13.07.2015 Views

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering - Matematica.NET

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUP THEORY1 i −1 −i1 1 i −1 −ii i −1 −i 1−1 −1 −i 1 i−i −i 1 i −11 2 4 31 1 2 4 32 2 4 3 14 4 3 1 23 3 1 2 4Table 28.5 A comparison between tables 28.4 <strong>and</strong> 28.2(b), the latter with itscolumns reordered.I A B CI I A B CA A B C IB B C I AC C I A BTable 28.6 The common structure exemplified by tables 28.4 <strong>and</strong> 28.2(b), thelatter with its columns reordered.amount of relabelling (or, equivalently, no allocation of the symbols A, B, C, amongsti, −1, −i) can bring table 28.4 into the <strong>for</strong>m of table 28.3. We conclude that the group{1,i,−1, −i} is not isomorphic to S or S ′ . An alternative way of stating the observation isto say that the group contains only one element of order 2 whilst a group correspondingto table 28.3 contains three such elements.However, if the rows <strong>and</strong> columns of table 28.2(b) – in which the identity does appeartwice on the diagonal <strong>and</strong> which there<strong>for</strong>e has the potential to be equivalent to table 28.4 –are rearranged by making the heading order 1, 2, 4, 3 then the two tables can be comparedin the <strong>for</strong>ms shown in table 28.5. They can thus be seen to have the same structure, namelythat shown in table 28.6.We there<strong>for</strong>e conclude that the group of four elements {1,i,−1, −i} under ordinary multiplicationof complex numbers is isomorphic to the group {1, 2, 3, 4} under multiplication(mod 5). ◭What we have done does not prove it, but the two tables 28.3 <strong>and</strong> 28.6 are infact the only possible tables <strong>for</strong> a group of order 4, i.e. a group containing exactlyfour elements.28.3 Non-Abelian groupsSo far, all the groups <strong>for</strong> which we have constructed multiplication tables havebeen based on some <strong>for</strong>m of arithmetic multiplication, a commutative operation,with the result that the groups have been Abelian <strong>and</strong> the tables symmetricabout the leading diagonal. We now turn to examples of groups in which somenon-commutation occurs. It should be noted, in passing, that non-commutationcannot occur throughout a group, as the identity always commutes with anyelement in its group.1052

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!