13.07.2015 Views

R,CHARD MONCKTON MILNES was born in the year - OUDL Home

R,CHARD MONCKTON MILNES was born in the year - OUDL Home

R,CHARD MONCKTON MILNES was born in the year - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

202 Frederick S. Boasaltoge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>to fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e hands. It may be long before <strong>the</strong> advocatesof woman's rights will conquer o<strong>the</strong>r prov<strong>in</strong>ces of labour; but<strong>the</strong>y have already monopolised to a great extent <strong>the</strong> immensenovel manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry of Great Brita<strong>in</strong>.Had Stephen lived till our day he would have seen that<strong>the</strong> advocates of woman's rights (how out of date <strong>the</strong>phrase sounds!) had secured <strong>the</strong>ir position <strong>in</strong> nearlyevery prov<strong>in</strong>ce of labour, not to speak of <strong>the</strong>ir triumph<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> political sphere. But <strong>in</strong> spite of this, perhaps partlyon account of it, <strong>the</strong>re seems less prospect than ever of<strong>the</strong>ir monopolis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> realm of fiction. We have verydist<strong>in</strong>guished women novelists <strong>in</strong> this generation—someof <strong>the</strong>m are among <strong>the</strong> most em<strong>in</strong>ent Fellows of thisSociety—but (to say <strong>the</strong> least) <strong>the</strong>y have not playedMr Wells, Mr Galsworthy and Mr Arnold Bennett off <strong>the</strong>stage. And <strong>the</strong>se are only a few of <strong>the</strong> mascul<strong>in</strong>e namesthat will occur to everyone. Here at least is one anticipationby a s<strong>in</strong>gularly cool-headed critic <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'seventies ofwhich Time has made a laugh<strong>in</strong>g stock. 1But it may seem surpris<strong>in</strong>g that I have got so farwithout mention<strong>in</strong>g, except as a poet, <strong>the</strong> most famousand <strong>in</strong>fluential of mid-Victorian critics, Mat<strong>the</strong>w Arnold.The reason is that <strong>the</strong> decade of <strong>the</strong> 'seventies is, <strong>in</strong> aremarkable way, a watershed between <strong>the</strong> two streams,<strong>the</strong> earlier and <strong>the</strong> later, of Arnold's literary criticism.Dur<strong>in</strong>g his ten <strong>year</strong>s' occupancy, 1857-67, of <strong>the</strong> OxfordChair of Poetry, he had published his Lectures on Translat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Home</strong>r (1861-2), <strong>the</strong> first series of Essays <strong>in</strong>Criticism (1865), and <strong>the</strong> Lectures on <strong>the</strong> Study of CelticLiterature (1867). Needless to say that each of <strong>the</strong>se is <strong>in</strong>its own way a classic, even <strong>the</strong> last, though Arnold knewno Celtic tongue. Essays <strong>in</strong> Criticism is one of <strong>the</strong> booksto which <strong>the</strong> hackneyed epi<strong>the</strong>t of ' epoch-mak<strong>in</strong>g' maybe truly applied <strong>in</strong> its own sphere. The second series of1 Stephen himself seems to have afterwards modified his view for <strong>the</strong>passage is omitted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1892 revised edition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!