13.07.2015 Views

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.4 PARTIAL FRACTIONSA i but linear functions of x, i.e.ofthe<strong>for</strong>mB i x + C i . Thus, in the expansion,linear terms (first-degree polynomials) in the denominator have constants (zerodegreepolynomials) in their numerators, whilst quadratic terms (second-degreepolynomials) in the denominator have linear terms (first-degree polynomials) intheir numerators. As a symbolic <strong>for</strong>mula, the partial fraction expansion ofg(x)(x − α 1 )(x − α 2 ) ···(x − α p )(x 2 + a 2 1 )(x2 + a 2 2 ) ···(x2 + a 2 q )should take the <strong>for</strong>mA 1x − α 1+ A 2x − α 2+ ···+A p+ B 1x + C 1x − α p x 2 + a 2 + B 2x + C 21x 2 + a 2 2+ ···+ B qx + C qx 2 + a 2 .qOf course, the degree of g(x) must be less than p +2q; if it is not, an initialdivision must be carried out as demonstrated earlier.Repeated factors in the denominatorConsider trying (incorrectly) to exp<strong>and</strong>f(x) =x − 4(x +1)(x − 2) 2in partial fraction <strong>for</strong>m as follows:x − 4(x +1)(x − 2) 2 = A 1x +1 + A 2(x − 2) 2 .Multiplying both sides of this supposed equality by (x +1)(x − 2) 2 produces anequation whose LHS is linear in x, whilst its RHS is quadratic. This is clearlywrong <strong>and</strong> so an expansion in the above <strong>for</strong>m cannot be valid. The correction wemust make is very similar to that needed in the previous subsection, namely thatsince (x − 2) 2 is a quadratic polynomial the numerator of the term containing itmust be a first-degree polynomial, <strong>and</strong> not simply a constant.The correct <strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> the part of the expansion containing the doubly repeatedroot is there<strong>for</strong>e (Bx+ C)/(x − 2) 2 . Using this <strong>for</strong>m <strong>and</strong> either of methods (i) <strong>and</strong>(ii) <strong>for</strong> determining the constants gives the full partial fraction expansion asx − 4(x +1)(x − 2) 2 = − 5 5x − 16+9(x +1) 9(x − 2) 2 ,as the reader may verify.Since any term of the <strong>for</strong>m (Bx + C)/(x − α) 2 can be written asB(x − α)+C + Bα(x − α) 2 = Bx − α + C + Bα(x − α) 2 ,<strong>and</strong> similarly <strong>for</strong> multiply repeated roots, an alternative <strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> the part of thepartial fraction expansion containing a repeated root α isD 1x − α + D 2(x − α) 2 + ···+ D p(x − α) p . (1.48)23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!