12.07.2015 Views

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

marker-assisted selection in wheat - ictsd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158Marker-<strong>assisted</strong> <strong>selection</strong> – Current status and future perspectives <strong>in</strong> crops, livestock, forestry and fishFigure 2Breed<strong>in</strong>g scheme used for thepyramid<strong>in</strong>g of two resistanthomozygous genes (Sw5 and Pto) <strong>in</strong> thesusceptible genotype PI15PI15 x Stevens Sw5/Sw5F1BC 1 Sw5/-F1BC 2 Sw5/-F1BC 3 Sw5/-F1BC 4 Sw5/-XPI15 x Ontario Pto/PtoF1BC 1 Pto/-F1BC 2 Pto/-F1BC 3 Pto/-F1BC 4 Pto/-F 1 (F 1BC 4 x F 1BC 4 ) Sw5/-, Pto/-XF 2 (F 1BC 4 x F 1BC 4 ) Sw5/Sw5, Pto/Ptofixed at the homozygous stage at the F 3 BC 5generation.F<strong>in</strong>ally, besides the transfer of one resistancegene to each susceptible genotype, across<strong>in</strong>g scheme was undertaken to accumulatetwo or three resistance genes <strong>in</strong> thesame genotype. In this case, the decisionwas made to stop the backcross scheme atthe BC 3 or BC 4 generation as both parentall<strong>in</strong>es were cultivated varieties and hencegenetically very similar, and therefore therecovery of the recurrent genome couldbe satisfactory. F 1 BC 4 hybrids carry<strong>in</strong>g thesame genetic background <strong>in</strong> the recurrentparent have been <strong>in</strong>tercrossed, follow<strong>in</strong>gthe breed<strong>in</strong>g scheme shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.At the end of each F 1 BC 4 x F 1 BC 4 crossand after select<strong>in</strong>g the genotypes carry<strong>in</strong>gall the resistant alleles at the heterozygouslevel, one or two self<strong>in</strong>g generations will becarried out to fix all the resistant genes atthe homozygous level.This strategy has already started <strong>in</strong> somecases and the first homozygous multiresistantgenotypes have been obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Alsoavailable are two F 2 genotypes out of 52 analysedplants, obta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong>tercross<strong>in</strong>g theF 1 BC 4 progeny from PI15 x Stevens withthe F 1 BC 4 progeny from PI15 x Ontario(Table 4). This F 2 generation exhibited twogenotypes carry<strong>in</strong>g both resistant genesSw5 and Pto at the homozygous level aswell as 29 genotypes carry<strong>in</strong>g both genes atthe heterozygous level.The work reported here on transferr<strong>in</strong>gresistance genes among tomato genotypesdemonstrates the usefulness of MAS forimprov<strong>in</strong>g traditional breed<strong>in</strong>g strategies.The contribution of molecular <strong>marker</strong>sl<strong>in</strong>ked to resistance genes was very efficient<strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the time and space necessaryfor <strong>selection</strong>, enabl<strong>in</strong>g both early screen<strong>in</strong>gfor resistance and reduced numbers ofgenotypes to be transplanted. The mostchalleng<strong>in</strong>g work was the search for suitable<strong>marker</strong>s, which often required bothconsiderable time and f<strong>in</strong>ancial resources.Different strategies were used successfullyto f<strong>in</strong>d the most suitable <strong>marker</strong>s to performMAS for transferr<strong>in</strong>g eight resistance genes<strong>in</strong>to superior tomato genotypes; such strategiescould be repeated <strong>in</strong> tomato for manyother genes due to advanced molecularknowledge of the genome of this species.PERSPECTIVESThe availability of PCR-based <strong>marker</strong>sfor many resistance genes allows MAS forbiotic resistance <strong>in</strong> tomato to be appliedsuccessfully <strong>in</strong> any laboratory without theneed for highly sophisticated techniques.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!