13.07.2015 Views

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

Human Development in India - NCAER

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

employment 47These agricultural and non-agricultural wage rates mustbe viewed <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the rampant underemploymentdiscussed earlier. With only 206 days of average workavailable to rural men compared to 282 days for urban men,a rural agricultural wage labourer can expect to earn aboutRs 10,242 per year, while the urban non-agricultural labourercan expect to earn about Rs 22,395. All of these wages are afar cry from the average annual earn<strong>in</strong>gs of over Rs 50,000per year for an illiterate male work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a salaried governmentjob. Thus, it is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g that salaried jobs <strong>in</strong> thegovernment sector are so coveted.An earlier section <strong>in</strong> this chapter identified that asubstantial proportion of <strong>in</strong>dividuals, about 20 per cent ofmale workers <strong>in</strong> rural areas, engage <strong>in</strong> both farm and offfarmactivities. These workers are more disadvantaged thantheir brothers who engage <strong>in</strong> only one type of work. Foragricultural wages, rural men who work only <strong>in</strong> the farmoriented sector receive Rs 50 per day, compared with Rs 43for those who comb<strong>in</strong>e farm and non-farm activities. On theother hand, for non-agricultural work, men who undertakeonly non-agricultural work receive Rs 83 per day, comparedto Rs 63 per day for those who engage <strong>in</strong> both farm and nonfarmwork. This suggests that the phenomenon of comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gwork <strong>in</strong> different sectors may be due more to a lack of otheroptions than to a preference by <strong>in</strong>dividuals.EARNINGSDifferences <strong>in</strong> total earn<strong>in</strong>gs 7 result from a comb<strong>in</strong>ation ofbetter jobs (especially salaried work), more work days, and ahigher wage rate. These advantages accumulate across educationallevel, age, social group, gender, and especially, urbanlocation. Thus, employed rural women earn an average ofRs 42 per day, that is, Rs 4,491 earn<strong>in</strong>gs per year. Rural menwork more days and at a higher average rate (Rs 79) and,thus, earn 3.6 times as much (Rs 16,216) as rural women <strong>in</strong>a year. Employed urban women work about as many daysas rural men but at a much higher average rate (Rs 118),and so they earn more <strong>in</strong> a year (Rs 21,263) than rural menor women. F<strong>in</strong>ally, urban men work the most days and at ahigher rate (Rs 173), and so they have the highest annualearn<strong>in</strong>gs (Rs 48,848).These daily wage rates are strongly affected by <strong>in</strong>vestments<strong>in</strong> human capital, especially education. Figure 4.7shows returns to years of school<strong>in</strong>g, separately for men andwomen <strong>in</strong> urban and rural areas.Urban wage rates are higher than rural wage rates atevery educational level and men’s wage rates are higher thanwomen’s for every educational level except urban secondaryschool completion, for which there is little difference. Onlya small proportion of urban women work. It may be thatamong the high education category, only women who canobta<strong>in</strong> high salaries work, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the difference betweenmales and females for this select category. The educationaldifferences, at least for secondary school and beyond, arelarger than even the gender or rural–urban differences.However, there appear to be negligible economic returns toprimary school. Primary school graduates earn little morethan illiterates.Other group differences are smaller than the underly<strong>in</strong>geducational, rural–urban location, and gender differences,and are, <strong>in</strong> part, attributable to these underly<strong>in</strong>g differences(see Table A.4.5a). For example, Dalits and rural Adivasishave low wages and annual earn<strong>in</strong>gs, while forward castesand other m<strong>in</strong>ority religions have higher wages and earn<strong>in</strong>gs.These earn<strong>in</strong>gs differences mirror the educational differencesamong these social groups reported <strong>in</strong> Chapter 6. Statevariations are aga<strong>in</strong> substantial.DISCUSSIONThis chapter has exam<strong>in</strong>ed the broad shape of employment<strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong>. Chapter 2 identified the <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> economicwell-be<strong>in</strong>g along the l<strong>in</strong>es of caste, educational status, andregion. This chapter has focused on employment as the keymechanism through which these <strong>in</strong>equalities emerge. Lackof access to an adequate quantity of work, coupled with<strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> remuneration, based on occupation and<strong>in</strong>dustry, as well as <strong>in</strong>dividual characteristics generate the<strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come recorded earlier. Several dimensions ofthis phenomenon deserve attention. Access to employmentrema<strong>in</strong>s limited for many sectors of society. Female labourforce participation rates are low and when employed, womenFigure 4.7Source: IHDS 2004–5 data.Daily Income (Wage/Salary) by Education forMen and Women (Urban and Rural)7Daily earn<strong>in</strong>gs here <strong>in</strong>clude monthly salaries divided by 22, and daily wages for labourers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!