13.07.2015 Views

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HIGHER-ORDER ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS15.2.4 Variation of parametersThe method of variation of parameters proves useful in finding particular integrals<strong>for</strong> linear ODEs with variable (<strong>and</strong> constant) coefficients. However, it requiresknowledge of the entire complementary function, not just of one part of it as inthe previous subsection.Suppose we wish to find a particular integral of the equationa n (x) dn ydx n + ···+ a 1(x) dydx + a 0(x)y = f(x), (15.53)<strong>and</strong> the complementary function y c (x) (the general solution of (15.53) withf(x) = 0) isy c (x) =c 1 y 1 (x)+c 2 y 2 (x)+···+ c n y n (x),where the functions y m (x) are known. We now assume that a particular integral of(15.53) can be expressed in a <strong>for</strong>m similar to that of the complementary function,but with the constants c m replaced by functions of x, i.e.weassumeaparticularintegral of the <strong>for</strong>my p (x) =k 1 (x)y 1 (x)+k 2 (x)y 2 (x)+···+ k n (x)y n (x). (15.54)This will no longer satisfy the complementary equation (i.e. (15.53) with the RHSset to zero) but might, with suitable choices of the functions k i (x), be made equalto f(x), thus producing not a complementary function but a particular integral.Since we have n arbitrary functions k 1 (x),k 2 (x),...,k n (x), but only one restrictionon them (namely the ODE), we may impose a further n − 1 constraints. Wecan choose these constraints to be as convenient as possible, <strong>and</strong> the simplestchoice is given byk 1(x)y ′ 1 (x)+k 2(x)y ′ 2 (x)+···+ k n(x)y ′ n (x) =0k 1(x)y ′ 1(x)+k ′ 2(x)y ′ 2(x)+···+ ′ k n(x)y ′ n(x) ′ =0.. (15.55)k 1(x)y ′ (n−2)1(x)+k 2(x)y ′ (n−2)2(x)+···+ k n(x)y ′ n (n−2) (x) =0k 1(x)y ′ (n−1)1(x)+k 2(x)y ′ (n−1)2(x)+···+ k n(x)y ′ n(n−1) (x) = f(x)a n (x) ,where the primes denote differentiation with respect to x. The last of theseequations is not a freely chosen constraint; given the previous n − 1 constraints<strong>and</strong> the original ODE, it must be satisfied.This choice of constraints is easily justified (although the algebra is quitemessy). Differentiating (15.54) with respect to x, we obtainy ′ p = k 1 y ′ 1 + k 2 y ′ 2 + ···+ k n y ′ n +[k ′ 1y 1 + k ′ 2y 2 + ···+ k ′ ny n ],where, <strong>for</strong> the moment, we drop the explicit x-dependence of these functions. Since508

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!