13.07.2015 Views

R,CHARD MONCKTON MILNES was born in the year - OUDL Home

R,CHARD MONCKTON MILNES was born in the year - OUDL Home

R,CHARD MONCKTON MILNES was born in the year - OUDL Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cambridge <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'Seventies 255bouts of th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g comparatively easy. This <strong>was</strong> <strong>the</strong> timeof <strong>the</strong> Balfour bro<strong>the</strong>rs, F. W. Maitland, and o<strong>the</strong>rs of<strong>the</strong> first order. W. K. Clifford only left for a LondonProfessorship <strong>in</strong> 1871, and <strong>was</strong> still <strong>in</strong> touch with Cambridge.Most of <strong>the</strong>se died young, and strictly belong to<strong>the</strong> 'seventies. Beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>se bright young figures stoodthat of Henry Sidgwick, a maturer seeker after truth,writ<strong>in</strong>g books on Ethics and already giv<strong>in</strong>g thought toMetaphysics, Political Economy, Political Science, andmany o<strong>the</strong>r subjects. The relations between him and <strong>the</strong>younger men were for various reasons 1 unusually close;and it <strong>was</strong> largely through <strong>the</strong> impression made by this<strong>in</strong>tellectual company that Cambridge began to lose someof its old self-satisfaction.Meanwhile thoughts and pens were not all engaged <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> warfare of serious controversy. If <strong>in</strong> light literature<strong>the</strong> output of <strong>the</strong> period hardly rivals that of its predecessor,when Calverley and G. 0. Trevelyan flourished,<strong>the</strong>re <strong>was</strong> no lack of shortlived 2 publications <strong>in</strong> whichyouthful enterprise found vent. Among <strong>the</strong>se I recall <strong>the</strong>armchair papers of <strong>the</strong> Cambridge Tatler <strong>in</strong> 1871-2, <strong>in</strong>which V. H. Stanton and A. J. Mason were concerned,but I th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> most notable contributor <strong>was</strong> ChristopherWordsworth. All <strong>the</strong>se three were of Tr<strong>in</strong>ity. Of certa<strong>in</strong>very ephemeral journalistic efforts I can remember oneor two names such as <strong>the</strong> Moslem, and Momus <strong>in</strong> whichE. H. Palmer wrote. But by far <strong>the</strong> wittiest product ofthose days <strong>was</strong> <strong>the</strong> Light Green, where true genius enlarged<strong>the</strong> scope of Parody with a skill that lifted it high<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region of literary art. In it occurred, dur<strong>in</strong>g aLittlego-exam<strong>in</strong>ation scene, two l<strong>in</strong>es still often quoted:And, though <strong>the</strong>y wrote it all by rote,They did not write it right.1 See H. Sidgwick, a Memoir, passim and especially p. 820.2 I would note that <strong>the</strong> Johnian Eagle, started <strong>in</strong> 1859 by S. Butlerand o<strong>the</strong>rs, is still <strong>in</strong> flight.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!