04.12.2012 Views

Rila Monastery Nature Park Management Plan - part - usaid

Rila Monastery Nature Park Management Plan - part - usaid

Rila Monastery Nature Park Management Plan - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

February 2004<br />

On the whole, both valleys are oriented in an east-west direction. The two rivers,<br />

which run steady and full all year round, have their point of confluence at Brichebor<br />

locality. Their valleys are separated by a steep and tall mountain ridge, which falls<br />

entirely within the <strong>Park</strong> perimeter. The ridge is characterized by the steep incline of<br />

both its northern and southern slopes, its high-mountain meadows and pastures in its<br />

upper reaches, and the several high, pointed peaks (Ostratz, Theodossievi Karaouli,<br />

Baba and Prichebor) that crown it. From the east, the ridge is accessible to the area of<br />

Ribni Lakes (a cluster of glacial high-mountain lakes) and the Hydroto locality.<br />

All river valleys in the park are characterized by slopes that are steep or very steep in<br />

incline. Table 31 shows the distribution of terrains in the <strong>Park</strong> territory according to<br />

incline.<br />

Table 31: Distribution of terrains within the territory of RMNP according to<br />

incline<br />

Incline % % of RMNP area<br />

0-10 2.5<br />

11-20 5.3<br />

21-30 9.7<br />

31-40 1.0<br />

Over 40 70.5<br />

Aesthetic quality of the landscapes<br />

As a result of the field assessment of landscapes carried out in 2001, the landscapes in<br />

RMNP were rated for quality according to a number of criteria (aesthetic and others),<br />

the decisive criterion being the all-round appearance of the landscape (Appendix 26).<br />

In the lab assessment, in 43% of all cases considered, of decisive importance for the<br />

final score was the sum of all aesthetic criteria plus the general character grade.<br />

Therefore, the landscape of <strong>Rila</strong> <strong>Monastery</strong> <strong>Nature</strong> <strong>Park</strong> is perceived and assessed in<br />

an aesthetically complex manner, as an integral unity of components and qualities. Of<br />

the landscapes subject to the field assessment, about 85% were rated as highly<br />

picturesque and vividly evocative, and only 15% as being of medium aesthetic<br />

appeal. The final scores are closely related to the great relative significance of the<br />

criterion of naturalness (preservedness), stability, uniqueness (rarity, exotic flavor):<br />

over 90% of the landscapes assessed scored high for stability; 84%, for naturalness,<br />

and ca. 82% scored high for uniqueness.<br />

The landscapes in RMNP as a natural resource<br />

The ranking of components which determine the character and aesthetic merit of a<br />

landscape in the lab assessment shows that the presence of forest has the highest<br />

relative importance (28%), followed by rocks and rock formations (17%), lay of the<br />

land (12%), aquatic components (11%), etc. There is a correlation between the<br />

presence of a given component within a given landscape and the significance of that<br />

component for the landscape’s character and outlook. In this line of thought, it is<br />

worth noting that the relatively low recorded significance of flowers (4%) does not<br />

mean that they have been played down in the assessment; it simply means that<br />

flowers appear in a negligible number of landscapes that have been subject to lab<br />

<strong>Rila</strong> monastery <strong>Nature</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

Manaegment<strong>Plan</strong> - Draft<br />

2004 - 2013<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!