education 7995 per cent children aged 6–14 are <strong>in</strong> school <strong>in</strong> HimachalPradesh, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu; only 70 per cent areenrolled <strong>in</strong> Bihar. Even when compared with relativelydisadvantaged states such as Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh,and Madhya Pradesh, Bihar is particularly strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> its lowenrolment levels. 8 A sex-disaggregated exam<strong>in</strong>ation suggeststhat while both boys and girls <strong>in</strong> Bihar are less likely to be<strong>in</strong> school, girls <strong>in</strong> Bihar are particularly disadvantaged. Forexample, enrolment rates among boys and girls <strong>in</strong> MadhyaPradesh are 85 per cent and 80 per cent, respectively, whilerates for boys and girls <strong>in</strong> Bihar are 76 per cent and 63per cent, respectively.The IHDS also asked about absences from school <strong>in</strong> themonth before the survey. While a day or two of absence isunlikely to have a significant effect on education, an absenceof six or more days <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g month could be quitedetrimental. The results <strong>in</strong> the fourth column of TableA.6.3a show that at an all <strong>India</strong> level, about 20 per centof children experienced this lengthy absence. Children <strong>in</strong>villages with low <strong>in</strong>frastructure and poorer children are morelikely to be absent. 9The IHDS survey is unusual <strong>in</strong> collect<strong>in</strong>g data onwhether students have ever failed or repeated a class. TheIHDS data show that about 5 per cent of students <strong>in</strong> Standards1–5 ever failed or had to repeat a class, compared to9 per cent <strong>in</strong> Standards 6–10. While Adivasi students aresomewhat more likely to fail or be held back than others(9 per cent verses 5–8 percent for all other groups), socialclass differences <strong>in</strong> repeat<strong>in</strong>g or fail<strong>in</strong>g a class are far smallerthan state-level differences (see Table A.6.3b). Ironically,these differences do not correspond to state-level enrolmentdifferences (noted above) and learn<strong>in</strong>g differences (noted<strong>in</strong> a subsequent section). Himachal Pradesh has the largestproportion of students reported be<strong>in</strong>g held back: 19per cent of 6–14 year olds. At the same time, this is thestate with one of the greatest enrolment rates and higherlevels of educational quality compared with other states.Other states with high reported rates of be<strong>in</strong>g held backare Uttarakhand, the northeastern states, and Gujarat. Incontrast, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Rajasthan—states witha relatively poor record, otherwise—have some of the lowestrates of failure or repeat<strong>in</strong>g a grade.EDUCATIONAL QUALITYWith rapidly ris<strong>in</strong>g school enrolment, attention must turnto educational quality. This section reports the results fromskill tests described above. The goal of these tests was tomeasure students’ performance on the three R’s: read<strong>in</strong>g,writ<strong>in</strong>g, and arithmetic. This section focuses on childrenaged 8–11 because all of these children should have acquiredthe basic read<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g, and arithmetic skills. The read<strong>in</strong>gskills are divided <strong>in</strong>to five categories: cannot read at all,can read letters, can read words, can read a short paragraph,and can read a short story. The results presented <strong>in</strong> Figure6.2a show that 11 per cent of the children surveyed cannotrecognize letters, 14 per cent recognize letters butcannot read words, 21 per cent can read words but notconnect them <strong>in</strong>to sentences, 22 per cent can read simpletwo-to-three sentence paragraphs but not a one-pagestory, and 33 per cent can read a one-page story. Because 95per cent of the children tested completed at least Standard1 and 65 per cent completed Standard 2, they are generallyexpected to be able read at least a simple paragraph withthree sentences. This is what is def<strong>in</strong>ed as read<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong>the subsequent discussion.The arithmetic skills are divided <strong>in</strong>to four categories:no recognition of written numbers, can read numbers,can subtract a two-digit number from another two-digitnumber, and can divide a three-digit number with aone-digit number. The results presented <strong>in</strong> Figure 6.2bshow that among the IHDS sample of 8–11 year oldchildren, 19 per cent cannot identify numbers between 10and 99, 33 per cent can identify numbers only, a further26 per cent can subtract two-digit numbers with borrow<strong>in</strong>gbut cannot divide numbers, and 22 per cent can divide aswell as subtract. Aga<strong>in</strong>, two-digit subtraction is consideredto be a basic numerical skill that 8–11 year olds should have.Thus, <strong>in</strong> all subsequent discussion, we focus on this skill asthe basic arithmetic skill.In terms of writ<strong>in</strong>g, 8–11 year olds are expected tobe able to write a simple sentence—such as, ‘My mother’sname is Madhuben’—with two or fewer mistakes. About 67per cent of the kids were able to do this.Table A.6.4a shows differences <strong>in</strong> these achievementlevels for children from different backgrounds. The impactof family background on children’s skills acquisition is fargreater than that noted above on school enrolment. Only45 per cent of children from the lowest <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tilefamilies are able to read a short paragraph, while 73per cent of children from the highest qu<strong>in</strong>tile are able to doso. Among higher caste H<strong>in</strong>dus and other religious groups,more than 70 per cent of children are able to read a shortparagraph. This figure is only 44–46 per cent for Dalit,Adivasi, and Muslim children. Urban–rural differences8ASER 2005, conducted by PRATHAM at around the same time as the IHDS, also found that among major states, Bihar has the lowest enrolmentrates (PRATHAM 2005).9It is important to use caution <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g the data on absences. The survey was conducted over nearly one year. Although the question askedabout absences <strong>in</strong> the month preced<strong>in</strong>g survey or, if survey was conducted <strong>in</strong> a month with holidays, <strong>in</strong> the last regular school month, some of the state-levelvariations could be due to differences <strong>in</strong> survey tim<strong>in</strong>g.
80 human development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>diaFigure 6.2aSource: IHDS 2004–5 data.Read<strong>in</strong>g Skills of Children Aged 8–11 (<strong>in</strong> per cent)Figure 6.2bSource: IHDS 2004–5 data.Arithmetic Skills of Children Aged 8–11 (<strong>in</strong> per cent)are pretty large, as are those between households <strong>in</strong> whichadults have had some education and those <strong>in</strong> which alladults lack literacy. Table A.6.4b documents the differences<strong>in</strong> these skills across states. These differences are also vast.More than 80 per cent of children <strong>in</strong> Himachal Pradesh andKerala can read a short paragraph, while only 39, 40, and 44per cent can do so <strong>in</strong> Uttar Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir,and Bihar, respectively.Like the ASER surveys conducted by PRATHAM,the IHDS survey found that students’ achievement onarithmetic tests is lower than their achievement <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>gtests. Social class differences <strong>in</strong> arithmetic skills seem tobe somewhat larger than those <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g skills. In an eraof <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g technical sophistication, this is a worrisomeobservation. Regional diversity <strong>in</strong> arithmetic skill acquisitionis also strik<strong>in</strong>g. While Kerala leads the nation <strong>in</strong> read<strong>in</strong>gand writ<strong>in</strong>g skills, it lags beh<strong>in</strong>d many states, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gHimachal Pradesh, Punjab, Delhi, and the North-East, <strong>in</strong>mathematical skills.COSTS OF EDUCATIONEducational costs <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> <strong>in</strong>volve a variety of expenditures,with school fees form<strong>in</strong>g only a small part of those expenditures.Transportation, uniforms, and books are other majorcomponents. Moreover, with the grow<strong>in</strong>g importance ofprivate tutor<strong>in</strong>g, private coach<strong>in</strong>g expenditures can also besubstantial for students obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g coach<strong>in</strong>g.Figure 6.3 shows the distribution of different educationalexpenditures by standard attended.The annual total expenditure per child aged 6–14ranges from Rs 933 for a child <strong>in</strong> Standard 1 to Rs 2,983for child <strong>in</strong> Standard 10. The higher expenses for a child<strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>dergarten reflect the high likelihood of k<strong>in</strong>dergartenenrolment <strong>in</strong> private nurseries. Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, while thecost of fees climbs slowly at higher standards, the costsfor other educational components climb sharply. These all<strong>India</strong> figures mask the high costs of private tuition becausethey average across all students, whether they pay tuition,or not. The cost of private tutor<strong>in</strong>g ranges from Rs 630per year <strong>in</strong> Standard 1 to nearly Rs 1,500 <strong>in</strong> Standard 10.These educational costs of Rs 933–2,983— per year, perchild—should be seen <strong>in</strong> the context of the annual <strong>in</strong>comeof <strong>India</strong>n families, with median <strong>in</strong>come be<strong>in</strong>g Rs 27,857 peryear (Chapter 2).While the gender gap <strong>in</strong> school enrolment is fast clos<strong>in</strong>g,educational expenditures on girls are consistently lower thanthose for boys. As Figure 6.4 shows, these differences areapproximately 10–12 per cent at most educational levels.These differences come both from a slightly lowerlikelihood of girls’ enrolment <strong>in</strong> private schools and privatetutor<strong>in</strong>g, and from policies <strong>in</strong> some states that offer educationto girls at lower or no fees.Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, educational expenditures are higher <strong>in</strong>urban areas and among better off and more educated families.Attention to these social class differences <strong>in</strong> educationalexpenditures is important as we try to understand <strong>in</strong>equalities<strong>in</strong> children’s educational outcomes based on parental socialclass. As Figure 6.5 documents, families <strong>in</strong> the top <strong>in</strong>comequ<strong>in</strong>tiles spend about eight times the amount spent by thelowest <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile on school fees, largely because theysend children to private schools and spend five times as muchon private tutor<strong>in</strong>g.
- Page 1 and 2:
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN INDIAUMANEVELO
- Page 4 and 5:
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN INDIAHUMANDEVE
- Page 6:
ToThe 41,554 households who partici
- Page 9 and 10:
viiicontentsSOCIAL CHANGES11. Socia
- Page 11 and 12:
x tables, figures, and boxes6.1 Enr
- Page 13 and 14:
xiitables, figures, and boxes6.1a L
- Page 16 and 17:
ForewordIndia has been fortunate as
- Page 18 and 19:
PrefaceOn account of the size of it
- Page 20:
acknowledgements xixWhile space doe
- Page 23 and 24:
xxii research team and advisorsO.P.
- Page 25 and 26:
AbbreviationsASERBPLCHCDPTFPSHCRHDI
- Page 28 and 29:
1IntroductionLong years ago we made
- Page 30 and 31:
introduction 5the agricultural stag
- Page 32:
introduction 7on income points out,
- Page 36 and 37:
2Income, Poverty, and InequalityAs
- Page 38 and 39:
income, poverty, and inequality 13t
- Page 40 and 41:
income, poverty, and inequality 15A
- Page 42 and 43:
income, poverty, and inequality 173
- Page 44 and 45:
income, poverty, and inequality 19R
- Page 46 and 47:
income, poverty, and inequality 21T
- Page 48 and 49:
income, poverty, and inequality 23D
- Page 50 and 51:
income, poverty, and inequality 25T
- Page 52 and 53:
income, poverty, and inequality 27T
- Page 54 and 55: agriculture 29Figure 3.1Source: IHD
- Page 56 and 57: agriculture 31Figure 3.2bSource: IH
- Page 58 and 59: agriculture 33other religious minor
- Page 60 and 61: agriculture 35Figure 3.5Source: IHD
- Page 62 and 63: agriculture 37Table A.3.1aCultivati
- Page 64 and 65: 4EmploymentChapter 2 noted tremendo
- Page 66 and 67: employment 41Box 4.1Education Does
- Page 68 and 69: employment 43in urban areas, animal
- Page 70 and 71: employment 45not surprising that Ta
- Page 72 and 73: employment 47These agricultural and
- Page 74 and 75: employment 49Table A.4.1a Work Part
- Page 76 and 77: employment 51Table A.4.2a: Number o
- Page 78 and 79: employment 53Table A.4.3a: Type of
- Page 80 and 81: employment 55Table A.4.3b: Statewis
- Page 82 and 83: employment 57Table A.4.4b: Statewis
- Page 84 and 85: employment 59Table A.4.5b: Statewis
- Page 86 and 87: household assets and amenities 61WA
- Page 88 and 89: household assets and amenities 63Bo
- Page 90 and 91: household assets and amenities 65Fi
- Page 92 and 93: household assets and amenities 67an
- Page 94 and 95: household assets and amenities 69Bo
- Page 96: household assets and amenities 71Ta
- Page 100 and 101: 6EducationThe chapters on income (C
- Page 102 and 103: education 77Figure 6.1aSource: IHDS
- Page 106 and 107: education 81Figure 6.3 Educational
- Page 108 and 109: education 836-14 year old, about 40
- Page 110 and 111: education 85in a lose-lose situatio
- Page 112 and 113: education 87society. Arithmetic ski
- Page 114 and 115: education 89Table A.6.2aDiscontinua
- Page 116 and 117: education 91Table A.6.3a Schooling
- Page 118 and 119: education 93Table A.6.4a Reading, W
- Page 120 and 121: education 95Table A.6.5a Skill Leve
- Page 122 and 123: 7Health and Medical CareThroughout
- Page 124 and 125: health and medical care 99Box 7.1Al
- Page 126 and 127: health and medical care 101Figure 7
- Page 128 and 129: health and medical care 103Source:
- Page 130 and 131: health and medical care 105Figure 7
- Page 132 and 133: health and medical care 107Medical
- Page 134 and 135: health and medical care 109Sixty ni
- Page 136 and 137: health and medical care 111increase
- Page 138 and 139: health and medical care 113Figure 7
- Page 140 and 141: health and medical care 115Box 7.3T
- Page 142 and 143: health and medical care 117Table A.
- Page 144 and 145: health and medical care 119Table A.
- Page 146: health and medical care 121Table A.
- Page 150 and 151: 8Child Well-beingThe well-being of
- Page 152 and 153: child well-being 127privileged and
- Page 154 and 155:
child well-being 129Source: IHDS 20
- Page 156 and 157:
child well-being 131age. Our result
- Page 158 and 159:
child well-being 133Table A.8.1a In
- Page 160 and 161:
child well-being 135Table A.8.2bSta
- Page 162 and 163:
child well-being 137Table A.8.3bSta
- Page 164 and 165:
well-being of the older population
- Page 166 and 167:
well-being of the older population
- Page 168 and 169:
well-being of the older population
- Page 170 and 171:
well-being of the older population
- Page 172 and 173:
well-being of the older population
- Page 174 and 175:
gender and family dynamics 149Not s
- Page 176 and 177:
gender and family dynamics 151withi
- Page 178 and 179:
gender and family dynamics 153monet
- Page 180 and 181:
gender and family dynamics 155DISCU
- Page 182 and 183:
gender and family dynamics 157Table
- Page 184 and 185:
gender and family dynamics 159Table
- Page 186 and 187:
gender and family dynamics 161Table
- Page 188 and 189:
gender and family dynamics 163Table
- Page 190 and 191:
gender and family dynamics 165Table
- Page 192:
gender and family dynamics 167Table
- Page 196 and 197:
11Social Integration and ExclusionT
- Page 198 and 199:
social integration and exclusion 17
- Page 200 and 201:
social integration and exclusion 17
- Page 202 and 203:
social integration and exclusion 17
- Page 204 and 205:
social integration and exclusion 17
- Page 206 and 207:
social integration and exclusion 18
- Page 208 and 209:
villages in a global world 183mean
- Page 210 and 211:
villages in a global world 185Table
- Page 212 and 213:
villages in a global world 187Table
- Page 214 and 215:
villages in a global world 189Table
- Page 216 and 217:
villages in a global world 191Table
- Page 218:
villages in a global world 193Figur
- Page 222 and 223:
13Social Safety Nets in IndiaPublic
- Page 224 and 225:
social safety nets in india 199Anty
- Page 226 and 227:
social safety nets in india 201THE
- Page 228 and 229:
social safety nets in india 203HIGH
- Page 230 and 231:
social safety nets in india 205(Tab
- Page 232 and 233:
14ConclusionI was again on a great
- Page 234 and 235:
conclusion 209enrolment, it also un
- Page 236 and 237:
conclusion 211availability of work
- Page 238 and 239:
Appendix I—IHDS: The DesignOne of
- Page 240 and 241:
appendix i 215Figure AI.2 India Hum
- Page 242 and 243:
appendix i 217Table AI.1Statewise D
- Page 244 and 245:
appendix i 219(Table AI.2 contd )Ne
- Page 246 and 247:
appendix i 221developed for NSS emp
- Page 248 and 249:
Appendix II—Chapter Organization
- Page 250 and 251:
appendix ii 225(Table AII.1 contd )
- Page 252 and 253:
appendix ii 227will often require t
- Page 254 and 255:
BibliographyAbbas, A.A. and G.J. Wa
- Page 256 and 257:
ibliography 231Blyn, G. (1966). Agr
- Page 258 and 259:
ibliography 233Malik, S. (1979). So