12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

64Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fishFigure 3Frequency distribution for number of plus alleles found for five QTLs706050Number of plants4030201000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Number of plus allelesThe two contrast<strong>in</strong>g <strong>marker</strong> <strong>selection</strong>s, i.e. NUEplus (right) and NUEm<strong>in</strong> (left), are marked <strong>in</strong> blue.Figure 4Performance of the <strong>marker</strong> <strong>selection</strong>s, NUEm<strong>in</strong> (white) and NUEplus (blue) on hydroponicsat low N-supply (2.5%N <strong>in</strong> leaves) and high N-supply (5%N <strong>in</strong> leaves). The performance isexpressed as a percentage of the mean of the two <strong>selection</strong>s60 80 100 12060 80 100 120Tiller numberDry weight rootsDry weight shootsLeaf lengthRoot weight ratioLow N - supply High N - supply<strong>selection</strong> showed a remarkable 40 percenthigher tiller<strong>in</strong>g rate and dry matter productionthan the NUEm<strong>in</strong> <strong>selection</strong>. The40 percent higher tiller<strong>in</strong>g rate is associatedwith a 40 percent higher leaf area <strong>in</strong>creaseafter defoliation (data not shown). Relativeroot growth (expressed as the ratio of rootto total growth) and leaf length were hardly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!