Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

It is assumed that the rollout of the pilots would be on a phased basis with the firstpilot in year 1, followed by four pilots in year 2 and the remaining 5 pilots beingimplemented in year 3. The total establishment and rollout cost of the 10 remoteinterpreting pilot sites amounts to circa €60,000.The remote interpreting costs for phase two (years 4-6) are not estimated, asthese will be determined by the outcome of the pilots conducted in phase one.8.2.5 SLI marketing/promotion and awareness buildingSubstantial marketing and promotion of SLI services to the Deaf community andpublic service users, is essential in the future.A budget for this activity is built into the funding requirement, with awarenessbuilding initiatives €60,000 in year 1 and an average annual budget for years 2 to6 of approximately €27,000. An increase in the budget is allowed for in year 4 tosupport the rollout of the national remote interpreting service.8.2.6 AdministrationKey components of the administration costs associated with the establishment andrunning of the Irish Sign Language Interpretation Service include:• Initial company formation (of the new entity, the Irish Sign LanguageInterpretation Service)• Annual audit fees• Staff recruitment• Research and development, particularly on assessment of appropriatetechnologies for remote interpreting, in year 2• Expenses associated with the Board and the SLI Advisory GroupThe total estimated administration cost for the six year timeframe is approximately€185,000, with phase one accounting for €144,000 (€53,000 in year 1 and€73,000 in year 2) and phase two amounting to circa €41,000.8.3 FUNDING THE DEVELOPMENT AND ONGOINGADMINISTRATION OF SLI SERVICESThere is a social cost associated with making public services accessible to the Deafcommunity and developing a quality interpretation service for the Deaf.Development funding needs to be invested in the service by the State.The extent to which the Irish Sign Language Interpretation Service will be able tofund the development and ongoing administration of the service, in the future, willbe influenced by:• The overall level of demand for SLI services• The efficiency of the organisation and how it is run• The administration fee set by the Irish Sign Language Interpretation ServiceThe fees to be paid by the Irish Sign Language Interpretation Service to theinterpreters would be recommended by IASLI. However, when setting thepage 138 • Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service Requirements in Ireland
administration fee, the Irish Sign Language Interpretation Service would need tostrike a balance between the following:• The Irish Sign Language Interpretation Service's operational costs e.g.premises, staffing, IT• The need for fees to be competitive and not so high that they discouragethe use of interpreters, particularly by public service users• The appropriate administration fee to charge for face-to-face versusremote interpretingThe following two options exist for funding the development and ongoingadministration costs of SLI services in Ireland:• A percentage of the expenditure by Government departments/State agencieson SLI services could be allocated to the Irish Sign Language InterpretationService to cover the development and administration of the service. This islikely to be a complex and cumbersome process.• The Department of Social and Family Affairs could take ownership for fundingthe core development and administration costs of the Irish Sign LanguageInterpretation Service, on behalf of the entire public sector.Irrespective of which funding option is chosen, it is essential that the developmentand administration costs of SLI services in Ireland (borne by the Irish SignLanguage Interpretation Service) are adequately funded.Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service Requirements in Ireland • page 139
Page 1:
RESEARCH SERIESSEPTEMBER 2006Review
Page 4:
4.8 Theme 6: Accreditation and a fo
Page 7:
PrefaceAs proposed in the Outline S
Page 10 and 11:
Key players involved in SLI service
Page 12 and 13:
Interpreter staffing and skillsIt i
Page 14 and 15:
INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICEThe rese
Page 16 and 17:
appears to be growing in popularity
Page 18 and 19:
• Personalised service - A person
Page 20 and 21:
• The establishment of a new enti
Page 22 and 23:
• Further development of the Iris
Page 24 and 25:
• Estimated cost in year 1 is €
Page 26 and 27:
1.3 REVIEW OBJECTIVES and SCOPE1.3.
Page 28 and 29:
2 Review Methodology2.1 APPROACHFig
Page 30 and 31:
Interviews and discussions• Inter
Page 32 and 33:
3 Overview of CurrentSign LanguageI
Page 34 and 35:
Table 3.1. Persons aged 15 to 64, w
Page 36 and 37:
3.2 POLICY AND LEGISLATION3.2.1 Int
Page 38 and 39:
Sustaining Progress, Social Partner
Page 40 and 41:
According to the Education Act 1998
Page 42 and 43:
3.4 KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN SLI SER
Page 44 and 45:
upholding the status of Irish Sign
Page 46 and 47:
3. A Deaf user or service provider
Page 48 and 49:
3.5.3 Main reasons for accessing se
Page 50 and 51:
InternetThe internet and email have
Page 52 and 53:
As shown in the table above, there
Page 54 and 55:
Figure 3.10. Total number of interp
Page 56 and 57:
The first cohort of students on the
Page 58 and 59:
Looking at the summary financial an
Page 60 and 61:
3.7.2 Overall client spend on sign
Page 62 and 63:
The public sector service providers
Page 64 and 65:
4.3 THEME 1:THE NEED FOR SIGN LANGU
Page 66 and 67:
subject for both Deaf and hearing s
Page 68 and 69:
4.5 THEME 3:ACCESS TO SLI SERVICES
Page 70 and 71:
4.6 THEME 4:THE QUALITY OF SLI AND
Page 72 and 73:
primary client of the interpreter.
Page 74 and 75:
4.8.1 The impact of the absence of
Page 76 and 77:
4.9.3 What is neededFunding is need
Page 78 and 79:
4.10.3 A quality service on the gro
Page 80 and 81:
Table 5.1. Key statistics on SLI se
Page 82 and 83:
The research has considered mainstr
Page 84 and 85:
Summary• Other than where the par
Page 86 and 87:
5.2.1 Linguistic approachIn all of
Page 88 and 89: Interpreting services are also prov
Page 90 and 91: 5.3.1 Population distributionMost o
Page 92 and 93: 5.3.3 Responsibility for booking in
Page 94 and 95: 5.3.4 Sign language interpretersSal
Page 96 and 97: The use of videophones and webcams
Page 98 and 99: • It provides a flexible solution
Page 100 and 101: 5.5 QUALITY OF SLI SERVICES DEFINED
Page 102 and 103: 5.5.2 Interpreter training courses
Page 104 and 105: Pressure for the registration and r
Page 106 and 107: Proposal (which has been agreed wit
Page 108 and 109: • In most of the countries includ
Page 110 and 111: Table 5.6. Overview of key strength
Page 112 and 113: 6 Summary ofKey Findings6.1 INTRODU
Page 114 and 115: 6.3 KEY AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN TH
Page 116 and 117: 7 Recommended FutureModel for Deliv
Page 118 and 119: 7.2 RECOMMENDED FUTURE SLI SERVICE
Page 120 and 121: Table 7.2. Key areas for improvemen
Page 122 and 123: 7.3.2 Comhairle - oversight of SLI
Page 124 and 125: There are substantial risks associa
Page 126 and 127: Requirements:• Excellent project
Page 128 and 129: 7.3.9 ComplaintsThe Irish Sign Lang
Page 130 and 131: number of Deaf clubs. The videophon
Page 132 and 133: 7.6 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS TO SUPPOR
Page 134 and 135: Accreditation should be linked to t
Page 136 and 137: videophone technology, piloted in t
Page 140 and 141: Appendix 1: Bibliographyand Referen
Page 142 and 143: www.bris.ac.uk/deaf - Bristol Centr
Page 144 and 145: SASLISLAISLISLIANZSMSTCDVCOThe Scot
show all

Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?