225(176–285)74.1(69.8–77.5)30.0(25.0–33.9)81.9(77.6–86.4)24.5(16.8–32.8)5.7(4.5–7.0)128***(117–148)71.5(64.7–76.6)31.7(28.1–37.1)86.1(82.5–89.5)33.8(29.7–39.1)6.3(4.9–7.4)243(192–283)75.1(67.1–82.0)* Length is upper half mean length (UHML), ** standard f<strong>in</strong>eness, *** low fibre f<strong>in</strong>eness values <strong>in</strong> BC 3 generation because ofpoor maturitiesNote: Mean values and range (<strong>in</strong> brackets) observed <strong>in</strong> each BC 1–4 generation (number of plants, N, <strong>in</strong>dicated) of fibretechnological parameters.ness <strong>in</strong>dex, for example, were positivelyconsidered.Details of the plant material used andthe types of analyses undertaken dur<strong>in</strong>gthe different steps of the MAS process aregiven <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.ResultsPhenotypic variationThe two parents were characterized by theircontrast<strong>in</strong>g fibre properties (Table 1) withsignificant advantages for the G. barbadenseparent <strong>in</strong> terms of length (+9.7 mm onaverage over all data sets), strength (+15.9 g/tex) and f<strong>in</strong>eness (-38 mtex). By contrast,the G. hirsutum parent displayed better yellowness<strong>in</strong>dex/colour reflectance. For eachBC population, it was observed that thedata fitted normal distributions, that transgressivesegregants were regularly <strong>in</strong> thelower range of phenotypic values and that,although progeny values rarely reachedthose of G. barbadense, high phenotypicvalues were observed, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> themost advanced BC 4 generation (Table 1).Genetic mapp<strong>in</strong>gThe first step <strong>in</strong> the programme <strong>in</strong>volvedthe construction of two genetic maps oftetraploid cotton by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g RFLP, SSRand AFLP <strong>marker</strong>s generated separatelyfrom the first two backcross generations(BC 1 and BC 2 ). The <strong>in</strong>itial BC 1 map compris<strong>in</strong>g888 loci grouped <strong>in</strong> 37 l<strong>in</strong>kagegroups and spann<strong>in</strong>g 4 400 cM (Lacape etal., 2003), benefited from the developmentand <strong>in</strong>tegration of new additional microsatellite<strong>marker</strong>s (Nguyen et al., 2004). Thisupdated saturated BC1 map spans 5 500 cMand comprises a total of 1 160 loci orderedalong 26 chromosomes or l<strong>in</strong>kage groups(Nguyen et al., 2004). On the other hand,the BC 2 map constructed us<strong>in</strong>g AFLP andSSR <strong>marker</strong>s had 514 loci <strong>in</strong> total. The twomaps agreed perfectly for loci order. Theyhad 373 loci <strong>in</strong> common (between sevenand 26 per chromosome throughout the 26chromosomes), thus allow<strong>in</strong>g their merger<strong>in</strong>to a comb<strong>in</strong>ed consensus map. The consensusframework map comprises 1 306loci and spans 5 597 cM, with an average<strong>marker</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval of 4.3 cM.QTL detectionThe QTL analyses, conducted throughcomposite <strong>in</strong>terval mapp<strong>in</strong>g, used twomolecular data sets (BC 1 and BC 2 ) andthree sets of fibre measurements (per plant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!