12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fishTable 4Percentage of <strong>in</strong>trogressed loci (I%), at the heterozygous state, of 37 BC 4 plants that were derivedfrom four different BC 1 plants (Nos. 3, 11, 16, and 27)PlantnumberBC 1 BC 2 BC 3 BC 4Numberof lociI% NumberofplantsNumberof lociI% Number Numberof plants of lociI% NumberofplantsNumberof lociI%globalI%target/non-targetNo. 3 646 55 1 479 14 1 467 8 9 456 5 10/4No. 11 654 64 1 446 28 1 403 13 1 408 10 29/6No. 16 681 67 2 464 31 3 420 15 21 428 9 25/6No. 27 668 63 1 471 26 1 433 15 6 439 10 25/6Mean 62 26 14 8 21/5Note: The number of plants and of loci analysed at each generation are given. At the BC 4 generation, the percentage of<strong>in</strong>trogression is also differentiated between target and non-target (as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Table 3) regions.Moderate deviations were observed fromtheoretical transmission values (62, 26, 14and 8 percent compared with 50, 25, 12.5and 6.25 percent at the BC 1 , BC 2 , BC 3 andBC 4 stages, respectively), with a bias <strong>in</strong>favour of a higher rate of G. barbadenseallele transmission. This bias was probablydue to the <strong>selection</strong> pressure imposedat least <strong>in</strong> the BC 3 and BC 4 generations.Throughout the BC 1 and BC 2 generationsthat have undergone no deliberate <strong>selection</strong>,the <strong>in</strong>trogression of G. barbadensealleles (at the heterozygous state) coveredthe complete genome fairly well, i.e.<strong>in</strong>trogressed segments were found on allof the 26 chromosomes (not shown). Thisresult contradicts the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of Jiang et al.(2000) who detected important deficiencies<strong>in</strong> donor (G. barbadense) allele transmission<strong>in</strong> a population of 3 662 BC 3 plantsorig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from 21 BC 1 plants.After comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the SSR and AFLP<strong>marker</strong> data, it was observed that the <strong>in</strong>trogressionrate differed between target andnon-target regions. When averaged overthe 37 BC 4 plants, the percentage of <strong>in</strong>trogressedloci (8 percent genome-wide) wasmuch lower <strong>in</strong> the non-target regions(5 percent) than that reached with<strong>in</strong> targetregions (21 percent) (Table 4). The differentBC 4 plants <strong>in</strong>trogressed between three andsix QTL-rich target regions <strong>in</strong> differentcomb<strong>in</strong>ations. As an illustration of the<strong>selection</strong> pressure applied through the useof molecular <strong>marker</strong>s, Figure 3 shows thegraphical genotype of two BC 4 <strong>in</strong>dividualsas well as that of the BC 1 plant (No. 16)from which these <strong>in</strong>dividuals were derived.The two BC 4 plants had a common BC 1ancestor but orig<strong>in</strong>ated from two differentBC 2 plants. In this particular example,start<strong>in</strong>g from a common BC 1 plant (No.16) which harboured 13 out of 19 possibleQTL-rich regions, the two BC 4 plants(Nos. 104 and 419) derived from it partly orcompletely reta<strong>in</strong>ed respectively five (c16,c23top, c23bot, c25 and A03) and four (c6,c25, c26 and A01bot) genomic regions carry<strong>in</strong>gfavourable alleles. The other regionscarry<strong>in</strong>g QTL on c3, c4, c23, c20, A01 andA03, which had been <strong>in</strong>trogressed andwere heterozygous <strong>in</strong> the BC 1 plant, hadreturned to the homozygous G. hirsutum/G. hirsutum state. The percentages of <strong>in</strong>trogressedloci <strong>in</strong> target and non-target regions<strong>in</strong> these two examples were 29 and 10 percent,and of 29 and 5 percent <strong>in</strong> the two BC 4plants (Nos. 104 and 419) respectively.This example shows that, at least <strong>in</strong>some cases, the process used was efficient<strong>in</strong> select<strong>in</strong>g for chromosomal regionsof <strong>in</strong>terest (foreground <strong>selection</strong>), whileallow<strong>in</strong>g the rest of the genome to returntowards that of the recurrent parent.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!