13.07.2015 Views

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

health and medical care 111<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> medical care, mothers are less likely to receivephysician assistance as they have more children.In addition to these strong class and birth order effects,geography is aga<strong>in</strong> associated with much of a mother’s medicalcare dur<strong>in</strong>g delivery (Table A.7.2b). Almost all births(98 per cent) <strong>in</strong> Kerala are physician attended. The rest ofthe South also has high rates of physician assistance. AndhraPradesh (82 per cent) and Tamil Nadu (79 per cent) arenotably high. Even Karnataka, at 57 per cent and the lowest<strong>in</strong> the south, is still well above the national average. At theopposite extreme, only 15 per cent of births <strong>in</strong> Uttar Pradeshand only 16 per cent <strong>in</strong> Madhya Pradesh are assisted by physicians.Mothers <strong>in</strong> the H<strong>in</strong>di belt appear to <strong>in</strong>habit a differentmedical world than mothers <strong>in</strong> the south. Even with<strong>in</strong>the states, where people live makes a major difference <strong>in</strong>medical care. The majority (75 per cent) of metropolitan areabirths are assisted by physicians. Rural mothers <strong>in</strong> less developedvillages enjoy only one-third that rate (25 per cent).F<strong>in</strong>ally, government services play a somewhat greater role<strong>in</strong> maternal medical care than they do for m<strong>in</strong>or or majorillnesses. For both long- and short-term illnesses, among<strong>in</strong>dividuals who receive any care, only one <strong>in</strong> four gets itfrom public providers, with the other three are us<strong>in</strong>g privatecare. In contrast, for deliveries, about half occur at home,and the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g are evenly split, at about 22 per cent each,between public and private maternity homes. Governmentservices also play an important role <strong>in</strong> antenatal care, with39 per cent women receiv<strong>in</strong>g care <strong>in</strong> government healthcentres and another 11 per cent be<strong>in</strong>g visited by a publichealth worker. Most importantly, public hospitals providedelivery to the most vulnerable sections of the population,the poor, the less educated, Dalits, Adivasis, and Muslims(Table A.7.2a).EXPENDITURES ON MEDICAL CARE<strong>India</strong>n households spend a surpris<strong>in</strong>gly large proportionof their <strong>in</strong>comes on medical care. Medical expenses are animportant reason why households fall <strong>in</strong>to the debt trap,with nearly 16 per cent of households report<strong>in</strong>g that theirlargest loan <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g five years was taken for medicalexpenses. The typical m<strong>in</strong>or illnesses (cough, fever, anddiarrhoea) cost Rs 120, although 10 per cent of these illnessescost more than Rs 500. Because of this skewed distribution,the mean expense was Rs 294, more than twice the expensefor the typical household with an illness. There was littledifference <strong>in</strong> expenditures among the three m<strong>in</strong>or illnesses(see Table 7.1 and Figure 7.13).Major illnesses were considerably more costly. A majorillness cost the average sick person Rs 1,900 dur<strong>in</strong>g theyear, although 10 per cent spent Rs 11,000 or more. Meanexpenditures for persons with a major illness were Rs 5,053.Cancer treatments were especially expensive (Rs 3,800),while cataracts were treated for Rs 1,000.When we comb<strong>in</strong>e expenditures on all householdmembers, on an average, each <strong>India</strong>n household spentRs 190 on m<strong>in</strong>or illnesses dur<strong>in</strong>g the year (even thoughthree-quarters spent noth<strong>in</strong>g) and even more, Rs 1,680, onmajor illnesses dur<strong>in</strong>g the year. The relationship betweenhousehold <strong>in</strong>come and illness expenditures presented <strong>in</strong>Figure 7.14 is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g.For m<strong>in</strong>or illnesses, the expenditures do not vary byhousehold <strong>in</strong>come. For major illnesses, the expendituresvary substantially by household <strong>in</strong>come, with a range ofRs 1,274 <strong>in</strong> the lowest <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile to Rs 2,571 <strong>in</strong> thehighest <strong>in</strong>come qu<strong>in</strong>tile, and a sharp <strong>in</strong>crease between thefourth and fifth qu<strong>in</strong>tile. This is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g. For m<strong>in</strong>orillnesses, the costs are mostly medic<strong>in</strong>e related and areFigure 7.13Source: IHDS 2004–5 data.Medical Spend<strong>in</strong>g for Short-term and Long-term Illness

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!