13.07.2015 Views

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 human development <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>diaPoor states, such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chattisgarh,and Orissa have the lowest overall days employed by men(about 190–5 days; see Table A.4.2b); wealthier Punjab,Haryana, Delhi, and Maharashtra have the highest numberof days employed (about 260–300 days). The state differencesfor women are also strik<strong>in</strong>g, rang<strong>in</strong>g from eighty to eighty sixdays <strong>in</strong> Bihar and Jharkhand, to 196 <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra, and204 <strong>in</strong> Delhi. These large differences <strong>in</strong> days worked are atleast partly responsible for the many differences <strong>in</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>gacross the states. Some of these state differences are associatedwith greater urbanization, but most are based on theavailability of work <strong>in</strong> rural areas. On the whole, differences<strong>in</strong> rural employment, across state boundaries, are larger thanthose <strong>in</strong> urban employment. 3 On an average, employed men<strong>in</strong> rural Maharashtra work about 235 days per year, comparedwith only 172 days <strong>in</strong> Uttar Pradesh. Similarly, largedifferences <strong>in</strong> days worked are found for rural women.The <strong>in</strong>ability to ga<strong>in</strong> year-round work is one of themost important markers of economic vulnerability. Jobsthat provide year-round work <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>comes by reduc<strong>in</strong>gunderemployment. Year-round work is usually associatedwith salaried employment at monthly wages, non-farm work<strong>in</strong> rural areas <strong>in</strong> sectors such as construction, and <strong>in</strong>creasedavailability of agricultural work due to multiple cropp<strong>in</strong>gseasons <strong>in</strong> a year.TYPES OF EMPLOYMENTThe preced<strong>in</strong>g sections suggest a need to look beyond thesimple availability of work to explore the sectors of employment,s<strong>in</strong>ce this determ<strong>in</strong>es the level of underemployment aswell as <strong>in</strong>come. In this section, work activities are classified<strong>in</strong>to six categories grouped <strong>in</strong>to farm and non-farm work(see Figure 4.2). Each <strong>in</strong>dividual can be employed <strong>in</strong> morethan one of these six types of work. Indeed, this sectionfocuses on who has multiple types of employment.This figure highlights the differences between men andwomen, and between urban and rural areas. When employed,rural women are likely to work <strong>in</strong> farm related activities.Rural men also have access to some non-farm work, suchas non-farm casual labour (24 per cent), salaried work (13per cent), and bus<strong>in</strong>ess (12 per cent). More urban men engage<strong>in</strong> salaried work and bus<strong>in</strong>ess than do rural men, althoughnon-agricultural wage work as daily labourers rema<strong>in</strong>s importantfor both. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, even among employed womenFigure 4.2Source: IHDS 2004–5 data.Type of Employment for Work<strong>in</strong>g Men and Women3The coefficient of variation, which reflects the amount of variation <strong>in</strong> days worked across states, is twelve for rural and seven for urban maleemployment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!