13.07.2015 Views

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

appendix i 219(Table AI.2 contd )New SampleRe-<strong>in</strong>terview Sample5–9 Std 34 3310–11 Std 11 1212 Some college 8 8College graduate 7 8Household IncomeNegative—Rs 999 3 31st Qu<strong>in</strong>tile (Rs 1,000–14,000) 27 232nd Qunitile (Rs 14,001–22,950) 24 233rd Qu<strong>in</strong>tile (Rs 22,951–36,097) 19 214th Qunitile (Rs 36,098–69,000) 17 185th Qunitle (Rs 69,001+) 10 12Source: IHDS 2004–5 data.However, a comparison of IHDS data with the NSS(2004–5), NFHS-III (2005–6) and Census (2001) presented<strong>in</strong> Table AI.3 provides considerable reassurance about therobustness of IHDS data. IHDS sample distribution onurban residence, caste, and religion is remarkably similar toNSS and NFHS-III, although all three surveys (IHDS, NSS,and NFHS) have a higher proportion of households claim<strong>in</strong>gScheduled Caste status than enumerated <strong>in</strong> Census. TheIHDS has a slightly higher proportion of households fall<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> Scheduled Caste category and slightly lower proportion<strong>in</strong> Scheduled Tribe category than NSS or NFHS. On othervariables of <strong>in</strong>terest, we f<strong>in</strong>d literacy and school enrolment<strong>in</strong> IHDS to be very similar to that <strong>in</strong> NSS. On workparticipation rate for males, IHDS falls <strong>in</strong> between NSS andCensus estimates. However, given the special effort made toFigure AI.4 Sample DistributionNote: 276 households were selected as rural but became urban by2001, br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g the total of urban households to 14,820.Source: IHDS 2004–5 data.obta<strong>in</strong> estimates of women’s unpaid work, it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>gthat IHDS estimates for women’s work participation arehigher than both NSS and the Census. Family size estimatesrange from 4.7 <strong>in</strong> NSS to 5.3 <strong>in</strong> the Census. The averagefamily size <strong>in</strong> IHDS was 5.2. Of particular <strong>in</strong>terest is thepoverty rate estimated at 25.7 per cent by IHDS, close to27.5 per cent estimated by NSS. The IHDS records a higherproportion of households own<strong>in</strong>g TV, us<strong>in</strong>g electricity andLPG gas than the NSS, possibly due to differences <strong>in</strong> questionword<strong>in</strong>g. But on most other variables, the IHDS results seemto be fairly consistent with the results from other surveys.However, it is important to note that these broadsimilarities between IHDS data and other data sources donot rema<strong>in</strong> quite so robust when we look at sub-nationallevels. Hence, we caution the readers about over <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>gIHDS estimates for statewise or other smaller samples. TheIHDS sample sizes are large enough to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the generalpatterns that determ<strong>in</strong>e human development outcomes,but if readers desire a precise po<strong>in</strong>t estimate of the level ofsome particular <strong>in</strong>dicator for a sub-sample of the <strong>India</strong>npopulation, they are better referred to sources such as theNSS or the Census.QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGNThe 100 pages of questions used <strong>in</strong> IHDS were carefullyselected from items successfully adm<strong>in</strong>istered <strong>in</strong> previoussurveys <strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> and other develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, althoughsome were modified after field<strong>in</strong>g these <strong>in</strong> the pre-test<strong>in</strong>gof IHDS questionnaire. Some topics on which IHDS hasspecial perspective (for example, marriage and genderrelations) required the development of a new set of questions.But all questions, even those adopted from previous work,went through rigorous pre-test<strong>in</strong>g and screen<strong>in</strong>g. The f<strong>in</strong>al

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!