Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.8 Theme 6: Accreditation and a formal registration process for 73interpreters is one of the most urgent priorities indeveloping SLI services in Ireland4.9 Theme 7: Planned investment in technology could significantly 75improve SLI services, but should not be seen as analternative to the development of face-to-face SLI services4.10 Theme 8: Key elements mentioned during the consultation in 76relation to a future model for delivering SLI services5. International best practice 795.1 Introduction 795.2 Current norms and entitlements in relation to SLI services 845.3 Delivery and organisation of SLI services 895.4 Technological developments internationally 955.5 Quality of SLI services defined, measured and managed 1005.6 Funding of SLI services internationally 1055.7 Overview of the strengths and weaknesses of current SLI 109service provision6. Summary of key findings 1126.1 Introduction 1126.2 Key positive aspects of the current SLI service in Ireland 1126.3 Key areas for improvement in the current SLI service in Ireland 1147. Recommended future model for delivering sign language 116interpretation services7.1 Introduction 1167.2 Recommended future SLI service model: a two phased approach 1187.3 Phase one: establish the Irish Sign Language Interpretation Service 121as a new entity and commence piloting of remote interpreting7.4 Phase two: develop and rollout remote interpreting services 1287.5 Advantages and risks of the recommended future SLI service model 1317.6 Other recommendations to support the delivery of SLI services 132outside the scope of this review8. Funding required to support the implementation of the 135recommended future SLI service model8.1 Introduction 1358.2 Overview of estimated future expenditure 1368.3 Funding the development and ongoing administration of SLI services 138page 4 • Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service Requirements in Ireland
Page 1: RESEARCH SERIESSEPTEMBER 2006Review
Page 6 and 7: Table 5.3Table 5.4Table 5.5Table 5.
Page 9 and 10: SLI service providers, and leading
Page 11 and 12: In addition, SLI services are also
Page 13 and 14: The prices charged by Irish Sign Li
Page 15 and 16: Using CSO 2011 population projectio
Page 17 and 18: Country Strengths WeaknessesFinland
Page 19 and 20: Overview of the two phased approach
Page 21 and 22: Deaf community. All Board members s
Page 23 and 24: where Deaf people need access to in
Page 25 and 26: 1 Introduction1.1 OVERVIEWIrish Sig
Page 27 and 28: - Booking and accessing services- O
Page 29 and 30: Phase 1: Project Set-up and Kick-of
Page 31 and 32: Phase 6: Final report and presentat
Page 33 and 34: 3.1.1 Definition and background of
Page 35 and 36: This information is provided in ord
Page 37 and 38: the move to mainstream services for
Page 39 and 40: • Access to any facility or benef
Page 41 and 42: The Access Rules set targets to be
Page 43 and 44: Department of Social and Family Aff
Page 45 and 46: Associated with the Kerry Deaf Reso
Page 47 and 48: In reviewing the above information,
Page 49 and 50: a social event (wedding, funeral et
Page 51 and 52: communicate and reads off the scree
Page 53 and 54: The map below highlights the uneven
Page 55 and 56:
The Board of Irish Sign Link appoin
Page 57 and 58:
3.7 FUNDINGSign language interpreta
Page 59 and 60:
Table 3.15 Updated Irish Sign Link
Page 61 and 62:
4 Messages from theConsultation4.1
Page 63 and 64:
Core themes from the consultationTh
Page 65 and 66:
as to the scope of this funding, fo
Page 67 and 68:
access to public services and the c
Page 69 and 70:
arts. While these areas may be cove
Page 71 and 72:
4.6.2 The quality of the booking se
Page 73 and 74:
Deaf contributors from outside Dubl
Page 75 and 76:
context, and with Irish Sign Langua
Page 77 and 78:
were absence of provision for a man
Page 79 and 80:
5 International BestPractice5.1 INT
Page 81 and 82:
Each country has its own legislativ
Page 83 and 84:
1970s and 1980s, and have officiall
Page 85 and 86:
Table 5.2. International comparison
Page 87 and 88:
the UK's Disability Discrimination
Page 89 and 90:
Register of BSL/English Interpreter
Page 91 and 92:
services, a national provider may s
Page 93 and 94:
Service provider userWhere responsi
Page 95 and 96:
SummaryThis review of how SLI servi
Page 97 and 98:
Significant, has also been contract
Page 99 and 100:
There is a new online service devel
Page 101 and 102:
Table 5.4. International SLI profes
Page 103 and 104:
interpreting. These standards have
Page 105 and 106:
een to link agency registration to
Page 107 and 108:
Table 5.5. International funding ar
Page 109 and 110:
efusing to pay the recommended rate
Page 111 and 112:
Country Strengths WeaknessesDenmark
Page 113 and 114:
Co-ordinated access to interpreters
Page 115 and 116:
emerged as a necessary 'stop gap' t
Page 117 and 118:
• Promotion and awareness raising
Page 119 and 120:
7.2.3 How the future service model
Page 121 and 122:
7.3 PHASE ONE:ESTABLISH THE IRISH S
Page 123 and 124:
4. BookingA central booking service
Page 125 and 126:
Finance OfficerRole:• Financial a
Page 127 and 128:
7.3.6 technology-enabled remote int
Page 129 and 130:
7.4.2 Irish Sign Language Interpret
Page 131 and 132:
7.5 ADVANTAGES AND RISKS OF THE REC
Page 133 and 134:
7.6.2 Interpreter skills and traini
Page 135 and 136:
8 Funding Requiredto Support theImp
Page 137 and 138:
qualified interpreters would be emp
Page 139 and 140:
administration fee, the Irish Sign
Page 141 and 142:
Houses of the Oireachtas (2000), Ed
Page 143 and 144:
Appendix 2: List ofAbbreviationsAHE
Page 145:
Comhairle is the national agency re
show all

Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?