Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3.7.2 Overall client spend on sign language interpretation servicesThe total fee income from all Irish Sign Link clients provides an indication of theoverall expenditure on SLI services in Ireland. However, it is important to note thatthis does not include fees paid by clients directly to interpreters or to otherproviders of sign language interpretation services. The following figure indicatesthe total value of monies invoiced to all Irish Sign Link clients since 2003 16 .Figure 3.16 Total monies invoiced by Irish Sign Link 2003-20052005(up toJune)254,4492004404,3332003328,891€0 €50,000 €100,000 €150,000 €200,000 €250,000 €300,000 €350,000 €400,000 €450,000Source: Information provided by Irish Sign Link, August 2005The above graph indicates that overall client spend on sign languageinterpretation services has been increasing since 2003. In 2003 Irish Sign Linkissued invoices for a total of €328,891, in 2004 this figure was €404,333 and upuntil June 2005 it was €254,449. This is a high figure considering it is for a sixmonth period. If that rate of expenditure were to be sustained for the second halfof 2005, the overall figure for the year would be almost €509,000.16 This graph shows the total monies invoiced to clients by Irish Sign Link for sign language interpretation services accessed through Irish Sign Link.It does not include other spending on interpretation services not accessed through Irish Sign Link.page 60 • Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service Requirements in Ireland
4 Messages from theConsultation4.1 INTRODUCTIONThe objective of this chapter is to feedback the key messages emerging from theconsultation process. This chapter is structured as follows:4.1 Introduction4.2 Background4.3-4.10 Themes 1-84.2 BACKGROUNDIn the brief for this review, Comhairle indicated that the review process shouldinclude consultation with major stakeholders, in order to establish their views oncurrent provision and the requirements of a good quality SLI service. The groupsto be consulted included the Deaf community, providers of SLI services, relevantvoluntary/community and statutory providers.The consultation process was designed in partnership with Comhairle, and withthe assistance and advice of the Irish Deaf Society, National Association for DeafPeople, the Mid-West Deaf Association and Irish Sign Link.The consultation involved:• Three consultation workshops with members of the Deaf community• One consultation workshop with public sector service providers• Interviews and discussions with a number of organisations and individuals whohave a particular expertise, knowledge, interest or involvement in the provisionof sign language interpretation services.4.2.1 The consultation workshops with Deaf peopleThe workshops aimed to gather the views of Deaf people who would have manydifferent kinds of needs for sign language interpretation. Participants includedpeople in employment and further education, home-makers, men, women, olderpeople, young people, people in areas where sign language interpretation isreadily available, and people living in rural areas where there is very limitedaccess. Two workshops with the Deaf community were held in Dublin, and onein Limerick. A total of thirty-three (33) Deaf people attended the workshops.Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service Requirements in Ireland • page 61
Page 1:
RESEARCH SERIESSEPTEMBER 2006Review
Page 4:
4.8 Theme 6: Accreditation and a fo
Page 7:
PrefaceAs proposed in the Outline S
Page 10 and 11: Key players involved in SLI service
Page 12 and 13: Interpreter staffing and skillsIt i
Page 14 and 15: INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICEThe rese
Page 16 and 17: appears to be growing in popularity
Page 18 and 19: • Personalised service - A person
Page 20 and 21: • The establishment of a new enti
Page 22 and 23: • Further development of the Iris
Page 24 and 25: • Estimated cost in year 1 is €
Page 26 and 27: 1.3 REVIEW OBJECTIVES and SCOPE1.3.
Page 28 and 29: 2 Review Methodology2.1 APPROACHFig
Page 30 and 31: Interviews and discussions• Inter
Page 32 and 33: 3 Overview of CurrentSign LanguageI
Page 34 and 35: Table 3.1. Persons aged 15 to 64, w
Page 36 and 37: 3.2 POLICY AND LEGISLATION3.2.1 Int
Page 38 and 39: Sustaining Progress, Social Partner
Page 40 and 41: According to the Education Act 1998
Page 42 and 43: 3.4 KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN SLI SER
Page 44 and 45: upholding the status of Irish Sign
Page 46 and 47: 3. A Deaf user or service provider
Page 48 and 49: 3.5.3 Main reasons for accessing se
Page 50 and 51: InternetThe internet and email have
Page 52 and 53: As shown in the table above, there
Page 54 and 55: Figure 3.10. Total number of interp
Page 56 and 57: The first cohort of students on the
Page 58 and 59: Looking at the summary financial an
Page 62 and 63: The public sector service providers
Page 64 and 65: 4.3 THEME 1:THE NEED FOR SIGN LANGU
Page 66 and 67: subject for both Deaf and hearing s
Page 68 and 69: 4.5 THEME 3:ACCESS TO SLI SERVICES
Page 70 and 71: 4.6 THEME 4:THE QUALITY OF SLI AND
Page 72 and 73: primary client of the interpreter.
Page 74 and 75: 4.8.1 The impact of the absence of
Page 76 and 77: 4.9.3 What is neededFunding is need
Page 78 and 79: 4.10.3 A quality service on the gro
Page 80 and 81: Table 5.1. Key statistics on SLI se
Page 82 and 83: The research has considered mainstr
Page 84 and 85: Summary• Other than where the par
Page 86 and 87: 5.2.1 Linguistic approachIn all of
Page 88 and 89: Interpreting services are also prov
Page 90 and 91: 5.3.1 Population distributionMost o
Page 92 and 93: 5.3.3 Responsibility for booking in
Page 94 and 95: 5.3.4 Sign language interpretersSal
Page 96 and 97: The use of videophones and webcams
Page 98 and 99: • It provides a flexible solution
Page 100 and 101: 5.5 QUALITY OF SLI SERVICES DEFINED
Page 102 and 103: 5.5.2 Interpreter training courses
Page 104 and 105: Pressure for the registration and r
Page 106 and 107: Proposal (which has been agreed wit
Page 108 and 109: • In most of the countries includ
Page 110 and 111:
Table 5.6. Overview of key strength
Page 112 and 113:
6 Summary ofKey Findings6.1 INTRODU
Page 114 and 115:
6.3 KEY AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN TH
Page 116 and 117:
7 Recommended FutureModel for Deliv
Page 118 and 119:
7.2 RECOMMENDED FUTURE SLI SERVICE
Page 120 and 121:
Table 7.2. Key areas for improvemen
Page 122 and 123:
7.3.2 Comhairle - oversight of SLI
Page 124 and 125:
There are substantial risks associa
Page 126 and 127:
Requirements:• Excellent project
Page 128 and 129:
7.3.9 ComplaintsThe Irish Sign Lang
Page 130 and 131:
number of Deaf clubs. The videophon
Page 132 and 133:
7.6 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS TO SUPPOR
Page 134 and 135:
Accreditation should be linked to t
Page 136 and 137:
videophone technology, piloted in t
Page 138 and 139:
It is assumed that the rollout of t
Page 140 and 141:
Appendix 1: Bibliographyand Referen
Page 142 and 143:
www.bris.ac.uk/deaf - Bristol Centr
Page 144 and 145:
SASLISLAISLISLIANZSMSTCDVCOThe Scot
show all

Review of Sign Language Interpretation Services and Service ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?