- Page 1:
RESEARCH SERIESSEPTEMBER 2006Review
- Page 4:
4.8 Theme 6: Accreditation and a fo
- Page 7:
PrefaceAs proposed in the Outline S
- Page 10 and 11:
Key players involved in SLI service
- Page 12 and 13:
Interpreter staffing and skillsIt i
- Page 14 and 15:
INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICEThe rese
- Page 16 and 17:
appears to be growing in popularity
- Page 18 and 19:
• Personalised service - A person
- Page 20 and 21:
• The establishment of a new enti
- Page 22 and 23:
• Further development of the Iris
- Page 24 and 25:
• Estimated cost in year 1 is €
- Page 26 and 27:
1.3 REVIEW OBJECTIVES and SCOPE1.3.
- Page 28 and 29:
2 Review Methodology2.1 APPROACHFig
- Page 30 and 31:
Interviews and discussions• Inter
- Page 32 and 33:
3 Overview of CurrentSign LanguageI
- Page 34 and 35:
Table 3.1. Persons aged 15 to 64, w
- Page 36 and 37:
3.2 POLICY AND LEGISLATION3.2.1 Int
- Page 38 and 39:
Sustaining Progress, Social Partner
- Page 40 and 41:
According to the Education Act 1998
- Page 42 and 43:
3.4 KEY PLAYERS INVOLVED IN SLI SER
- Page 44 and 45:
upholding the status of Irish Sign
- Page 46 and 47:
3. A Deaf user or service provider
- Page 48 and 49:
3.5.3 Main reasons for accessing se
- Page 50 and 51:
InternetThe internet and email have
- Page 52 and 53:
As shown in the table above, there
- Page 54 and 55:
Figure 3.10. Total number of interp
- Page 56 and 57:
The first cohort of students on the
- Page 58 and 59:
Looking at the summary financial an
- Page 60 and 61:
3.7.2 Overall client spend on sign
- Page 62 and 63:
The public sector service providers
- Page 64 and 65:
4.3 THEME 1:THE NEED FOR SIGN LANGU
- Page 66 and 67:
subject for both Deaf and hearing s
- Page 68 and 69:
4.5 THEME 3:ACCESS TO SLI SERVICES
- Page 70 and 71:
4.6 THEME 4:THE QUALITY OF SLI AND
- Page 72 and 73:
primary client of the interpreter.
- Page 74 and 75:
4.8.1 The impact of the absence of
- Page 76 and 77:
4.9.3 What is neededFunding is need
- Page 78 and 79:
4.10.3 A quality service on the gro
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 5.1. Key statistics on SLI se
- Page 82 and 83:
The research has considered mainstr
- Page 84 and 85:
Summary• Other than where the par
- Page 86 and 87:
5.2.1 Linguistic approachIn all of
- Page 88 and 89:
Interpreting services are also prov
- Page 90 and 91:
5.3.1 Population distributionMost o
- Page 92 and 93:
5.3.3 Responsibility for booking in
- Page 94 and 95: 5.3.4 Sign language interpretersSal
- Page 96 and 97: The use of videophones and webcams
- Page 98 and 99: • It provides a flexible solution
- Page 100 and 101: 5.5 QUALITY OF SLI SERVICES DEFINED
- Page 102 and 103: 5.5.2 Interpreter training courses
- Page 104 and 105: Pressure for the registration and r
- Page 106 and 107: Proposal (which has been agreed wit
- Page 108 and 109: • In most of the countries includ
- Page 110 and 111: Table 5.6. Overview of key strength
- Page 112 and 113: 6 Summary ofKey Findings6.1 INTRODU
- Page 114 and 115: 6.3 KEY AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT IN TH
- Page 116 and 117: 7 Recommended FutureModel for Deliv
- Page 118 and 119: 7.2 RECOMMENDED FUTURE SLI SERVICE
- Page 120 and 121: Table 7.2. Key areas for improvemen
- Page 122 and 123: 7.3.2 Comhairle - oversight of SLI
- Page 124 and 125: There are substantial risks associa
- Page 126 and 127: Requirements:• Excellent project
- Page 128 and 129: 7.3.9 ComplaintsThe Irish Sign Lang
- Page 130 and 131: number of Deaf clubs. The videophon
- Page 132 and 133: 7.6 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS TO SUPPOR
- Page 134 and 135: Accreditation should be linked to t
- Page 136 and 137: videophone technology, piloted in t
- Page 138 and 139: It is assumed that the rollout of t
- Page 140 and 141: Appendix 1: Bibliographyand Referen
- Page 142 and 143: www.bris.ac.uk/deaf - Bristol Centr